- This topic has 75 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 23, 2009 at 12:09 AM #461269September 23, 2009 at 12:37 AM #460999SD RealtorParticipant
JP why is Albatross suspicious. Looks like a standard flip to me. It is late and I havent done much research so I must be missing something.
September 23, 2009 at 12:37 AM #461072SD RealtorParticipantJP why is Albatross suspicious. Looks like a standard flip to me. It is late and I havent done much research so I must be missing something.
September 23, 2009 at 12:37 AM #461274SD RealtorParticipantJP why is Albatross suspicious. Looks like a standard flip to me. It is late and I havent done much research so I must be missing something.
September 23, 2009 at 12:37 AM #460466SD RealtorParticipantJP why is Albatross suspicious. Looks like a standard flip to me. It is late and I havent done much research so I must be missing something.
September 23, 2009 at 12:37 AM #460658SD RealtorParticipantJP why is Albatross suspicious. Looks like a standard flip to me. It is late and I havent done much research so I must be missing something.
September 23, 2009 at 6:52 AM #461082jpinpbParticipantI haven’t done the research either. Just reading the comments on it, someone offered 120k more than it sold for. punstress commented that the people that bought it were the realtors that had the listing the first time around and the same realtors that are selling now. On the surface, does seem like an inside deal, but SDR, you’re right, I shouldn’t assume anything w/out doing the research and verifying the info.
September 23, 2009 at 6:52 AM #461009jpinpbParticipantI haven’t done the research either. Just reading the comments on it, someone offered 120k more than it sold for. punstress commented that the people that bought it were the realtors that had the listing the first time around and the same realtors that are selling now. On the surface, does seem like an inside deal, but SDR, you’re right, I shouldn’t assume anything w/out doing the research and verifying the info.
September 23, 2009 at 6:52 AM #460476jpinpbParticipantI haven’t done the research either. Just reading the comments on it, someone offered 120k more than it sold for. punstress commented that the people that bought it were the realtors that had the listing the first time around and the same realtors that are selling now. On the surface, does seem like an inside deal, but SDR, you’re right, I shouldn’t assume anything w/out doing the research and verifying the info.
September 23, 2009 at 6:52 AM #461284jpinpbParticipantI haven’t done the research either. Just reading the comments on it, someone offered 120k more than it sold for. punstress commented that the people that bought it were the realtors that had the listing the first time around and the same realtors that are selling now. On the surface, does seem like an inside deal, but SDR, you’re right, I shouldn’t assume anything w/out doing the research and verifying the info.
September 23, 2009 at 6:52 AM #460668jpinpbParticipantI haven’t done the research either. Just reading the comments on it, someone offered 120k more than it sold for. punstress commented that the people that bought it were the realtors that had the listing the first time around and the same realtors that are selling now. On the surface, does seem like an inside deal, but SDR, you’re right, I shouldn’t assume anything w/out doing the research and verifying the info.
September 23, 2009 at 8:16 AM #461299SD RealtorParticipantI understand. So here is the reality at least as I see it.
The home was purchased back in 06 for 575k. Then it went to trustee sale in 6/08 and went back to the bene at 507k. Then it was placed on the MLS at 339k and purchased for 330k cash. Now it is on the MLS at 589k. All of the previous listings show 822 sf but this new listing shows 1140 sf. The tax roll still shows 822 sf though.
As I said I do not know if anything fishy happened and maybe Punstress knows something I do not.
So theoretically if I just purchased a home at resold it for say 100k more then I bought it for does that mean it was an inside job?
There could be a link between the company that sold it for 330k Neven Spraljia of Real Solutions and Haris Economus of Metro Solutions. I don’t know.
Anyways again, maybe I am missing something here.
September 23, 2009 at 8:16 AM #461097SD RealtorParticipantI understand. So here is the reality at least as I see it.
The home was purchased back in 06 for 575k. Then it went to trustee sale in 6/08 and went back to the bene at 507k. Then it was placed on the MLS at 339k and purchased for 330k cash. Now it is on the MLS at 589k. All of the previous listings show 822 sf but this new listing shows 1140 sf. The tax roll still shows 822 sf though.
As I said I do not know if anything fishy happened and maybe Punstress knows something I do not.
So theoretically if I just purchased a home at resold it for say 100k more then I bought it for does that mean it was an inside job?
There could be a link between the company that sold it for 330k Neven Spraljia of Real Solutions and Haris Economus of Metro Solutions. I don’t know.
Anyways again, maybe I am missing something here.
September 23, 2009 at 8:16 AM #461024SD RealtorParticipantI understand. So here is the reality at least as I see it.
The home was purchased back in 06 for 575k. Then it went to trustee sale in 6/08 and went back to the bene at 507k. Then it was placed on the MLS at 339k and purchased for 330k cash. Now it is on the MLS at 589k. All of the previous listings show 822 sf but this new listing shows 1140 sf. The tax roll still shows 822 sf though.
As I said I do not know if anything fishy happened and maybe Punstress knows something I do not.
So theoretically if I just purchased a home at resold it for say 100k more then I bought it for does that mean it was an inside job?
There could be a link between the company that sold it for 330k Neven Spraljia of Real Solutions and Haris Economus of Metro Solutions. I don’t know.
Anyways again, maybe I am missing something here.
September 23, 2009 at 8:16 AM #460491SD RealtorParticipantI understand. So here is the reality at least as I see it.
The home was purchased back in 06 for 575k. Then it went to trustee sale in 6/08 and went back to the bene at 507k. Then it was placed on the MLS at 339k and purchased for 330k cash. Now it is on the MLS at 589k. All of the previous listings show 822 sf but this new listing shows 1140 sf. The tax roll still shows 822 sf though.
As I said I do not know if anything fishy happened and maybe Punstress knows something I do not.
So theoretically if I just purchased a home at resold it for say 100k more then I bought it for does that mean it was an inside job?
There could be a link between the company that sold it for 330k Neven Spraljia of Real Solutions and Haris Economus of Metro Solutions. I don’t know.
Anyways again, maybe I am missing something here.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.