- This topic has 250 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 7 months ago by
waiting for bottom.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 25, 2008 at 6:59 PM #176697March 26, 2008 at 4:26 AM #176308
tothjj
ParticipantWell, the thing about that house is it had a great location as I remember. So take a house that was big, showed very nicely and was a primo location and you have a house at the top of the food chain. I would suspect that most other places do not have the allure of this house so it’s all downhill from that sales price.
March 26, 2008 at 4:26 AM #176662tothjj
ParticipantWell, the thing about that house is it had a great location as I remember. So take a house that was big, showed very nicely and was a primo location and you have a house at the top of the food chain. I would suspect that most other places do not have the allure of this house so it’s all downhill from that sales price.
March 26, 2008 at 4:26 AM #176665tothjj
ParticipantWell, the thing about that house is it had a great location as I remember. So take a house that was big, showed very nicely and was a primo location and you have a house at the top of the food chain. I would suspect that most other places do not have the allure of this house so it’s all downhill from that sales price.
March 26, 2008 at 4:26 AM #176670tothjj
ParticipantWell, the thing about that house is it had a great location as I remember. So take a house that was big, showed very nicely and was a primo location and you have a house at the top of the food chain. I would suspect that most other places do not have the allure of this house so it’s all downhill from that sales price.
March 26, 2008 at 4:26 AM #176762tothjj
ParticipantWell, the thing about that house is it had a great location as I remember. So take a house that was big, showed very nicely and was a primo location and you have a house at the top of the food chain. I would suspect that most other places do not have the allure of this house so it’s all downhill from that sales price.
March 26, 2008 at 2:02 PM #176606Eugene
ParticipantNext door neighbor closed today at 680k. A 15% cut from 11-2004 sales price, but still outrageously expensive.
March 26, 2008 at 2:02 PM #176957Eugene
ParticipantNext door neighbor closed today at 680k. A 15% cut from 11-2004 sales price, but still outrageously expensive.
March 26, 2008 at 2:02 PM #176959Eugene
ParticipantNext door neighbor closed today at 680k. A 15% cut from 11-2004 sales price, but still outrageously expensive.
March 26, 2008 at 2:02 PM #176963Eugene
ParticipantNext door neighbor closed today at 680k. A 15% cut from 11-2004 sales price, but still outrageously expensive.
March 26, 2008 at 2:02 PM #177056Eugene
ParticipantNext door neighbor closed today at 680k. A 15% cut from 11-2004 sales price, but still outrageously expensive.
March 26, 2008 at 8:56 PM #176763waiting for bottom
Participantun-believable. These knife catchers just prolong the agony for all of us.
March 26, 2008 at 8:56 PM #177117waiting for bottom
Participantun-believable. These knife catchers just prolong the agony for all of us.
March 26, 2008 at 8:56 PM #177125waiting for bottom
Participantun-believable. These knife catchers just prolong the agony for all of us.
March 26, 2008 at 8:56 PM #177129waiting for bottom
Participantun-believable. These knife catchers just prolong the agony for all of us.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
