- This topic has 100 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 9, 2010 at 6:00 PM #501477January 9, 2010 at 7:11 PM #500602
sd_matt
ParticipantI wonder why Rush and Hannity are continuing to paint Obama as an ideologue when he is first and foremost a bankster crony.
Are they trying to prevent us from seeing the pattern lest we apply our lessons to the Repubs too? Either way it is indoctrination radio. It kills me that audiences give their ears to these pieces of crap and not more to people like Bill Handel.
Just thinking.
January 9, 2010 at 7:11 PM #500752sd_matt
ParticipantI wonder why Rush and Hannity are continuing to paint Obama as an ideologue when he is first and foremost a bankster crony.
Are they trying to prevent us from seeing the pattern lest we apply our lessons to the Repubs too? Either way it is indoctrination radio. It kills me that audiences give their ears to these pieces of crap and not more to people like Bill Handel.
Just thinking.
January 9, 2010 at 7:11 PM #501148sd_matt
ParticipantI wonder why Rush and Hannity are continuing to paint Obama as an ideologue when he is first and foremost a bankster crony.
Are they trying to prevent us from seeing the pattern lest we apply our lessons to the Repubs too? Either way it is indoctrination radio. It kills me that audiences give their ears to these pieces of crap and not more to people like Bill Handel.
Just thinking.
January 9, 2010 at 7:11 PM #501241sd_matt
ParticipantI wonder why Rush and Hannity are continuing to paint Obama as an ideologue when he is first and foremost a bankster crony.
Are they trying to prevent us from seeing the pattern lest we apply our lessons to the Repubs too? Either way it is indoctrination radio. It kills me that audiences give their ears to these pieces of crap and not more to people like Bill Handel.
Just thinking.
January 9, 2010 at 7:11 PM #501487sd_matt
ParticipantI wonder why Rush and Hannity are continuing to paint Obama as an ideologue when he is first and foremost a bankster crony.
Are they trying to prevent us from seeing the pattern lest we apply our lessons to the Repubs too? Either way it is indoctrination radio. It kills me that audiences give their ears to these pieces of crap and not more to people like Bill Handel.
Just thinking.
January 9, 2010 at 8:32 PM #500612patientrenter
Participant[quote=sd_matt]I wonder why Rush and Hannity are continuing to paint Obama as an ideologue when he is first and foremost a bankster crony.
Are they trying to prevent us from seeing the pattern lest we apply our lessons to the Repubs too?….[/quote]
Bingo.
January 9, 2010 at 8:32 PM #500762patientrenter
Participant[quote=sd_matt]I wonder why Rush and Hannity are continuing to paint Obama as an ideologue when he is first and foremost a bankster crony.
Are they trying to prevent us from seeing the pattern lest we apply our lessons to the Repubs too?….[/quote]
Bingo.
January 9, 2010 at 8:32 PM #501157patientrenter
Participant[quote=sd_matt]I wonder why Rush and Hannity are continuing to paint Obama as an ideologue when he is first and foremost a bankster crony.
Are they trying to prevent us from seeing the pattern lest we apply our lessons to the Repubs too?….[/quote]
Bingo.
January 9, 2010 at 8:32 PM #501251patientrenter
Participant[quote=sd_matt]I wonder why Rush and Hannity are continuing to paint Obama as an ideologue when he is first and foremost a bankster crony.
Are they trying to prevent us from seeing the pattern lest we apply our lessons to the Repubs too?….[/quote]
Bingo.
January 9, 2010 at 8:32 PM #501497patientrenter
Participant[quote=sd_matt]I wonder why Rush and Hannity are continuing to paint Obama as an ideologue when he is first and foremost a bankster crony.
Are they trying to prevent us from seeing the pattern lest we apply our lessons to the Repubs too?….[/quote]
Bingo.
January 9, 2010 at 8:53 PM #500617poorgradstudent
ParticipantBrown’s chances are greater than zero and a lot worse than 50-50.
I’d put his odds at somewhere from 5-10% right now. In an ordinary election a Republican would have zero chance of winning. But special elections about about turnout even more so than normal elections. Bad weather can discourage middle of the road voters. I guess we’ll see what happens.
January 9, 2010 at 8:53 PM #500767poorgradstudent
ParticipantBrown’s chances are greater than zero and a lot worse than 50-50.
I’d put his odds at somewhere from 5-10% right now. In an ordinary election a Republican would have zero chance of winning. But special elections about about turnout even more so than normal elections. Bad weather can discourage middle of the road voters. I guess we’ll see what happens.
January 9, 2010 at 8:53 PM #501162poorgradstudent
ParticipantBrown’s chances are greater than zero and a lot worse than 50-50.
I’d put his odds at somewhere from 5-10% right now. In an ordinary election a Republican would have zero chance of winning. But special elections about about turnout even more so than normal elections. Bad weather can discourage middle of the road voters. I guess we’ll see what happens.
January 9, 2010 at 8:53 PM #501256poorgradstudent
ParticipantBrown’s chances are greater than zero and a lot worse than 50-50.
I’d put his odds at somewhere from 5-10% right now. In an ordinary election a Republican would have zero chance of winning. But special elections about about turnout even more so than normal elections. Bad weather can discourage middle of the road voters. I guess we’ll see what happens.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
