Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › “Ideal networth formula”
- This topic has 85 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 2, 2009 at 2:45 PM #476671November 2, 2009 at 3:17 PM #477535IT.MOMParticipant
Is investing in RE a good way to fight off the in coming inflation? Any other good way for us to protect our nest egg? Is cash still the king?
November 2, 2009 at 3:17 PM #477312IT.MOMParticipantIs investing in RE a good way to fight off the in coming inflation? Any other good way for us to protect our nest egg? Is cash still the king?
November 2, 2009 at 3:17 PM #476696IT.MOMParticipantIs investing in RE a good way to fight off the in coming inflation? Any other good way for us to protect our nest egg? Is cash still the king?
November 2, 2009 at 3:17 PM #476869IT.MOMParticipantIs investing in RE a good way to fight off the in coming inflation? Any other good way for us to protect our nest egg? Is cash still the king?
November 2, 2009 at 3:17 PM #477235IT.MOMParticipantIs investing in RE a good way to fight off the in coming inflation? Any other good way for us to protect our nest egg? Is cash still the king?
November 3, 2009 at 8:35 AM #476773(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantExcellent points carlsbadworker.
Wealth accumulation is not linear with time (age). If one is saving and growing a nest egg, it should follow a growth curve.
I think that would be too complicated for the audience targets by the millionaire next door, so he uses an approximation that probably makes sense for people in the ~ 40-50 age range.November 3, 2009 at 8:35 AM #477390(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantExcellent points carlsbadworker.
Wealth accumulation is not linear with time (age). If one is saving and growing a nest egg, it should follow a growth curve.
I think that would be too complicated for the audience targets by the millionaire next door, so he uses an approximation that probably makes sense for people in the ~ 40-50 age range.November 3, 2009 at 8:35 AM #477311(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantExcellent points carlsbadworker.
Wealth accumulation is not linear with time (age). If one is saving and growing a nest egg, it should follow a growth curve.
I think that would be too complicated for the audience targets by the millionaire next door, so he uses an approximation that probably makes sense for people in the ~ 40-50 age range.November 3, 2009 at 8:35 AM #476945(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantExcellent points carlsbadworker.
Wealth accumulation is not linear with time (age). If one is saving and growing a nest egg, it should follow a growth curve.
I think that would be too complicated for the audience targets by the millionaire next door, so he uses an approximation that probably makes sense for people in the ~ 40-50 age range.November 3, 2009 at 8:35 AM #477611(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantExcellent points carlsbadworker.
Wealth accumulation is not linear with time (age). If one is saving and growing a nest egg, it should follow a growth curve.
I think that would be too complicated for the audience targets by the millionaire next door, so he uses an approximation that probably makes sense for people in the ~ 40-50 age range. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.