- This topic has 103 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 8 months ago by svelte.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 7, 2012 at 10:56 AM #739466March 7, 2012 at 2:20 PM #739487NavydocParticipant
Wow, after reading these comments and a little research, I realize that the city/highway difference on the Prius isn’t as great as I believed. I thought it was the reverse of a gas or diesel powered car, but that is clearly not the case. Considering the current price difference between diesel and gasoline, the Prius makes more sense from a strictly economic sense.
Having driven both the Prius and the TDI I know I’d rather drive the TDI, but that’s a personal choice.
March 7, 2012 at 3:08 PM #739490ucodegenParticipantInterest Popular Mechanics article.. but one of the things I noticed, is that their driving techniques:
Since fuel economy is so dependent on driving style, we accelerated as smoothly and consistently as possible in both tests. Our general rule was to accelerate from each stop with just enough throttle to be as quick as the slowest car leaving the light. This, we believe, best approximates the driving style that an average consumer would adopt with fuel economy as a main priority.
actually worked against the Jetta TDI. With turbocharged vehicles, efficiency goes up with boost pressure. Boost effectively increases the compression ratio of the engine (by increasing working pressures). If you feather the pedal on the Jetta TDI, the turbo never spools up.
How about testing the BMW 335d… !!
Should add a mileage category for mountain driving .. up to Big Bear, Laguna.. those types of areas ;-P
March 7, 2012 at 3:37 PM #739495briansd1Guest[quote=Navydoc]Wow, after reading these comments and a little research, I realize that the city/highway difference on the Prius isn’t as great as I believed. [/quote]
I’m no mechanic engineer… but I read that it’s got something to do with it not taking much power to keep a small car moving on the highway.
The Prius is pretty aerodynamic as compared to another hybrid like the Ford Escape.
Turbocharged cars are a bad deal if you plan to keep them for a while. Turbos go bad and cost a lot of money to repair. The resale value ain’t great either.
March 7, 2012 at 4:23 PM #739501blahblahblahParticipant[quote=Navydoc]
Having driven both the Prius and the TDI I know I’d rather drive the TDI, but that’s a personal choice.[/quote]The Prius is not an exciting car to drive. I like the mileage but driving it is a little ho-hum. Actually really ho-hum, it just sort of floats along.
I like the TDI idea because the cars are usually cooler and more fun to drive. I really like the Audi TDI mini-SUV thingy but it costs a mint so no thanks. I am hoping that Mazda will put the new Sky-D turbo diesel in the Mazda 3 at some point, that would be a cool fun-to-drive car that gets pretty good mileage.
March 7, 2012 at 5:05 PM #739504ucodegenParticipant[quote=briansd1]Turbocharged cars are a bad deal if you plan to keep them for a while. Turbos go bad and cost a lot of money to repair. The resale value ain’t great either.[/quote]Having owned a 300zx turbo in my past, and putting almost 200,000 miles on it (not all gentle – had the ..ahem.. exercise the thing) I would have to disagree. It does depend upon the design of the turbo system, including the turbo. The Nissan 300ZX used a turbo with waterjacketed bearings. This makes a large difference to the life of the turbo. It prevents cooking of the turbo bearings. The other thing that helps is having an engine oil cooler – prevents breakdown of the oil, as well as good oil. In my case, I had belts, hoses, waterpumps, cracked exhaust manifold, clutch, brakes, and transmission second gear dog-clutch go out on me(or need major overhaul) first.
March 7, 2012 at 5:28 PM #739505sdrealtorParticipantMost turbocharged cars are not bought with an eye toward resale. Just sayin….
March 7, 2012 at 5:43 PM #739506RenParticipantIf my turbo goes before I trade, I’ll just use that as an excuse to get a bigger one.
March 7, 2012 at 6:31 PM #739508anParticipant[quote=Ren]If my turbo goes before I trade, I’ll just use that as an excuse to get a bigger one.[/quote]
Do you really need an excuse? πI can’t wait till more car maker jump on the turbo wagon. Next miata will have 1.3l turbo and weigh 2200lb. Sounds exciting to me.
March 8, 2012 at 12:50 AM #739532temeculaguyParticipantEmasculation on wheels, what’s next? Sitting down to pee?
March 8, 2012 at 6:25 AM #739536NavydocParticipant[quote=briansd1]Turbocharged cars are a bad deal if you plan to keep them for a while. Turbos go bad and cost a lot of money to repair. The resale value ain’t great either.[/quote]
Actually Brian, when you’re talking about durability in turbos, your’re likely referring to GAS turbo engines. The turbocharger was originally invented for diesel engines and the boost is typically far less than in a gas engine (not sure about the newest ones though). I used to have an ’89 Jetta turbodiesel and those things lasted FOREVER. Got about 40 mpg too. Was a great car, my dad put about 200,000 miles on it after I sold it to him and he never touched the car mechanically, aside from routine maintainance. Remember when you think about diesel durability, think about tractor trailers. Many are turbocharged.
By the way, a diesel without a turbocharger is nearly undrivable. My mother had a ’79 Audi 5000 non-turbo and it couldn’t get out of its own way. 69 galloping horsepower in a 2500 lb car.
March 8, 2012 at 6:35 AM #739538svelteParticipantlol TG! That’s classic!
The only car I can think of that leans more that way is the New Beetle. I was invited to a focus group about a year before it was released, back in 97 or so.
They didn’t tell us what we were going to be “focus”ing on, and I was stunned when I walked around the curtain dividers and saw a complete New Beetle sitting there in that green color that was unique at the time.
They had us walk around to different small rooms and review colors, options, I don’t remember what else. Then they walked us over to another room where we could sit in the car. I remember sitting there looking at the seats, the instruments. Then my eyes wandered right and right there, smack in the middle of the dash, was a flower vase with a single daisy. A flower vase. From the factory. On the dash.
Then they walked us over to another room where we filled out an online survey asking what we’d pay for the car. I basically said 0 as I wouldn’t be owning one.
If you look at the M/F purchase ratio for the New Beetle, very very few males buy it. I wonder why?
March 8, 2012 at 6:44 AM #739539CoronitaParticipant[quote=ucodegen]Interest Popular Mechanics article.. but one of the things I noticed, is that their driving techniques:
Since fuel economy is so dependent on driving style, we accelerated as smoothly and consistently as possible in both tests. Our general rule was to accelerate from each stop with just enough throttle to be as quick as the slowest car leaving the light. This, we believe, best approximates the driving style that an average consumer would adopt with fuel economy as a main priority.
actually worked against the Jetta TDI. With turbocharged vehicles, efficiency goes up with boost pressure. Boost effectively increases the compression ratio of the engine (by increasing working pressures). If you feather the pedal on the Jetta TDI, the turbo never spools up.
How about testing the BMW 335d… !!
Should add a mileage category for mountain driving .. up to Big Bear, Laguna.. those types of areas ;-P[/quote]
The 335d is nice. I had a loaner once with it…But screw the 335d or x5 35d…. What I need is the M550d
Nope, we won’t get it here in the states…
http://www.autoblog.com/2012/03/07/2012-bmw-m550d-xdrive-geneva-2012/
We grin because BMW has dropped a tri-turbo (yes, three turbochargers) 3.0-liter inline-six diesel engine under hood. With a lot of boost, the N57S engine is rated at 376 horsepower and an astounding 546 pound-feet of torque. Mated to an eight-speed automatic, the 5 Series will crack the 60-mile-per-hour benchmark in 4.7 seconds and run to an unrestricted 185 mph top speed (BMW electronically caps it at 155 mph). Permanent all-wheel drive, in the form of BMW’s xDrive, ensures the torque shreds all four tires equally. The surefooted driveline also makes the 37-mile-per-gallon oil-burning sedan the perfect all-weather friend.Why are we sobbing? As of today, BMW has no plans to offer this magnificent machine to the North American marketplace
March 8, 2012 at 8:10 AM #739550RenParticipant[quote=AN][quote=Ren]If my turbo goes before I trade, I’ll just use that as an excuse to get a bigger one.[/quote]
Do you really need an excuse? πI can’t wait till more car maker jump on the turbo wagon. Next miata will have 1.3l turbo and weigh 2200lb. Sounds exciting to me.[/quote]
Oh I’ve thought about it! I think there’s a complete kit for my car at around $1,700. The problem is, guys with big turbos on this platform have serious traction issues (as in standing on it in 5th at normal freeway speeds will just smoke the tires), and running bolt-ons/ethanol with the appropriate tune will make you nearly as fast anyway.
Nothing like a factory turbo. I’m bummed the “baby Boxster” was pushed out. A 2.5 liter turbo flat-4 (behind the seats, of course) in a 2,500-2,700lb car would have been legendary the moment it was released.
March 8, 2012 at 9:10 AM #739555anParticipant[quote=Ren]Oh I’ve thought about it! I think there’s a complete kit for my car at around $1,700. The problem is, guys with big turbos on this platform have serious traction issues (as in standing on it in 5th at normal freeway speeds will just smoke the tires), and running bolt-ons/ethanol with the appropriate tune will make you nearly as fast anyway.
Nothing like a factory turbo. I’m bummed the “baby Boxster” was pushed out. A 2.5 liter turbo flat-4 (behind the seats, of course) in a 2,500-2,700lb car would have been legendary the moment it was released.[/quote]
Do you mind saying what car you’re driving? $1700 sounds cheap for a complete kit. What’s included in the kit? I’m assume it has to be an I-4 inorder for a complete kit to be that cheap.WRT to traction, is it because your car is a FWD? If it’s RWD, traction can easily be solved by wider and stickier tires.
A baby Boxter would be freakin’ sweet. 2500lb and a 2.5L I-4 turbo would be my ideal weekend/track car. Now, if only BMW can slim down the M3 to be around 3000lb with a I-6 turbo from the 335i and I’d be a happy man.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.