Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Ritholtz – Financial 2010 Presentation
- This topic has 10 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 21, 2010 at 12:37 PM #17732July 23, 2010 at 9:44 AM #581665
weberlin
ParticipantThanks for posting the link, a very informative presentation. I’m surprised nobody’s chimed in yet.
Question: Slide 19 claims there are $4 Trillion in excess mortgages. Is he saying that $4 Trillion dollars of debt in the mortgage market has no corresponding asset in the real world? In other words, due to shrinking real estate prices, housing collateral is $4 Trillion short of outstanding mortgage debt.
Slide 22 is interesting, too. 12 years to absorb the current excess inventory means housing prices are going to flounder for a long time. But I think we all kind of new that already.
July 23, 2010 at 9:44 AM #581757weberlin
ParticipantThanks for posting the link, a very informative presentation. I’m surprised nobody’s chimed in yet.
Question: Slide 19 claims there are $4 Trillion in excess mortgages. Is he saying that $4 Trillion dollars of debt in the mortgage market has no corresponding asset in the real world? In other words, due to shrinking real estate prices, housing collateral is $4 Trillion short of outstanding mortgage debt.
Slide 22 is interesting, too. 12 years to absorb the current excess inventory means housing prices are going to flounder for a long time. But I think we all kind of new that already.
July 23, 2010 at 9:44 AM #582288weberlin
ParticipantThanks for posting the link, a very informative presentation. I’m surprised nobody’s chimed in yet.
Question: Slide 19 claims there are $4 Trillion in excess mortgages. Is he saying that $4 Trillion dollars of debt in the mortgage market has no corresponding asset in the real world? In other words, due to shrinking real estate prices, housing collateral is $4 Trillion short of outstanding mortgage debt.
Slide 22 is interesting, too. 12 years to absorb the current excess inventory means housing prices are going to flounder for a long time. But I think we all kind of new that already.
July 23, 2010 at 9:44 AM #582395weberlin
ParticipantThanks for posting the link, a very informative presentation. I’m surprised nobody’s chimed in yet.
Question: Slide 19 claims there are $4 Trillion in excess mortgages. Is he saying that $4 Trillion dollars of debt in the mortgage market has no corresponding asset in the real world? In other words, due to shrinking real estate prices, housing collateral is $4 Trillion short of outstanding mortgage debt.
Slide 22 is interesting, too. 12 years to absorb the current excess inventory means housing prices are going to flounder for a long time. But I think we all kind of new that already.
July 23, 2010 at 9:44 AM #582697weberlin
ParticipantThanks for posting the link, a very informative presentation. I’m surprised nobody’s chimed in yet.
Question: Slide 19 claims there are $4 Trillion in excess mortgages. Is he saying that $4 Trillion dollars of debt in the mortgage market has no corresponding asset in the real world? In other words, due to shrinking real estate prices, housing collateral is $4 Trillion short of outstanding mortgage debt.
Slide 22 is interesting, too. 12 years to absorb the current excess inventory means housing prices are going to flounder for a long time. But I think we all kind of new that already.
July 23, 2010 at 2:24 PM #581900patb
Participanti believe your interpretation is correct, that
there are mortgages where the LTV exceeds 100%
and that it’s 4 trillion.and the excess inventory is a little odd in that nevada has 100 years excess inventory while
NYC only maybe has 6 months.July 23, 2010 at 2:24 PM #581991patb
Participanti believe your interpretation is correct, that
there are mortgages where the LTV exceeds 100%
and that it’s 4 trillion.and the excess inventory is a little odd in that nevada has 100 years excess inventory while
NYC only maybe has 6 months.July 23, 2010 at 2:24 PM #582523patb
Participanti believe your interpretation is correct, that
there are mortgages where the LTV exceeds 100%
and that it’s 4 trillion.and the excess inventory is a little odd in that nevada has 100 years excess inventory while
NYC only maybe has 6 months.July 23, 2010 at 2:24 PM #582630patb
Participanti believe your interpretation is correct, that
there are mortgages where the LTV exceeds 100%
and that it’s 4 trillion.and the excess inventory is a little odd in that nevada has 100 years excess inventory while
NYC only maybe has 6 months.July 23, 2010 at 2:24 PM #582933patb
Participanti believe your interpretation is correct, that
there are mortgages where the LTV exceeds 100%
and that it’s 4 trillion.and the excess inventory is a little odd in that nevada has 100 years excess inventory while
NYC only maybe has 6 months. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
