I suspect a lot of these 5+ bedroom McMansions are dinasaurs and will suffer greviously on a price per SF basis. When rising utility costs are factored in along with Americans’ coming healthy desire to downsize, quality and location will triumph over size. A smaller footprint is a good thing.
[quote=EconProf]I suspect a lot of these 5+ bedroom McMansions are dinasaurs and will suffer greviously on a price per SF basis. When rising utility costs are factored in along with Americans’ coming healthy desire to downsize, quality and location will triumph over size. A smaller footprint is a good thing.[/quote]
I wholeheartedly agree, Econprof. But you forgot to add their exorbitant MR and HOA to the mix. Thanks for posting!
[quote=EconProf]I suspect a lot of these 5+ bedroom McMansions are dinasaurs and will suffer greviously on a price per SF basis. When rising utility costs are factored in along with Americans’ coming healthy desire to downsize, quality and location will triumph over size. A smaller footprint is a good thing.[/quote]
I wholeheartedly agree, Econprof. But you forgot to add their exorbitant MR and HOA to the mix. Thanks for posting!
[quote=EconProf]I suspect a lot of these 5+ bedroom McMansions are dinasaurs and will suffer greviously on a price per SF basis. When rising utility costs are factored in along with Americans’ coming healthy desire to downsize, quality and location will triumph over size. A smaller footprint is a good thing.[/quote]
I wholeheartedly agree, Econprof. But you forgot to add their exorbitant MR and HOA to the mix. Thanks for posting!
[quote=EconProf]I suspect a lot of these 5+ bedroom McMansions are dinasaurs and will suffer greviously on a price per SF basis. When rising utility costs are factored in along with Americans’ coming healthy desire to downsize, quality and location will triumph over size. A smaller footprint is a good thing.[/quote]
I wholeheartedly agree, Econprof. But you forgot to add their exorbitant MR and HOA to the mix. Thanks for posting!
[quote=EconProf]I suspect a lot of these 5+ bedroom McMansions are dinasaurs and will suffer greviously on a price per SF basis. When rising utility costs are factored in along with Americans’ coming healthy desire to downsize, quality and location will triumph over size. A smaller footprint is a good thing.[/quote]
I wholeheartedly agree, Econprof. But you forgot to add their exorbitant MR and HOA to the mix. Thanks for posting!
Mello Roos, right, not a good deal.
HOA of $450/mo. on the smaller houses at least gets some value back. Pays for landscaping, watering, security patrols, entry gates, internet, and enforcing the rules to preserve the ambience of the development.
Mello Roos, right, not a good deal.
HOA of $450/mo. on the smaller houses at least gets some value back. Pays for landscaping, watering, security patrols, entry gates, internet, and enforcing the rules to preserve the ambience of the development.
Mello Roos, right, not a good deal.
HOA of $450/mo. on the smaller houses at least gets some value back. Pays for landscaping, watering, security patrols, entry gates, internet, and enforcing the rules to preserve the ambience of the development.
Mello Roos, right, not a good deal.
HOA of $450/mo. on the smaller houses at least gets some value back. Pays for landscaping, watering, security patrols, entry gates, internet, and enforcing the rules to preserve the ambience of the development.
Mello Roos, right, not a good deal.
HOA of $450/mo. on the smaller houses at least gets some value back. Pays for landscaping, watering, security patrols, entry gates, internet, and enforcing the rules to preserve the ambience of the development.
.
