- This topic has 184 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by
NicMM.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 18, 2011 at 8:17 AM #656348January 18, 2011 at 2:40 PM #655520
SD Realtor
ParticipantNothing makes them more special effective demand. The truth of the matter is that I don’t really care. The other truth is that for the handyman making 30k a year, that 900 buck job that he may or may not have reported income on is more important to him then to me. The bottom line is that this policy will probably hurt many lower wage earners then the wealthier people that employ them. Again, I don’t really care one way or another, but I know alot of people in those shoes and they are pretty unhappy about it.
January 18, 2011 at 2:40 PM #655582SD Realtor
ParticipantNothing makes them more special effective demand. The truth of the matter is that I don’t really care. The other truth is that for the handyman making 30k a year, that 900 buck job that he may or may not have reported income on is more important to him then to me. The bottom line is that this policy will probably hurt many lower wage earners then the wealthier people that employ them. Again, I don’t really care one way or another, but I know alot of people in those shoes and they are pretty unhappy about it.
January 18, 2011 at 2:40 PM #656179SD Realtor
ParticipantNothing makes them more special effective demand. The truth of the matter is that I don’t really care. The other truth is that for the handyman making 30k a year, that 900 buck job that he may or may not have reported income on is more important to him then to me. The bottom line is that this policy will probably hurt many lower wage earners then the wealthier people that employ them. Again, I don’t really care one way or another, but I know alot of people in those shoes and they are pretty unhappy about it.
January 18, 2011 at 2:40 PM #656319SD Realtor
ParticipantNothing makes them more special effective demand. The truth of the matter is that I don’t really care. The other truth is that for the handyman making 30k a year, that 900 buck job that he may or may not have reported income on is more important to him then to me. The bottom line is that this policy will probably hurt many lower wage earners then the wealthier people that employ them. Again, I don’t really care one way or another, but I know alot of people in those shoes and they are pretty unhappy about it.
January 18, 2011 at 2:40 PM #656647SD Realtor
ParticipantNothing makes them more special effective demand. The truth of the matter is that I don’t really care. The other truth is that for the handyman making 30k a year, that 900 buck job that he may or may not have reported income on is more important to him then to me. The bottom line is that this policy will probably hurt many lower wage earners then the wealthier people that employ them. Again, I don’t really care one way or another, but I know alot of people in those shoes and they are pretty unhappy about it.
January 18, 2011 at 3:29 PM #655540Anonymous
GuestSDR,
You do realize that you are making the case for progressive income tax rates…a first step toward socialism?
January 18, 2011 at 3:29 PM #655602Anonymous
GuestSDR,
You do realize that you are making the case for progressive income tax rates…a first step toward socialism?
January 18, 2011 at 3:29 PM #656200Anonymous
GuestSDR,
You do realize that you are making the case for progressive income tax rates…a first step toward socialism?
January 18, 2011 at 3:29 PM #656339Anonymous
GuestSDR,
You do realize that you are making the case for progressive income tax rates…a first step toward socialism?
January 18, 2011 at 3:29 PM #656667Anonymous
GuestSDR,
You do realize that you are making the case for progressive income tax rates…a first step toward socialism?
January 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM #655560Effective Demand
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Nothing makes them more special effective demand. The truth of the matter is that I don’t really care. The other truth is that for the handyman making 30k a year, that 900 buck job that he may or may not have reported income on is more important to him then to me. The bottom line is that this policy will probably hurt many lower wage earners then the wealthier people that employ them. Again, I don’t really care one way or another, but I know alot of people in those shoes and they are pretty unhappy about it.[/quote]
This will only hurt those being dishonest and not reporting income. Suprisingly, I’m ok with that.
January 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM #655622Effective Demand
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Nothing makes them more special effective demand. The truth of the matter is that I don’t really care. The other truth is that for the handyman making 30k a year, that 900 buck job that he may or may not have reported income on is more important to him then to me. The bottom line is that this policy will probably hurt many lower wage earners then the wealthier people that employ them. Again, I don’t really care one way or another, but I know alot of people in those shoes and they are pretty unhappy about it.[/quote]
This will only hurt those being dishonest and not reporting income. Suprisingly, I’m ok with that.
January 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM #656220Effective Demand
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Nothing makes them more special effective demand. The truth of the matter is that I don’t really care. The other truth is that for the handyman making 30k a year, that 900 buck job that he may or may not have reported income on is more important to him then to me. The bottom line is that this policy will probably hurt many lower wage earners then the wealthier people that employ them. Again, I don’t really care one way or another, but I know alot of people in those shoes and they are pretty unhappy about it.[/quote]
This will only hurt those being dishonest and not reporting income. Suprisingly, I’m ok with that.
January 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM #656359Effective Demand
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]Nothing makes them more special effective demand. The truth of the matter is that I don’t really care. The other truth is that for the handyman making 30k a year, that 900 buck job that he may or may not have reported income on is more important to him then to me. The bottom line is that this policy will probably hurt many lower wage earners then the wealthier people that employ them. Again, I don’t really care one way or another, but I know alot of people in those shoes and they are pretty unhappy about it.[/quote]
This will only hurt those being dishonest and not reporting income. Suprisingly, I’m ok with that.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
