- This topic has 130 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 18 years ago by
PadreBrian.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 16, 2007 at 10:38 AM #100243November 16, 2007 at 11:05 AM #100152
patientlywaiting
ParticipantOut of curiosity, I was looking at the Lennar development in Irvine since my kid wants to go to UCI in a couple of years.
It’s a massive development. I agree with bugs.. there’s no way that Lennar can hold on to hundreds of unoccupied condos indefinitely. They’re just bluffing. It’s going to be a bloodbath.
November 16, 2007 at 11:05 AM #100231patientlywaiting
ParticipantOut of curiosity, I was looking at the Lennar development in Irvine since my kid wants to go to UCI in a couple of years.
It’s a massive development. I agree with bugs.. there’s no way that Lennar can hold on to hundreds of unoccupied condos indefinitely. They’re just bluffing. It’s going to be a bloodbath.
November 16, 2007 at 11:05 AM #100249patientlywaiting
ParticipantOut of curiosity, I was looking at the Lennar development in Irvine since my kid wants to go to UCI in a couple of years.
It’s a massive development. I agree with bugs.. there’s no way that Lennar can hold on to hundreds of unoccupied condos indefinitely. They’re just bluffing. It’s going to be a bloodbath.
November 16, 2007 at 11:05 AM #100261patientlywaiting
ParticipantOut of curiosity, I was looking at the Lennar development in Irvine since my kid wants to go to UCI in a couple of years.
It’s a massive development. I agree with bugs.. there’s no way that Lennar can hold on to hundreds of unoccupied condos indefinitely. They’re just bluffing. It’s going to be a bloodbath.
November 16, 2007 at 11:05 AM #100263patientlywaiting
ParticipantOut of curiosity, I was looking at the Lennar development in Irvine since my kid wants to go to UCI in a couple of years.
It’s a massive development. I agree with bugs.. there’s no way that Lennar can hold on to hundreds of unoccupied condos indefinitely. They’re just bluffing. It’s going to be a bloodbath.
November 16, 2007 at 11:17 AM #100172Bugs
ParticipantBuffet might have the means to bolster the builder’s stock long enough to clear a profit by squeezing the shorts. However, I think he’s smart enough to know that there is no profitable way to hold this many units and the remainder of these subdivisions for the 5 years or more that it may take for prices to recover.
I agree with patientlywaiting – Lennar can’t be so dumb as to be serious about this. They’re bluffing.
November 16, 2007 at 11:17 AM #100252Bugs
ParticipantBuffet might have the means to bolster the builder’s stock long enough to clear a profit by squeezing the shorts. However, I think he’s smart enough to know that there is no profitable way to hold this many units and the remainder of these subdivisions for the 5 years or more that it may take for prices to recover.
I agree with patientlywaiting – Lennar can’t be so dumb as to be serious about this. They’re bluffing.
November 16, 2007 at 11:17 AM #100269Bugs
ParticipantBuffet might have the means to bolster the builder’s stock long enough to clear a profit by squeezing the shorts. However, I think he’s smart enough to know that there is no profitable way to hold this many units and the remainder of these subdivisions for the 5 years or more that it may take for prices to recover.
I agree with patientlywaiting – Lennar can’t be so dumb as to be serious about this. They’re bluffing.
November 16, 2007 at 11:17 AM #100282Bugs
ParticipantBuffet might have the means to bolster the builder’s stock long enough to clear a profit by squeezing the shorts. However, I think he’s smart enough to know that there is no profitable way to hold this many units and the remainder of these subdivisions for the 5 years or more that it may take for prices to recover.
I agree with patientlywaiting – Lennar can’t be so dumb as to be serious about this. They’re bluffing.
November 16, 2007 at 11:17 AM #100284Bugs
ParticipantBuffet might have the means to bolster the builder’s stock long enough to clear a profit by squeezing the shorts. However, I think he’s smart enough to know that there is no profitable way to hold this many units and the remainder of these subdivisions for the 5 years or more that it may take for prices to recover.
I agree with patientlywaiting – Lennar can’t be so dumb as to be serious about this. They’re bluffing.
November 16, 2007 at 11:36 AM #100182Raybyrnes
Participantpatientlywaiting
I used Buffet as an Example of one company that has the financial wherewithall to go against the grain.
Lat I heard a company from Dubai bought a controlling interest in John Laing. Who is to say that with a falling dollar that another foreign country might not step in and do a buyout.
I don’t see this as feel good.
November 16, 2007 at 11:36 AM #100262Raybyrnes
Participantpatientlywaiting
I used Buffet as an Example of one company that has the financial wherewithall to go against the grain.
Lat I heard a company from Dubai bought a controlling interest in John Laing. Who is to say that with a falling dollar that another foreign country might not step in and do a buyout.
I don’t see this as feel good.
November 16, 2007 at 11:36 AM #100278Raybyrnes
Participantpatientlywaiting
I used Buffet as an Example of one company that has the financial wherewithall to go against the grain.
Lat I heard a company from Dubai bought a controlling interest in John Laing. Who is to say that with a falling dollar that another foreign country might not step in and do a buyout.
I don’t see this as feel good.
November 16, 2007 at 11:36 AM #100292Raybyrnes
Participantpatientlywaiting
I used Buffet as an Example of one company that has the financial wherewithall to go against the grain.
Lat I heard a company from Dubai bought a controlling interest in John Laing. Who is to say that with a falling dollar that another foreign country might not step in and do a buyout.
I don’t see this as feel good.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
