- This topic has 365 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 6, 2009 at 11:31 AM #465383October 6, 2009 at 11:33 AM #464583sdrealtorParticipant
Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.
I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.
I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!
You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…
October 6, 2009 at 11:33 AM #464769sdrealtorParticipantNow we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.
I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.
I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!
You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…
October 6, 2009 at 11:33 AM #465116sdrealtorParticipantNow we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.
I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.
I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!
You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…
October 6, 2009 at 11:33 AM #465187sdrealtorParticipantNow we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.
I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.
I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!
You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…
October 6, 2009 at 11:33 AM #465393sdrealtorParticipantNow we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.
I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.
I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!
You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…
October 6, 2009 at 11:36 AM #464593jameswennParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.
I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.
I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!
You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…[/quote]
I don’t think either of you are wrong, but each 2nd mortgage holder handles things differently, depending on their objectives at the time.
October 6, 2009 at 11:36 AM #464779jameswennParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.
I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.
I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!
You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…[/quote]
I don’t think either of you are wrong, but each 2nd mortgage holder handles things differently, depending on their objectives at the time.
October 6, 2009 at 11:36 AM #465126jameswennParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.
I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.
I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!
You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…[/quote]
I don’t think either of you are wrong, but each 2nd mortgage holder handles things differently, depending on their objectives at the time.
October 6, 2009 at 11:36 AM #465198jameswennParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.
I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.
I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!
You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…[/quote]
I don’t think either of you are wrong, but each 2nd mortgage holder handles things differently, depending on their objectives at the time.
October 6, 2009 at 11:36 AM #465403jameswennParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.
I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.
I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!
You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…[/quote]
I don’t think either of you are wrong, but each 2nd mortgage holder handles things differently, depending on their objectives at the time.
October 6, 2009 at 12:10 PM #464623Rt.66Participant[quote=sdrealtor]Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.
I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.
I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!
You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…[/quote]
How convenient that your example was a short sale but you “say” they could have chosen to keep the house. If they could have kept the home or if they sold the home by “choice” why the need for a short sale? WTF?
You have a very loose definition of proof. As always with you we are left being asked to trust what you say is true, that’s not going to happen, and each post you make exemplifies why.
Dude this is not a difficult concept to grasp. I do not want your word or opinion, I want a real source. No more “I’ve seen with my own eyes” BS, please. No “it’s a short sale but did not have to be”, how believable is that? No “I’ve seen it but it’s in someone else’s office”. Shit how hard is this?
I’ve searched the internet and can’t find anything to support your story. Not saying it isn’t there but I sure have tried and can’t find anything. That’s pretty telling and if your story had even the remotest relationship with truth and was happening in appreciable numbers you’d think there would be something out there.
That Xmas letter fable reeks of BS.
Is anyone buying this crap from this guy?
Hey, I have seen with my own eyes documentation showing that all the top banks have policies to never allow a debtor to remain in a home long term if they are not meeting obligations to a second mortgage holder. I’ve seen it with my own eyes and by your standards that’s proof it’s true!
I would post it right now but its locked in the CEOs office.
I guess I’ll argue like you and see how many people give me a pass.
October 6, 2009 at 12:10 PM #464809Rt.66Participant[quote=sdrealtor]Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.
I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.
I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!
You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…[/quote]
How convenient that your example was a short sale but you “say” they could have chosen to keep the house. If they could have kept the home or if they sold the home by “choice” why the need for a short sale? WTF?
You have a very loose definition of proof. As always with you we are left being asked to trust what you say is true, that’s not going to happen, and each post you make exemplifies why.
Dude this is not a difficult concept to grasp. I do not want your word or opinion, I want a real source. No more “I’ve seen with my own eyes” BS, please. No “it’s a short sale but did not have to be”, how believable is that? No “I’ve seen it but it’s in someone else’s office”. Shit how hard is this?
I’ve searched the internet and can’t find anything to support your story. Not saying it isn’t there but I sure have tried and can’t find anything. That’s pretty telling and if your story had even the remotest relationship with truth and was happening in appreciable numbers you’d think there would be something out there.
That Xmas letter fable reeks of BS.
Is anyone buying this crap from this guy?
Hey, I have seen with my own eyes documentation showing that all the top banks have policies to never allow a debtor to remain in a home long term if they are not meeting obligations to a second mortgage holder. I’ve seen it with my own eyes and by your standards that’s proof it’s true!
I would post it right now but its locked in the CEOs office.
I guess I’ll argue like you and see how many people give me a pass.
October 6, 2009 at 12:10 PM #465156Rt.66Participant[quote=sdrealtor]Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.
I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.
I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!
You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…[/quote]
How convenient that your example was a short sale but you “say” they could have chosen to keep the house. If they could have kept the home or if they sold the home by “choice” why the need for a short sale? WTF?
You have a very loose definition of proof. As always with you we are left being asked to trust what you say is true, that’s not going to happen, and each post you make exemplifies why.
Dude this is not a difficult concept to grasp. I do not want your word or opinion, I want a real source. No more “I’ve seen with my own eyes” BS, please. No “it’s a short sale but did not have to be”, how believable is that? No “I’ve seen it but it’s in someone else’s office”. Shit how hard is this?
I’ve searched the internet and can’t find anything to support your story. Not saying it isn’t there but I sure have tried and can’t find anything. That’s pretty telling and if your story had even the remotest relationship with truth and was happening in appreciable numbers you’d think there would be something out there.
That Xmas letter fable reeks of BS.
Is anyone buying this crap from this guy?
Hey, I have seen with my own eyes documentation showing that all the top banks have policies to never allow a debtor to remain in a home long term if they are not meeting obligations to a second mortgage holder. I’ve seen it with my own eyes and by your standards that’s proof it’s true!
I would post it right now but its locked in the CEOs office.
I guess I’ll argue like you and see how many people give me a pass.
October 6, 2009 at 12:10 PM #465227Rt.66Participant[quote=sdrealtor]Now we all know you are full of it. I have concrete proof of a 2nd that negotiated a short payoff outside of a short sale and you cant accept that you are wrong. It was not a short sale or foreclosure when they negotiated the short payoff on the 2nd. They resolved their 2nd for pennies on the dollar. It was done! They had a pass as you say. They had the option to stay with a de facto principal reduction but chose not to. They did not lose the home, they sold the home by choice.
I have the documentation because a sale was ultimately involved. There are other cases of the 2nd getting settled and the 1st modifying by my associate which I dont have access to because they arent my clients but I have seen many of them.
I have seen letters sent to borrowers offering these kinds of payoffs without the borrower even asking for one. I had a client that owed $105K on a 2nd who stopped paying it. They got a Xmas letter last Dec saying send us $6,000 and you are done…d….o…n…e…DONE!!!
You asked for proof, I have it ready to send to you but you cant admit you are wrong. It must really suck to be you. Good Bye asswipe…[/quote]
How convenient that your example was a short sale but you “say” they could have chosen to keep the house. If they could have kept the home or if they sold the home by “choice” why the need for a short sale? WTF?
You have a very loose definition of proof. As always with you we are left being asked to trust what you say is true, that’s not going to happen, and each post you make exemplifies why.
Dude this is not a difficult concept to grasp. I do not want your word or opinion, I want a real source. No more “I’ve seen with my own eyes” BS, please. No “it’s a short sale but did not have to be”, how believable is that? No “I’ve seen it but it’s in someone else’s office”. Shit how hard is this?
I’ve searched the internet and can’t find anything to support your story. Not saying it isn’t there but I sure have tried and can’t find anything. That’s pretty telling and if your story had even the remotest relationship with truth and was happening in appreciable numbers you’d think there would be something out there.
That Xmas letter fable reeks of BS.
Is anyone buying this crap from this guy?
Hey, I have seen with my own eyes documentation showing that all the top banks have policies to never allow a debtor to remain in a home long term if they are not meeting obligations to a second mortgage holder. I’ve seen it with my own eyes and by your standards that’s proof it’s true!
I would post it right now but its locked in the CEOs office.
I guess I’ll argue like you and see how many people give me a pass.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.