Prime Areas Collapse – Page 8 – Piggington's Econo-Almanac

This topic has 175 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by SD Realtor.

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 176 total)

← 1 2 3 … 7 8 9 10 11 12 →

Author

Posts
October 13, 2009 at 12:09 PM #468958

sdcellar
Participant

I seem to recall it was just someone contending that the government was doing their best to keep things from detiorating further rather than an attempt to bring things back to bubble levels.

The latter would certainly seem much more difficult to achieve and suggestions that the recent rebound in the housing market represents any sustainable progress to that end would seem premature.

October 13, 2009 at 3:09 PM #468202

an
Participant

[quote=sdcellar]I seem to recall it was just someone contending that the government was doing their best to keep things from detiorating further rather than an attempt to bring things back to bubble levels.

The latter would certainly seem much more difficult to achieve and suggestions that the recent rebound in the housing market represents any sustainable progress to that end would seem premature.[/quote]
Not sure how good your memory is, but here’s what I said:
[quote=AN]I think the government will do whatever it takes to blow this bubble back up.[/quote]
blow this bubble back up = re-inflate. Is my dictionary broken?

October 13, 2009 at 3:09 PM #468386

an
Participant

[quote=sdcellar]I seem to recall it was just someone contending that the government was doing their best to keep things from detiorating further rather than an attempt to bring things back to bubble levels.

The latter would certainly seem much more difficult to achieve and suggestions that the recent rebound in the housing market represents any sustainable progress to that end would seem premature.[/quote]
Not sure how good your memory is, but here’s what I said:
[quote=AN]I think the government will do whatever it takes to blow this bubble back up.[/quote]
blow this bubble back up = re-inflate. Is my dictionary broken?

October 13, 2009 at 3:09 PM #468744

an
Participant

[quote=sdcellar]I seem to recall it was just someone contending that the government was doing their best to keep things from detiorating further rather than an attempt to bring things back to bubble levels.

The latter would certainly seem much more difficult to achieve and suggestions that the recent rebound in the housing market represents any sustainable progress to that end would seem premature.[/quote]
Not sure how good your memory is, but here’s what I said:
[quote=AN]I think the government will do whatever it takes to blow this bubble back up.[/quote]
blow this bubble back up = re-inflate. Is my dictionary broken?

October 13, 2009 at 3:09 PM #468816

an
Participant

[quote=sdcellar]I seem to recall it was just someone contending that the government was doing their best to keep things from detiorating further rather than an attempt to bring things back to bubble levels.

The latter would certainly seem much more difficult to achieve and suggestions that the recent rebound in the housing market represents any sustainable progress to that end would seem premature.[/quote]
Not sure how good your memory is, but here’s what I said:
[quote=AN]I think the government will do whatever it takes to blow this bubble back up.[/quote]
blow this bubble back up = re-inflate. Is my dictionary broken?

October 13, 2009 at 3:09 PM #469029

an
Participant

[quote=sdcellar]I seem to recall it was just someone contending that the government was doing their best to keep things from detiorating further rather than an attempt to bring things back to bubble levels.

The latter would certainly seem much more difficult to achieve and suggestions that the recent rebound in the housing market represents any sustainable progress to that end would seem premature.[/quote]
Not sure how good your memory is, but here’s what I said:
[quote=AN]I think the government will do whatever it takes to blow this bubble back up.[/quote]
blow this bubble back up = re-inflate. Is my dictionary broken?

October 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM #468217

sdcellar
Participant

So, just to be clear, you’re asserting that the government is trying to get us back to 2005/2006 pricing levels?

October 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM #468401

sdcellar
Participant

So, just to be clear, you’re asserting that the government is trying to get us back to 2005/2006 pricing levels?

October 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM #468759

sdcellar
Participant

So, just to be clear, you’re asserting that the government is trying to get us back to 2005/2006 pricing levels?

October 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM #468831

sdcellar
Participant

So, just to be clear, you’re asserting that the government is trying to get us back to 2005/2006 pricing levels?

October 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM #469044

sdcellar
Participant

So, just to be clear, you’re asserting that the government is trying to get us back to 2005/2006 pricing levels?

October 13, 2009 at 3:50 PM #468237

an
Participant

[quote=sdcellar]So, just to be clear, you’re asserting that the government is trying to get us back to 2005/2006 pricing levels?[/quote]
Isn’t that what re-inflate mean?

October 13, 2009 at 3:50 PM #468421

an
Participant

[quote=sdcellar]So, just to be clear, you’re asserting that the government is trying to get us back to 2005/2006 pricing levels?[/quote]
Isn’t that what re-inflate mean?

October 13, 2009 at 3:50 PM #468779

an
Participant

[quote=sdcellar]So, just to be clear, you’re asserting that the government is trying to get us back to 2005/2006 pricing levels?[/quote]
Isn’t that what re-inflate mean?

October 13, 2009 at 3:50 PM #468851

an
Participant

[quote=sdcellar]So, just to be clear, you’re asserting that the government is trying to get us back to 2005/2006 pricing levels?[/quote]
Isn’t that what re-inflate mean?
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 176 total)

← 1 2 3 … 7 8 9 10 11 12 →

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.