Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Prop 30 passes… Get ready to bend over…..
- This topic has 76 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by
paramount.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 7, 2012 at 7:30 AM #20253November 7, 2012 at 7:32 AM #753919
CoronitaParticipant…Now where are my unrealized capital losses that I’ve been saving just for a situation like this…..
November 7, 2012 at 8:28 AM #753931no_such_reality
ParticipantSo flu, you have two choices:
1. make less money
2. make more moneyIf you make 10% more, you’ll have a percent or two more after tax money to spend.
If you make less, you’ll have less.
November 7, 2012 at 8:33 AM #753933
CoronitaParticipant[quote=no_such_reality]So flu, you have two choices:
1. make less money
2. make more moneyIf you make 10% more, you’ll have a percent or two more after tax money to spend.
If you make less, you’ll have less.[/quote]
I guess the poway school district board members get a raise this year afterall? 🙂
November 7, 2012 at 9:45 AM #753974XBoxBoy
ParticipantYou ain’t seen nothing yet. Democrats will have super-majorities in both houses of the California legislature after this election. Let the taxing and spending begin!!!
November 7, 2012 at 9:54 AM #753979no_such_reality
Participant[quote=XBoxBoy]You ain’t seen nothing yet. Democrats will have super-majorities in both houses of the California legislature after this election. Let the taxing and spending begin!!![/quote]
No what happened last time we did that?
We got prop 13…
November 7, 2012 at 10:04 AM #753986
CoronitaParticipant[quote=no_such_reality][quote=XBoxBoy]You ain’t seen nothing yet. Democrats will have super-majorities in both houses of the California legislature after this election. Let the taxing and spending begin!!![/quote]
No what happened last time we did that?
We got prop 13…[/quote]
Yup, but wait. Some people think we should repeal that now…Well at least for investment property (obviously from people who don’t own investment property)…
November 7, 2012 at 10:08 AM #753990livinincali
Participant[quote=flu]
Yup, but wait. Some people think we should repeal that now…Well at least for investment property (obviously from people who don’t own investment property)…[/quote]Of course. It’s always ok tax and spend somebody else’s money. The problem with going down that path is eventually we come up with some tax and spend where “you” are the somebody else’s money.
November 7, 2012 at 10:34 AM #753997Oni Koroshi
ParticipantAside from the small sales tax increase, this won’t affect the income for most of us yet public education will benefit greatly which does affect all of us.
November 7, 2012 at 10:38 AM #753998
CoronitaParticipant[quote=Oni Koroshi]Aside from the small sales tax increase, this won’t affect the income for most of us yet public education will benefit greatly which does affect all of us.[/quote]
It won’t do shit for public education.
Bookmark this thread and let’s compare notes in 2 years to see if your local public school are any better off 2 years from now…
Local schools know this…And that’s probably why there’s a bunch of local bond initiatives to fund schools locally.
November 7, 2012 at 10:53 AM #754001XBoxBoy
Participant[quote=Oni Koroshi]public education will benefit greatly which does affect all of us.[/quote]
God it must be great to be young and idealistic still… Man I remember those days…
November 7, 2012 at 10:53 AM #754002ucodegen
Participant[quote=Oni Koroshi]Aside from the small sales tax increase, this won’t affect the income for most of us yet public education will benefit greatly which does affect all of us.[/quote]Problem is that throwing money at it does not mean you get quality. We have too many mixed agendas here.
November 7, 2012 at 11:04 AM #754006no_such_reality
Participant[quote=ucodegen][quote=Oni Koroshi]Aside from the small sales tax increase, this won’t affect the income for most of us yet public education will benefit greatly which does affect all of us.[/quote]Problem is that throwing money at it does not mean you get quality. We have too many mixed agendas here.[/quote]
No we don’t.
Most of the props and local measures all had one clear agenda. The trough is already lined up. It’s about the gravy, not the schools.
That billion dollar tax loophole, Prop 39? Yea, that’s about gravy too, it was bankrolled by the green energy hedgefund guy, and well, the tax revenue from it for the next two years are ear marked for ‘green energy’.
the death penalty prop, $100 million gravy for the police departments.
prop 30, gravy central…
November 7, 2012 at 11:11 AM #754011ucodegen
ParticipantWhat I find interesting is that last night, with only 29% of the vote count.. 30 was losing, 32 was winning, and 39 was losing. While we can declare who won the electoral college on 29% of the vote, the additional 71% of vote completely reversed the status on these propositions. Around 22:25, the secretary of state stopped updating their website. Either there is a very significantly different demographic that got added in, or something is hinky.
November 7, 2012 at 11:15 AM #754013meadandale
Participant[quote=flu][quote=Oni Koroshi]Aside from the small sales tax increase, this won’t affect the income for most of us yet public education will benefit greatly which does affect all of us.[/quote]
It won’t do shit for public education.
Bookmark this thread and let’s compare notes in 2 years to see if your local public school are any better off 2 years from now…
Local schools know this…And that’s probably why there’s a bunch of local bond initiatives to fund schools locally.[/quote]
What everyone fails to understand in their California Liberal Utopia fantasy is that although the prop 30 money may be “guaranteed” for schools, there is nothing preventing the state from shifting current education spending in the state budget to other things now that this measure passed.
Which will likely result in no net change or an actual decrease in education spending as this shift occurs.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
