Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Santaluz – Current Market Conditions
- This topic has 215 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by
Echoooo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 28, 2010 at 5:54 PM #557169May 28, 2010 at 8:51 PM #556345
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=EconProf]I suspect a lot of these 5+ bedroom McMansions are dinasaurs and will suffer greviously on a price per SF basis. When rising utility costs are factored in along with Americans’ coming healthy desire to downsize, quality and location will triumph over size. A smaller footprint is a good thing.[/quote]
I wholeheartedly agree, Econprof. But you forgot to add their exorbitant MR and HOA to the mix. Thanks for posting!
May 28, 2010 at 8:51 PM #556446bearishgurl
Participant[quote=EconProf]I suspect a lot of these 5+ bedroom McMansions are dinasaurs and will suffer greviously on a price per SF basis. When rising utility costs are factored in along with Americans’ coming healthy desire to downsize, quality and location will triumph over size. A smaller footprint is a good thing.[/quote]
I wholeheartedly agree, Econprof. But you forgot to add their exorbitant MR and HOA to the mix. Thanks for posting!
May 28, 2010 at 8:51 PM #556934bearishgurl
Participant[quote=EconProf]I suspect a lot of these 5+ bedroom McMansions are dinasaurs and will suffer greviously on a price per SF basis. When rising utility costs are factored in along with Americans’ coming healthy desire to downsize, quality and location will triumph over size. A smaller footprint is a good thing.[/quote]
I wholeheartedly agree, Econprof. But you forgot to add their exorbitant MR and HOA to the mix. Thanks for posting!
May 28, 2010 at 8:51 PM #557034bearishgurl
Participant[quote=EconProf]I suspect a lot of these 5+ bedroom McMansions are dinasaurs and will suffer greviously on a price per SF basis. When rising utility costs are factored in along with Americans’ coming healthy desire to downsize, quality and location will triumph over size. A smaller footprint is a good thing.[/quote]
I wholeheartedly agree, Econprof. But you forgot to add their exorbitant MR and HOA to the mix. Thanks for posting!
May 28, 2010 at 8:51 PM #557314bearishgurl
Participant[quote=EconProf]I suspect a lot of these 5+ bedroom McMansions are dinasaurs and will suffer greviously on a price per SF basis. When rising utility costs are factored in along with Americans’ coming healthy desire to downsize, quality and location will triumph over size. A smaller footprint is a good thing.[/quote]
I wholeheartedly agree, Econprof. But you forgot to add their exorbitant MR and HOA to the mix. Thanks for posting!
May 28, 2010 at 9:05 PM #556377EconProf
ParticipantMello Roos, right, not a good deal.
HOA of $450/mo. on the smaller houses at least gets some value back. Pays for landscaping, watering, security patrols, entry gates, internet, and enforcing the rules to preserve the ambience of the development.May 28, 2010 at 9:05 PM #556480EconProf
ParticipantMello Roos, right, not a good deal.
HOA of $450/mo. on the smaller houses at least gets some value back. Pays for landscaping, watering, security patrols, entry gates, internet, and enforcing the rules to preserve the ambience of the development.May 28, 2010 at 9:05 PM #556967EconProf
ParticipantMello Roos, right, not a good deal.
HOA of $450/mo. on the smaller houses at least gets some value back. Pays for landscaping, watering, security patrols, entry gates, internet, and enforcing the rules to preserve the ambience of the development.May 28, 2010 at 9:05 PM #557068EconProf
ParticipantMello Roos, right, not a good deal.
HOA of $450/mo. on the smaller houses at least gets some value back. Pays for landscaping, watering, security patrols, entry gates, internet, and enforcing the rules to preserve the ambience of the development.May 28, 2010 at 9:05 PM #557347EconProf
ParticipantMello Roos, right, not a good deal.
HOA of $450/mo. on the smaller houses at least gets some value back. Pays for landscaping, watering, security patrols, entry gates, internet, and enforcing the rules to preserve the ambience of the development.June 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM #565036toddt
ParticipantBumping to get current conditions.
June 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM #565131toddt
ParticipantBumping to get current conditions.
June 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM #565633toddt
ParticipantBumping to get current conditions.
June 14, 2010 at 11:38 PM #565740toddt
ParticipantBumping to get current conditions.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.