- This topic has 320 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by Jim Jones.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 7, 2009 at 6:05 PM #412681June 7, 2009 at 7:06 PM #411993AecetiaParticipant
Arnold’s recommended closings and selling of State real estate are bullying and scare tactics. We are being punished for not passing the tax increase. As for the illegal issue: I consider it all about demographics. Most citizens do not have families as large as the new immigrants. Social security will go bust without new tax payers being added to shore up the bloated government spending. I do not think any of the politicians really care so much for the plight of the illegals as they care for the money they will contribute either directly or indirectly to keep the government printing presses and their jobs safe. It is less about ideology than pragmatism. Color me cynical.
June 7, 2009 at 7:06 PM #412230AecetiaParticipantArnold’s recommended closings and selling of State real estate are bullying and scare tactics. We are being punished for not passing the tax increase. As for the illegal issue: I consider it all about demographics. Most citizens do not have families as large as the new immigrants. Social security will go bust without new tax payers being added to shore up the bloated government spending. I do not think any of the politicians really care so much for the plight of the illegals as they care for the money they will contribute either directly or indirectly to keep the government printing presses and their jobs safe. It is less about ideology than pragmatism. Color me cynical.
June 7, 2009 at 7:06 PM #412476AecetiaParticipantArnold’s recommended closings and selling of State real estate are bullying and scare tactics. We are being punished for not passing the tax increase. As for the illegal issue: I consider it all about demographics. Most citizens do not have families as large as the new immigrants. Social security will go bust without new tax payers being added to shore up the bloated government spending. I do not think any of the politicians really care so much for the plight of the illegals as they care for the money they will contribute either directly or indirectly to keep the government printing presses and their jobs safe. It is less about ideology than pragmatism. Color me cynical.
June 7, 2009 at 7:06 PM #412543AecetiaParticipantArnold’s recommended closings and selling of State real estate are bullying and scare tactics. We are being punished for not passing the tax increase. As for the illegal issue: I consider it all about demographics. Most citizens do not have families as large as the new immigrants. Social security will go bust without new tax payers being added to shore up the bloated government spending. I do not think any of the politicians really care so much for the plight of the illegals as they care for the money they will contribute either directly or indirectly to keep the government printing presses and their jobs safe. It is less about ideology than pragmatism. Color me cynical.
June 7, 2009 at 7:06 PM #412695AecetiaParticipantArnold’s recommended closings and selling of State real estate are bullying and scare tactics. We are being punished for not passing the tax increase. As for the illegal issue: I consider it all about demographics. Most citizens do not have families as large as the new immigrants. Social security will go bust without new tax payers being added to shore up the bloated government spending. I do not think any of the politicians really care so much for the plight of the illegals as they care for the money they will contribute either directly or indirectly to keep the government printing presses and their jobs safe. It is less about ideology than pragmatism. Color me cynical.
June 7, 2009 at 7:11 PM #411998afx114Participant[quote=meadandale]Do you know how much money illegal immigrants send back home? They aren’t spending all that money HERE, it is being spent back in Mexico…So much for all the illegal immigrants ‘helping’ our economy.[/quote]
Could that be offset by the money that is saved by the businesses who hire illegals? I’d bet that corporations save more money by hiring illegals than what the illegals themselves make and send back to their homeland. Surely these savings are cycled back into the economy by the businesses.
June 7, 2009 at 7:11 PM #412235afx114Participant[quote=meadandale]Do you know how much money illegal immigrants send back home? They aren’t spending all that money HERE, it is being spent back in Mexico…So much for all the illegal immigrants ‘helping’ our economy.[/quote]
Could that be offset by the money that is saved by the businesses who hire illegals? I’d bet that corporations save more money by hiring illegals than what the illegals themselves make and send back to their homeland. Surely these savings are cycled back into the economy by the businesses.
June 7, 2009 at 7:11 PM #412481afx114Participant[quote=meadandale]Do you know how much money illegal immigrants send back home? They aren’t spending all that money HERE, it is being spent back in Mexico…So much for all the illegal immigrants ‘helping’ our economy.[/quote]
Could that be offset by the money that is saved by the businesses who hire illegals? I’d bet that corporations save more money by hiring illegals than what the illegals themselves make and send back to their homeland. Surely these savings are cycled back into the economy by the businesses.
June 7, 2009 at 7:11 PM #412549afx114Participant[quote=meadandale]Do you know how much money illegal immigrants send back home? They aren’t spending all that money HERE, it is being spent back in Mexico…So much for all the illegal immigrants ‘helping’ our economy.[/quote]
Could that be offset by the money that is saved by the businesses who hire illegals? I’d bet that corporations save more money by hiring illegals than what the illegals themselves make and send back to their homeland. Surely these savings are cycled back into the economy by the businesses.
June 7, 2009 at 7:11 PM #412700afx114Participant[quote=meadandale]Do you know how much money illegal immigrants send back home? They aren’t spending all that money HERE, it is being spent back in Mexico…So much for all the illegal immigrants ‘helping’ our economy.[/quote]
Could that be offset by the money that is saved by the businesses who hire illegals? I’d bet that corporations save more money by hiring illegals than what the illegals themselves make and send back to their homeland. Surely these savings are cycled back into the economy by the businesses.
June 7, 2009 at 7:36 PM #412003AecetiaParticipantThe business may save money, but the taxpayers pay in the long run because of the higher taxes, higher cost of health care, etc. Stores that have a high loss due to shop lifters pass the cost onto the consumers. The insured pay for the uninsured drivers, health care, etc. There really is no free lunch and it is about time government figured that out. Many retirees will find States who will not tax them into poverty one way or the other. The boomers are not about to adjust their life style to pay for someone else. Arnold should quit running his mouth bring out the Conan sword and really use it to cut the programs he has threatened to cut. Let’s see what happens to the State then. He is turning out to be all bark and no bite.
June 7, 2009 at 7:36 PM #412240AecetiaParticipantThe business may save money, but the taxpayers pay in the long run because of the higher taxes, higher cost of health care, etc. Stores that have a high loss due to shop lifters pass the cost onto the consumers. The insured pay for the uninsured drivers, health care, etc. There really is no free lunch and it is about time government figured that out. Many retirees will find States who will not tax them into poverty one way or the other. The boomers are not about to adjust their life style to pay for someone else. Arnold should quit running his mouth bring out the Conan sword and really use it to cut the programs he has threatened to cut. Let’s see what happens to the State then. He is turning out to be all bark and no bite.
June 7, 2009 at 7:36 PM #412485AecetiaParticipantThe business may save money, but the taxpayers pay in the long run because of the higher taxes, higher cost of health care, etc. Stores that have a high loss due to shop lifters pass the cost onto the consumers. The insured pay for the uninsured drivers, health care, etc. There really is no free lunch and it is about time government figured that out. Many retirees will find States who will not tax them into poverty one way or the other. The boomers are not about to adjust their life style to pay for someone else. Arnold should quit running his mouth bring out the Conan sword and really use it to cut the programs he has threatened to cut. Let’s see what happens to the State then. He is turning out to be all bark and no bite.
June 7, 2009 at 7:36 PM #412554AecetiaParticipantThe business may save money, but the taxpayers pay in the long run because of the higher taxes, higher cost of health care, etc. Stores that have a high loss due to shop lifters pass the cost onto the consumers. The insured pay for the uninsured drivers, health care, etc. There really is no free lunch and it is about time government figured that out. Many retirees will find States who will not tax them into poverty one way or the other. The boomers are not about to adjust their life style to pay for someone else. Arnold should quit running his mouth bring out the Conan sword and really use it to cut the programs he has threatened to cut. Let’s see what happens to the State then. He is turning out to be all bark and no bite.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.