- This topic has 330 replies, 39 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by
LAAFTERHOURS.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 9, 2009 at 10:29 PM #413725June 10, 2009 at 7:40 AM #413072
Ren
Participant[quote=Eugene]Affordability was at a 10-year high this February and March.
[/quote]For the county as a whole, maybe. Again, it depends on the area. Homes on the coast are not affordable by any stretch of the imagination, and their prices do not in any way compare to the affordability of coastal homes 10 years ago.
June 10, 2009 at 7:40 AM #413308Ren
Participant[quote=Eugene]Affordability was at a 10-year high this February and March.
[/quote]For the county as a whole, maybe. Again, it depends on the area. Homes on the coast are not affordable by any stretch of the imagination, and their prices do not in any way compare to the affordability of coastal homes 10 years ago.
June 10, 2009 at 7:40 AM #413550Ren
Participant[quote=Eugene]Affordability was at a 10-year high this February and March.
[/quote]For the county as a whole, maybe. Again, it depends on the area. Homes on the coast are not affordable by any stretch of the imagination, and their prices do not in any way compare to the affordability of coastal homes 10 years ago.
June 10, 2009 at 7:40 AM #413618Ren
Participant[quote=Eugene]Affordability was at a 10-year high this February and March.
[/quote]For the county as a whole, maybe. Again, it depends on the area. Homes on the coast are not affordable by any stretch of the imagination, and their prices do not in any way compare to the affordability of coastal homes 10 years ago.
June 10, 2009 at 7:40 AM #413770Ren
Participant[quote=Eugene]Affordability was at a 10-year high this February and March.
[/quote]For the county as a whole, maybe. Again, it depends on the area. Homes on the coast are not affordable by any stretch of the imagination, and their prices do not in any way compare to the affordability of coastal homes 10 years ago.
June 10, 2009 at 8:38 AM #413081carlsbadworker
ParticipantForgive me to say this, but this isn’t the best place to ask this kind of question. Piggington is known for its analytical and data mining skills, it has no skills in sorcery and witchcraft that can be applied to perfect market timing. By asking this kind of question, you are feeding the delusional ego of some posters here who think they can perfectly time the market.
Although James Surowiecki did show that there is a thing called the wisdom of the crowd, but this community is constantly exposed to the same set of the data that it is undoubtably biased because of such kind of exposure.
I myself am biased on the upside because I don’t have many friends that got laid off and my salary is 80% higher than it was in 2001 so I will certainly consider Temecula’s 2001 price a steal, but that is not necessarily true for others. Some pessimists maybe are waiting for price in the 80s. In an independent crowd, you can even out such bias impacts and get a better estimate. But I just don’t think piggington is the place, although it is very knowledgable about real estate.June 10, 2009 at 8:38 AM #413318carlsbadworker
ParticipantForgive me to say this, but this isn’t the best place to ask this kind of question. Piggington is known for its analytical and data mining skills, it has no skills in sorcery and witchcraft that can be applied to perfect market timing. By asking this kind of question, you are feeding the delusional ego of some posters here who think they can perfectly time the market.
Although James Surowiecki did show that there is a thing called the wisdom of the crowd, but this community is constantly exposed to the same set of the data that it is undoubtably biased because of such kind of exposure.
I myself am biased on the upside because I don’t have many friends that got laid off and my salary is 80% higher than it was in 2001 so I will certainly consider Temecula’s 2001 price a steal, but that is not necessarily true for others. Some pessimists maybe are waiting for price in the 80s. In an independent crowd, you can even out such bias impacts and get a better estimate. But I just don’t think piggington is the place, although it is very knowledgable about real estate.June 10, 2009 at 8:38 AM #413560carlsbadworker
ParticipantForgive me to say this, but this isn’t the best place to ask this kind of question. Piggington is known for its analytical and data mining skills, it has no skills in sorcery and witchcraft that can be applied to perfect market timing. By asking this kind of question, you are feeding the delusional ego of some posters here who think they can perfectly time the market.
Although James Surowiecki did show that there is a thing called the wisdom of the crowd, but this community is constantly exposed to the same set of the data that it is undoubtably biased because of such kind of exposure.
I myself am biased on the upside because I don’t have many friends that got laid off and my salary is 80% higher than it was in 2001 so I will certainly consider Temecula’s 2001 price a steal, but that is not necessarily true for others. Some pessimists maybe are waiting for price in the 80s. In an independent crowd, you can even out such bias impacts and get a better estimate. But I just don’t think piggington is the place, although it is very knowledgable about real estate.June 10, 2009 at 8:38 AM #413628carlsbadworker
ParticipantForgive me to say this, but this isn’t the best place to ask this kind of question. Piggington is known for its analytical and data mining skills, it has no skills in sorcery and witchcraft that can be applied to perfect market timing. By asking this kind of question, you are feeding the delusional ego of some posters here who think they can perfectly time the market.
Although James Surowiecki did show that there is a thing called the wisdom of the crowd, but this community is constantly exposed to the same set of the data that it is undoubtably biased because of such kind of exposure.
I myself am biased on the upside because I don’t have many friends that got laid off and my salary is 80% higher than it was in 2001 so I will certainly consider Temecula’s 2001 price a steal, but that is not necessarily true for others. Some pessimists maybe are waiting for price in the 80s. In an independent crowd, you can even out such bias impacts and get a better estimate. But I just don’t think piggington is the place, although it is very knowledgable about real estate.June 10, 2009 at 8:38 AM #413780carlsbadworker
ParticipantForgive me to say this, but this isn’t the best place to ask this kind of question. Piggington is known for its analytical and data mining skills, it has no skills in sorcery and witchcraft that can be applied to perfect market timing. By asking this kind of question, you are feeding the delusional ego of some posters here who think they can perfectly time the market.
Although James Surowiecki did show that there is a thing called the wisdom of the crowd, but this community is constantly exposed to the same set of the data that it is undoubtably biased because of such kind of exposure.
I myself am biased on the upside because I don’t have many friends that got laid off and my salary is 80% higher than it was in 2001 so I will certainly consider Temecula’s 2001 price a steal, but that is not necessarily true for others. Some pessimists maybe are waiting for price in the 80s. In an independent crowd, you can even out such bias impacts and get a better estimate. But I just don’t think piggington is the place, although it is very knowledgable about real estate.June 10, 2009 at 9:15 AM #413101Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participant[quote=carlsbadworker]Forgive me to say this, but this isn’t the best place to ask this kind of question. Piggington is known for its analytical and data mining skills, it has no skills in sorcery and witchcraft that can be applied to perfect market timing. By asking this kind of question, you are feeding the delusional ego of some posters here who think they can perfectly time the market.
Although James Surowiecki did show that there is a thing called the wisdom of the crowd, but this community is constantly exposed to the same set of the data that it is undoubtably biased because of such kind of exposure.
I myself am biased on the upside because I don’t have many friends that got laid off and my salary is 80% higher than it was in 2001 so I will certainly consider Temecula’s 2001 price a steal, but that is not necessarily true for others. Some pessimists maybe are waiting for price in the 80s. In an independent crowd, you can even out such bias impacts and get a better estimate. But I just don’t think piggington is the place, although it is very knowledgable about real estate.[/quote]I am only making maybe 20% more than 2001, but I too consider Temecula’s 2001 price a steal.
Better yet for some of the older smaller homes the somewhere in the mid 1990’s price is what I would consider a steal or maybe the deal of a life time (one that only comes once in a life time if you know what I mean).
But these are just my opinions of course.
Due your own DD .
June 10, 2009 at 9:15 AM #413336Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participant[quote=carlsbadworker]Forgive me to say this, but this isn’t the best place to ask this kind of question. Piggington is known for its analytical and data mining skills, it has no skills in sorcery and witchcraft that can be applied to perfect market timing. By asking this kind of question, you are feeding the delusional ego of some posters here who think they can perfectly time the market.
Although James Surowiecki did show that there is a thing called the wisdom of the crowd, but this community is constantly exposed to the same set of the data that it is undoubtably biased because of such kind of exposure.
I myself am biased on the upside because I don’t have many friends that got laid off and my salary is 80% higher than it was in 2001 so I will certainly consider Temecula’s 2001 price a steal, but that is not necessarily true for others. Some pessimists maybe are waiting for price in the 80s. In an independent crowd, you can even out such bias impacts and get a better estimate. But I just don’t think piggington is the place, although it is very knowledgable about real estate.[/quote]I am only making maybe 20% more than 2001, but I too consider Temecula’s 2001 price a steal.
Better yet for some of the older smaller homes the somewhere in the mid 1990’s price is what I would consider a steal or maybe the deal of a life time (one that only comes once in a life time if you know what I mean).
But these are just my opinions of course.
Due your own DD .
June 10, 2009 at 9:15 AM #413580Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participant[quote=carlsbadworker]Forgive me to say this, but this isn’t the best place to ask this kind of question. Piggington is known for its analytical and data mining skills, it has no skills in sorcery and witchcraft that can be applied to perfect market timing. By asking this kind of question, you are feeding the delusional ego of some posters here who think they can perfectly time the market.
Although James Surowiecki did show that there is a thing called the wisdom of the crowd, but this community is constantly exposed to the same set of the data that it is undoubtably biased because of such kind of exposure.
I myself am biased on the upside because I don’t have many friends that got laid off and my salary is 80% higher than it was in 2001 so I will certainly consider Temecula’s 2001 price a steal, but that is not necessarily true for others. Some pessimists maybe are waiting for price in the 80s. In an independent crowd, you can even out such bias impacts and get a better estimate. But I just don’t think piggington is the place, although it is very knowledgable about real estate.[/quote]I am only making maybe 20% more than 2001, but I too consider Temecula’s 2001 price a steal.
Better yet for some of the older smaller homes the somewhere in the mid 1990’s price is what I would consider a steal or maybe the deal of a life time (one that only comes once in a life time if you know what I mean).
But these are just my opinions of course.
Due your own DD .
June 10, 2009 at 9:15 AM #413648Nor-LA-SD-guy
Participant[quote=carlsbadworker]Forgive me to say this, but this isn’t the best place to ask this kind of question. Piggington is known for its analytical and data mining skills, it has no skills in sorcery and witchcraft that can be applied to perfect market timing. By asking this kind of question, you are feeding the delusional ego of some posters here who think they can perfectly time the market.
Although James Surowiecki did show that there is a thing called the wisdom of the crowd, but this community is constantly exposed to the same set of the data that it is undoubtably biased because of such kind of exposure.
I myself am biased on the upside because I don’t have many friends that got laid off and my salary is 80% higher than it was in 2001 so I will certainly consider Temecula’s 2001 price a steal, but that is not necessarily true for others. Some pessimists maybe are waiting for price in the 80s. In an independent crowd, you can even out such bias impacts and get a better estimate. But I just don’t think piggington is the place, although it is very knowledgable about real estate.[/quote]I am only making maybe 20% more than 2001, but I too consider Temecula’s 2001 price a steal.
Better yet for some of the older smaller homes the somewhere in the mid 1990’s price is what I would consider a steal or maybe the deal of a life time (one that only comes once in a life time if you know what I mean).
But these are just my opinions of course.
Due your own DD .
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.