- This topic has 420 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by
maktbone.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 19, 2009 at 10:06 AM #402687May 19, 2009 at 10:28 AM #402026
temeculaguy
Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]
I have a simple theory. Homes are much more affordable than they have been in a long time.
[/quote]Life is not complex. We are complex. Life is simple, and the simple thing is the right thing.
– Oscar WildeSometimes it’s hard to take a step back and see the obvious, I like your theory, it takes me 700 words to say the same thing, even then it is convoluted, brevity is not my strong suit.
SD, I thought you’d like the laker’s analogy, it was intended that way.
May 19, 2009 at 10:28 AM #402278temeculaguy
Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]
I have a simple theory. Homes are much more affordable than they have been in a long time.
[/quote]Life is not complex. We are complex. Life is simple, and the simple thing is the right thing.
– Oscar WildeSometimes it’s hard to take a step back and see the obvious, I like your theory, it takes me 700 words to say the same thing, even then it is convoluted, brevity is not my strong suit.
SD, I thought you’d like the laker’s analogy, it was intended that way.
May 19, 2009 at 10:28 AM #402510temeculaguy
Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]
I have a simple theory. Homes are much more affordable than they have been in a long time.
[/quote]Life is not complex. We are complex. Life is simple, and the simple thing is the right thing.
– Oscar WildeSometimes it’s hard to take a step back and see the obvious, I like your theory, it takes me 700 words to say the same thing, even then it is convoluted, brevity is not my strong suit.
SD, I thought you’d like the laker’s analogy, it was intended that way.
May 19, 2009 at 10:28 AM #402569temeculaguy
Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]
I have a simple theory. Homes are much more affordable than they have been in a long time.
[/quote]Life is not complex. We are complex. Life is simple, and the simple thing is the right thing.
– Oscar WildeSometimes it’s hard to take a step back and see the obvious, I like your theory, it takes me 700 words to say the same thing, even then it is convoluted, brevity is not my strong suit.
SD, I thought you’d like the laker’s analogy, it was intended that way.
May 19, 2009 at 10:28 AM #402717temeculaguy
Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]
I have a simple theory. Homes are much more affordable than they have been in a long time.
[/quote]Life is not complex. We are complex. Life is simple, and the simple thing is the right thing.
– Oscar WildeSometimes it’s hard to take a step back and see the obvious, I like your theory, it takes me 700 words to say the same thing, even then it is convoluted, brevity is not my strong suit.
SD, I thought you’d like the laker’s analogy, it was intended that way.
May 19, 2009 at 10:45 AM #402046scaredyclassic
Participantit’s not simple. it’s pretty complex. it’s impossible to predict any market short term. we may have some degree of confidence of where a market is going, but the way it gets there can be very surprising and the timing can be impossible to pin down. i’d say even if you knwo witha high degree of confidence that the general trajectory is down, you can be very surprised at the circuitous path it takes to get there. or as the late Kurt vonegut said, I think more or less, “Sometimes you ahve to go a very long ways out of your way to go a short ways correctly”.
May 19, 2009 at 10:45 AM #402298scaredyclassic
Participantit’s not simple. it’s pretty complex. it’s impossible to predict any market short term. we may have some degree of confidence of where a market is going, but the way it gets there can be very surprising and the timing can be impossible to pin down. i’d say even if you knwo witha high degree of confidence that the general trajectory is down, you can be very surprised at the circuitous path it takes to get there. or as the late Kurt vonegut said, I think more or less, “Sometimes you ahve to go a very long ways out of your way to go a short ways correctly”.
May 19, 2009 at 10:45 AM #402530scaredyclassic
Participantit’s not simple. it’s pretty complex. it’s impossible to predict any market short term. we may have some degree of confidence of where a market is going, but the way it gets there can be very surprising and the timing can be impossible to pin down. i’d say even if you knwo witha high degree of confidence that the general trajectory is down, you can be very surprised at the circuitous path it takes to get there. or as the late Kurt vonegut said, I think more or less, “Sometimes you ahve to go a very long ways out of your way to go a short ways correctly”.
May 19, 2009 at 10:45 AM #402589scaredyclassic
Participantit’s not simple. it’s pretty complex. it’s impossible to predict any market short term. we may have some degree of confidence of where a market is going, but the way it gets there can be very surprising and the timing can be impossible to pin down. i’d say even if you knwo witha high degree of confidence that the general trajectory is down, you can be very surprised at the circuitous path it takes to get there. or as the late Kurt vonegut said, I think more or less, “Sometimes you ahve to go a very long ways out of your way to go a short ways correctly”.
May 19, 2009 at 10:45 AM #402737scaredyclassic
Participantit’s not simple. it’s pretty complex. it’s impossible to predict any market short term. we may have some degree of confidence of where a market is going, but the way it gets there can be very surprising and the timing can be impossible to pin down. i’d say even if you knwo witha high degree of confidence that the general trajectory is down, you can be very surprised at the circuitous path it takes to get there. or as the late Kurt vonegut said, I think more or less, “Sometimes you ahve to go a very long ways out of your way to go a short ways correctly”.
May 19, 2009 at 11:06 AM #402056peterb
ParticipantTheories should have some analytical basis as support. Consider the logic, place your bets. History may not exactly repeat itself, but it sure does tend to rhyme.
Here’s a couple that I find compelling:http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/
http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2009/el2009-16.pdf
May 19, 2009 at 11:06 AM #402308peterb
ParticipantTheories should have some analytical basis as support. Consider the logic, place your bets. History may not exactly repeat itself, but it sure does tend to rhyme.
Here’s a couple that I find compelling:http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/
http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2009/el2009-16.pdf
May 19, 2009 at 11:06 AM #402540peterb
ParticipantTheories should have some analytical basis as support. Consider the logic, place your bets. History may not exactly repeat itself, but it sure does tend to rhyme.
Here’s a couple that I find compelling:http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/
http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2009/el2009-16.pdf
May 19, 2009 at 11:06 AM #402599peterb
ParticipantTheories should have some analytical basis as support. Consider the logic, place your bets. History may not exactly repeat itself, but it sure does tend to rhyme.
Here’s a couple that I find compelling:http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/
http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2009/el2009-16.pdf
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
