- This topic has 75 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by
SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 23, 2009 at 12:09 AM #461269September 23, 2009 at 12:37 AM #460466
SD Realtor
ParticipantJP why is Albatross suspicious. Looks like a standard flip to me. It is late and I havent done much research so I must be missing something.
September 23, 2009 at 12:37 AM #460658SD Realtor
ParticipantJP why is Albatross suspicious. Looks like a standard flip to me. It is late and I havent done much research so I must be missing something.
September 23, 2009 at 12:37 AM #460999SD Realtor
ParticipantJP why is Albatross suspicious. Looks like a standard flip to me. It is late and I havent done much research so I must be missing something.
September 23, 2009 at 12:37 AM #461072SD Realtor
ParticipantJP why is Albatross suspicious. Looks like a standard flip to me. It is late and I havent done much research so I must be missing something.
September 23, 2009 at 12:37 AM #461274SD Realtor
ParticipantJP why is Albatross suspicious. Looks like a standard flip to me. It is late and I havent done much research so I must be missing something.
September 23, 2009 at 6:52 AM #460476jpinpb
ParticipantI haven’t done the research either. Just reading the comments on it, someone offered 120k more than it sold for. punstress commented that the people that bought it were the realtors that had the listing the first time around and the same realtors that are selling now. On the surface, does seem like an inside deal, but SDR, you’re right, I shouldn’t assume anything w/out doing the research and verifying the info.
September 23, 2009 at 6:52 AM #460668jpinpb
ParticipantI haven’t done the research either. Just reading the comments on it, someone offered 120k more than it sold for. punstress commented that the people that bought it were the realtors that had the listing the first time around and the same realtors that are selling now. On the surface, does seem like an inside deal, but SDR, you’re right, I shouldn’t assume anything w/out doing the research and verifying the info.
September 23, 2009 at 6:52 AM #461009jpinpb
ParticipantI haven’t done the research either. Just reading the comments on it, someone offered 120k more than it sold for. punstress commented that the people that bought it were the realtors that had the listing the first time around and the same realtors that are selling now. On the surface, does seem like an inside deal, but SDR, you’re right, I shouldn’t assume anything w/out doing the research and verifying the info.
September 23, 2009 at 6:52 AM #461082jpinpb
ParticipantI haven’t done the research either. Just reading the comments on it, someone offered 120k more than it sold for. punstress commented that the people that bought it were the realtors that had the listing the first time around and the same realtors that are selling now. On the surface, does seem like an inside deal, but SDR, you’re right, I shouldn’t assume anything w/out doing the research and verifying the info.
September 23, 2009 at 6:52 AM #461284jpinpb
ParticipantI haven’t done the research either. Just reading the comments on it, someone offered 120k more than it sold for. punstress commented that the people that bought it were the realtors that had the listing the first time around and the same realtors that are selling now. On the surface, does seem like an inside deal, but SDR, you’re right, I shouldn’t assume anything w/out doing the research and verifying the info.
September 23, 2009 at 8:16 AM #460491SD Realtor
ParticipantI understand. So here is the reality at least as I see it.
The home was purchased back in 06 for 575k. Then it went to trustee sale in 6/08 and went back to the bene at 507k. Then it was placed on the MLS at 339k and purchased for 330k cash. Now it is on the MLS at 589k. All of the previous listings show 822 sf but this new listing shows 1140 sf. The tax roll still shows 822 sf though.
As I said I do not know if anything fishy happened and maybe Punstress knows something I do not.
So theoretically if I just purchased a home at resold it for say 100k more then I bought it for does that mean it was an inside job?
There could be a link between the company that sold it for 330k Neven Spraljia of Real Solutions and Haris Economus of Metro Solutions. I don’t know.
Anyways again, maybe I am missing something here.
September 23, 2009 at 8:16 AM #460683SD Realtor
ParticipantI understand. So here is the reality at least as I see it.
The home was purchased back in 06 for 575k. Then it went to trustee sale in 6/08 and went back to the bene at 507k. Then it was placed on the MLS at 339k and purchased for 330k cash. Now it is on the MLS at 589k. All of the previous listings show 822 sf but this new listing shows 1140 sf. The tax roll still shows 822 sf though.
As I said I do not know if anything fishy happened and maybe Punstress knows something I do not.
So theoretically if I just purchased a home at resold it for say 100k more then I bought it for does that mean it was an inside job?
There could be a link between the company that sold it for 330k Neven Spraljia of Real Solutions and Haris Economus of Metro Solutions. I don’t know.
Anyways again, maybe I am missing something here.
September 23, 2009 at 8:16 AM #461024SD Realtor
ParticipantI understand. So here is the reality at least as I see it.
The home was purchased back in 06 for 575k. Then it went to trustee sale in 6/08 and went back to the bene at 507k. Then it was placed on the MLS at 339k and purchased for 330k cash. Now it is on the MLS at 589k. All of the previous listings show 822 sf but this new listing shows 1140 sf. The tax roll still shows 822 sf though.
As I said I do not know if anything fishy happened and maybe Punstress knows something I do not.
So theoretically if I just purchased a home at resold it for say 100k more then I bought it for does that mean it was an inside job?
There could be a link between the company that sold it for 330k Neven Spraljia of Real Solutions and Haris Economus of Metro Solutions. I don’t know.
Anyways again, maybe I am missing something here.
September 23, 2009 at 8:16 AM #461097SD Realtor
ParticipantI understand. So here is the reality at least as I see it.
The home was purchased back in 06 for 575k. Then it went to trustee sale in 6/08 and went back to the bene at 507k. Then it was placed on the MLS at 339k and purchased for 330k cash. Now it is on the MLS at 589k. All of the previous listings show 822 sf but this new listing shows 1140 sf. The tax roll still shows 822 sf though.
As I said I do not know if anything fishy happened and maybe Punstress knows something I do not.
So theoretically if I just purchased a home at resold it for say 100k more then I bought it for does that mean it was an inside job?
There could be a link between the company that sold it for 330k Neven Spraljia of Real Solutions and Haris Economus of Metro Solutions. I don’t know.
Anyways again, maybe I am missing something here.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
