- This topic has 155 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
bearishgurl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 2, 2010 at 6:26 PM #600715September 2, 2010 at 6:48 PM #599668
briansd1
Guest[quote=UCGal][quote=briansd1]How about documenting everything and submitting a complaint to the DRE?
http://dre.ca.gov/cons_complaint.html
[/quote]
I think it’s better to report it to the corporate relo company.
Also – if the transaction was not in CA (it’s not clear it was CA) then reporting to CA’s DRE won’t do anything.[/quote]
One does not preclude the other. States all have real estate regulatory agencies.
What the OP does depends on how much he wants the Realtor “punished”.
Bring suit against the Realtor, contact the police and district attorney if there’s evidence of fraud, contact his Broker, the relocation company, etc…
September 2, 2010 at 6:48 PM #599759briansd1
Guest[quote=UCGal][quote=briansd1]How about documenting everything and submitting a complaint to the DRE?
http://dre.ca.gov/cons_complaint.html
[/quote]
I think it’s better to report it to the corporate relo company.
Also – if the transaction was not in CA (it’s not clear it was CA) then reporting to CA’s DRE won’t do anything.[/quote]
One does not preclude the other. States all have real estate regulatory agencies.
What the OP does depends on how much he wants the Realtor “punished”.
Bring suit against the Realtor, contact the police and district attorney if there’s evidence of fraud, contact his Broker, the relocation company, etc…
September 2, 2010 at 6:48 PM #600305briansd1
Guest[quote=UCGal][quote=briansd1]How about documenting everything and submitting a complaint to the DRE?
http://dre.ca.gov/cons_complaint.html
[/quote]
I think it’s better to report it to the corporate relo company.
Also – if the transaction was not in CA (it’s not clear it was CA) then reporting to CA’s DRE won’t do anything.[/quote]
One does not preclude the other. States all have real estate regulatory agencies.
What the OP does depends on how much he wants the Realtor “punished”.
Bring suit against the Realtor, contact the police and district attorney if there’s evidence of fraud, contact his Broker, the relocation company, etc…
September 2, 2010 at 6:48 PM #600412briansd1
Guest[quote=UCGal][quote=briansd1]How about documenting everything and submitting a complaint to the DRE?
http://dre.ca.gov/cons_complaint.html
[/quote]
I think it’s better to report it to the corporate relo company.
Also – if the transaction was not in CA (it’s not clear it was CA) then reporting to CA’s DRE won’t do anything.[/quote]
One does not preclude the other. States all have real estate regulatory agencies.
What the OP does depends on how much he wants the Realtor “punished”.
Bring suit against the Realtor, contact the police and district attorney if there’s evidence of fraud, contact his Broker, the relocation company, etc…
September 2, 2010 at 6:48 PM #600730briansd1
Guest[quote=UCGal][quote=briansd1]How about documenting everything and submitting a complaint to the DRE?
http://dre.ca.gov/cons_complaint.html
[/quote]
I think it’s better to report it to the corporate relo company.
Also – if the transaction was not in CA (it’s not clear it was CA) then reporting to CA’s DRE won’t do anything.[/quote]
One does not preclude the other. States all have real estate regulatory agencies.
What the OP does depends on how much he wants the Realtor “punished”.
Bring suit against the Realtor, contact the police and district attorney if there’s evidence of fraud, contact his Broker, the relocation company, etc…
September 2, 2010 at 7:55 PM #599683moneymaker
ParticipantThe ethical thing to do is bring the situation to light with all involved parties. Unfortunately many laws and regulations have no teeth unless someone is willing to take the perp to court and herein lies the problem. Many people will not risk court for the principle,unfortunately. DA would probably not consider going after them especially with you out of state, unless s/he has other complaints/cases. Keep us posted on the outcome.
September 2, 2010 at 7:55 PM #599774moneymaker
ParticipantThe ethical thing to do is bring the situation to light with all involved parties. Unfortunately many laws and regulations have no teeth unless someone is willing to take the perp to court and herein lies the problem. Many people will not risk court for the principle,unfortunately. DA would probably not consider going after them especially with you out of state, unless s/he has other complaints/cases. Keep us posted on the outcome.
September 2, 2010 at 7:55 PM #600320moneymaker
ParticipantThe ethical thing to do is bring the situation to light with all involved parties. Unfortunately many laws and regulations have no teeth unless someone is willing to take the perp to court and herein lies the problem. Many people will not risk court for the principle,unfortunately. DA would probably not consider going after them especially with you out of state, unless s/he has other complaints/cases. Keep us posted on the outcome.
September 2, 2010 at 7:55 PM #600427moneymaker
ParticipantThe ethical thing to do is bring the situation to light with all involved parties. Unfortunately many laws and regulations have no teeth unless someone is willing to take the perp to court and herein lies the problem. Many people will not risk court for the principle,unfortunately. DA would probably not consider going after them especially with you out of state, unless s/he has other complaints/cases. Keep us posted on the outcome.
September 2, 2010 at 7:55 PM #600745moneymaker
ParticipantThe ethical thing to do is bring the situation to light with all involved parties. Unfortunately many laws and regulations have no teeth unless someone is willing to take the perp to court and herein lies the problem. Many people will not risk court for the principle,unfortunately. DA would probably not consider going after them especially with you out of state, unless s/he has other complaints/cases. Keep us posted on the outcome.
September 2, 2010 at 8:57 PM #599718sdrealtor
ParticipantIt wouldnt get to court. Agent would be smart to settle quickly and quietly. If not it would likely go to mediation then arbitration.
September 2, 2010 at 8:57 PM #599809sdrealtor
ParticipantIt wouldnt get to court. Agent would be smart to settle quickly and quietly. If not it would likely go to mediation then arbitration.
September 2, 2010 at 8:57 PM #600355sdrealtor
ParticipantIt wouldnt get to court. Agent would be smart to settle quickly and quietly. If not it would likely go to mediation then arbitration.
September 2, 2010 at 8:57 PM #600462sdrealtor
ParticipantIt wouldnt get to court. Agent would be smart to settle quickly and quietly. If not it would likely go to mediation then arbitration.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
