- This topic has 200 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 10, 2009 at 8:26 PM #414212June 10, 2009 at 8:54 PM #413529
DWCAP
ParticipantNo you cant, cause if it happened the Federal government would step in, declaring coastal housing at high costs a good thing, and using emergency TLRP (troubled lands releaf program) would fill in the new shoreline and rebuild all the housing that was lost and then give it back to the former LJ/DM residents who would now be saved from having to sufffer the indiginity of living in Mira Mesa.
They ofcourse would get the material for this by plowing down the houses and mining the materials/ground of all the lazy ungrateful SOB’s who actually paid off their houses instead of ‘doing the smart thing’ and tapping their HELOC’s.June 10, 2009 at 8:54 PM #413767DWCAP
ParticipantNo you cant, cause if it happened the Federal government would step in, declaring coastal housing at high costs a good thing, and using emergency TLRP (troubled lands releaf program) would fill in the new shoreline and rebuild all the housing that was lost and then give it back to the former LJ/DM residents who would now be saved from having to sufffer the indiginity of living in Mira Mesa.
They ofcourse would get the material for this by plowing down the houses and mining the materials/ground of all the lazy ungrateful SOB’s who actually paid off their houses instead of ‘doing the smart thing’ and tapping their HELOC’s.June 10, 2009 at 8:54 PM #414017DWCAP
ParticipantNo you cant, cause if it happened the Federal government would step in, declaring coastal housing at high costs a good thing, and using emergency TLRP (troubled lands releaf program) would fill in the new shoreline and rebuild all the housing that was lost and then give it back to the former LJ/DM residents who would now be saved from having to sufffer the indiginity of living in Mira Mesa.
They ofcourse would get the material for this by plowing down the houses and mining the materials/ground of all the lazy ungrateful SOB’s who actually paid off their houses instead of ‘doing the smart thing’ and tapping their HELOC’s.June 10, 2009 at 8:54 PM #414086DWCAP
ParticipantNo you cant, cause if it happened the Federal government would step in, declaring coastal housing at high costs a good thing, and using emergency TLRP (troubled lands releaf program) would fill in the new shoreline and rebuild all the housing that was lost and then give it back to the former LJ/DM residents who would now be saved from having to sufffer the indiginity of living in Mira Mesa.
They ofcourse would get the material for this by plowing down the houses and mining the materials/ground of all the lazy ungrateful SOB’s who actually paid off their houses instead of ‘doing the smart thing’ and tapping their HELOC’s.June 10, 2009 at 8:54 PM #414238DWCAP
ParticipantNo you cant, cause if it happened the Federal government would step in, declaring coastal housing at high costs a good thing, and using emergency TLRP (troubled lands releaf program) would fill in the new shoreline and rebuild all the housing that was lost and then give it back to the former LJ/DM residents who would now be saved from having to sufffer the indiginity of living in Mira Mesa.
They ofcourse would get the material for this by plowing down the houses and mining the materials/ground of all the lazy ungrateful SOB’s who actually paid off their houses instead of ‘doing the smart thing’ and tapping their HELOC’s.June 10, 2009 at 9:14 PM #413539ocrenter
Participant[img_assist|nid=11283|title=breakup map|desc=|link=node|align=center|width=480|height=600]
The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.
The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.
but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.
so why not divide by four?
or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.
the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.
June 10, 2009 at 9:14 PM #413777ocrenter
Participant[img_assist|nid=11283|title=breakup map|desc=|link=node|align=center|width=480|height=600]
The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.
The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.
but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.
so why not divide by four?
or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.
the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.
June 10, 2009 at 9:14 PM #414027ocrenter
Participant[img_assist|nid=11283|title=breakup map|desc=|link=node|align=center|width=480|height=600]
The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.
The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.
but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.
so why not divide by four?
or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.
the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.
June 10, 2009 at 9:14 PM #414096ocrenter
Participant[img_assist|nid=11283|title=breakup map|desc=|link=node|align=center|width=480|height=600]
The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.
The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.
but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.
so why not divide by four?
or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.
the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.
June 10, 2009 at 9:14 PM #414248ocrenter
Participant[img_assist|nid=11283|title=breakup map|desc=|link=node|align=center|width=480|height=600]
The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.
The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.
but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.
so why not divide by four?
or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.
the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.
June 10, 2009 at 11:20 PM #413642an
Participant[quote=ocrenter]
The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.
but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.
so why not divide by four?
or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.
the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.[/quote]
I would love to throw the race card right back at those who dealt it. White is only the majority in Scripps and La Jolla High. The rest, whites are actually the minority. Even at Scripps and I think La Jolla too, whites do not command 50+% of the population.June 10, 2009 at 11:20 PM #413881an
Participant[quote=ocrenter]
The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.
but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.
so why not divide by four?
or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.
the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.[/quote]
I would love to throw the race card right back at those who dealt it. White is only the majority in Scripps and La Jolla High. The rest, whites are actually the minority. Even at Scripps and I think La Jolla too, whites do not command 50+% of the population.June 10, 2009 at 11:20 PM #414132an
Participant[quote=ocrenter]
The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.
but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.
so why not divide by four?
or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.
the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.[/quote]
I would love to throw the race card right back at those who dealt it. White is only the majority in Scripps and La Jolla High. The rest, whites are actually the minority. Even at Scripps and I think La Jolla too, whites do not command 50+% of the population.June 10, 2009 at 11:20 PM #414200an
Participant[quote=ocrenter]
The breakup is not going to happen, as the first thing that is brought up is race. and when race is brought up, all discussion stop.The issue here is the question of are large school districts truly bad for students. There is some truth to that. when an organization gets to a certain size, by nature layers of bureaucracy start to make changes slow to a craw.
but the coastal vs inland school districts would have similar problems, as they will still be quite large.
so why not divide by four?
or simply maintain the same large district but transfer more power from central administration to individual groupings of schools centered by a high school–in essence, multiple mini school districts.
the coastal vs inland thing is politically dead on arrival. time to move on to a better idea.[/quote]
I would love to throw the race card right back at those who dealt it. White is only the majority in Scripps and La Jolla High. The rest, whites are actually the minority. Even at Scripps and I think La Jolla too, whites do not command 50+% of the population. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.