- This topic has 75 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by
SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 22, 2009 at 11:08 PM #461234September 22, 2009 at 11:09 PM #460431
scaredyclassic
Participantyeah, crime doesn’t pay.
September 22, 2009 at 11:09 PM #460623scaredyclassic
Participantyeah, crime doesn’t pay.
September 22, 2009 at 11:09 PM #460964scaredyclassic
Participantyeah, crime doesn’t pay.
September 22, 2009 at 11:09 PM #461037scaredyclassic
Participantyeah, crime doesn’t pay.
September 22, 2009 at 11:09 PM #461239scaredyclassic
Participantyeah, crime doesn’t pay.
September 22, 2009 at 11:09 PM #460436scaredyclassic
Participantparticularly while the Dark Knight is on the prowl.
September 22, 2009 at 11:09 PM #460628scaredyclassic
Participantparticularly while the Dark Knight is on the prowl.
September 22, 2009 at 11:09 PM #460969scaredyclassic
Participantparticularly while the Dark Knight is on the prowl.
September 22, 2009 at 11:09 PM #461042scaredyclassic
Participantparticularly while the Dark Knight is on the prowl.
September 22, 2009 at 11:09 PM #461244scaredyclassic
Participantparticularly while the Dark Knight is on the prowl.
September 23, 2009 at 12:09 AM #460461SD Realtor
ParticipantI would agree with what sdr said. I do believe that more often then not the majority of transactions are not fraudulent. I also believe that yes there are problems with agents giving preferential treatment to double-ending deals, or to other agents in thier office. That sucks but unless a major systemic change is made, which will not happen, it is what it is. Still though it is irritating.
September 23, 2009 at 12:09 AM #460653SD Realtor
ParticipantI would agree with what sdr said. I do believe that more often then not the majority of transactions are not fraudulent. I also believe that yes there are problems with agents giving preferential treatment to double-ending deals, or to other agents in thier office. That sucks but unless a major systemic change is made, which will not happen, it is what it is. Still though it is irritating.
September 23, 2009 at 12:09 AM #460994SD Realtor
ParticipantI would agree with what sdr said. I do believe that more often then not the majority of transactions are not fraudulent. I also believe that yes there are problems with agents giving preferential treatment to double-ending deals, or to other agents in thier office. That sucks but unless a major systemic change is made, which will not happen, it is what it is. Still though it is irritating.
September 23, 2009 at 12:09 AM #461067SD Realtor
ParticipantI would agree with what sdr said. I do believe that more often then not the majority of transactions are not fraudulent. I also believe that yes there are problems with agents giving preferential treatment to double-ending deals, or to other agents in thier office. That sucks but unless a major systemic change is made, which will not happen, it is what it is. Still though it is irritating.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
