“The Worst Is Yet to Come”: If You’re Not Petrified, You’re Not Paying Attention”

[Allan from Fallbrook]

CA renter: Excellent post, yourself. Thanks for the props.

I think you make an excellent distinction, too, and that of the gulf between workers/employees and management/owners. I certainly don’t want to sound like a Marxist here, but our political “leaders” have either idly sat back and watched as America bled jobs and entire industries overseas or aided and abetted the effort.

Unfortunately, for all of his florid rhetoric to the contrary, Obama doesn’t appear any different. His ham handed approach to Chrysler shows exactly how wrong headed he is. To screw over the company bondholders while not allowing even a cursory review or discussion of the UAW collective bargaining agreement shows where his loyalties and his ideology remain.

[NotCranky]

Florid is nice.

[NotCranky]

Florid is nice.

[NotCranky]

Florid is nice.

[NotCranky]

Florid is nice.

[NotCranky]

Florid is nice.

[ibjames]

I went to Temecula this weekend for a wedding, I thought it was nice! :shrug:

[ibjames]

I went to Temecula this weekend for a wedding, I thought it was nice! :shrug:

[ibjames]

I went to Temecula this weekend for a wedding, I thought it was nice! :shrug:

[ibjames]

I went to Temecula this weekend for a wedding, I thought it was nice! :shrug:

[ibjames]

I went to Temecula this weekend for a wedding, I thought it was nice! :shrug:

[Anonymous]

A common theme I hear in this thread (and many other discussions about politics/the economy) is that jobs and prosperity are one in the same. It’s not that simple.

It’s easy to establish a policy that creates jobs. (North Korea does it better than anybody). But wealth/prosperity/standard-of-living are harder things to create and sustain.

Labor shifts from one nation to another can be good or bad for either. They can also be good for both sides, but many people only want to see it as “us vs. them.”

[Anonymous]

A common theme I hear in this thread (and many other discussions about politics/the economy) is that jobs and prosperity are one in the same. It’s not that simple.

It’s easy to establish a policy that creates jobs. (North Korea does it better than anybody). But wealth/prosperity/standard-of-living are harder things to create and sustain.

Labor shifts from one nation to another can be good or bad for either. They can also be good for both sides, but many people only want to see it as “us vs. them.”

[Anonymous]

A common theme I hear in this thread (and many other discussions about politics/the economy) is that jobs and prosperity are one in the same. It’s not that simple.

It’s easy to establish a policy that creates jobs. (North Korea does it better than anybody). But wealth/prosperity/standard-of-living are harder things to create and sustain.

Labor shifts from one nation to another can be good or bad for either. They can also be good for both sides, but many people only want to see it as “us vs. them.”

[Anonymous]

A common theme I hear in this thread (and many other discussions about politics/the economy) is that jobs and prosperity are one in the same. It’s not that simple.

It’s easy to establish a policy that creates jobs. (North Korea does it better than anybody). But wealth/prosperity/standard-of-living are harder things to create and sustain.

Labor shifts from one nation to another can be good or bad for either. They can also be good for both sides, but many people only want to see it as “us vs. them.”

[Author]

Posts