- This topic has 55 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by
Jazzman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 14, 2011 at 7:50 AM #703913June 14, 2011 at 9:31 AM #703343
urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=Jazzman]The issues is not ‘pending’, but ‘pending do NOT continue to show’, which apparently removes the listing, sometimes prematurely, thereby not allowing back up offers. Is there a record of this happening that other brokers can see?[/quote]
Typically, the free sites have somewhat limited access to listings other than active and sold (they are not the actual MLS).
Sometimes properties are intentionally blocked from public sites (at the suggestion of sellers, tenants, or agents) even though it is on the MLS.
However usually, if a property is invisible, it is because it is withdrawn.
That blocks it from virtually everybody.
Withdrawn is a status that means there is an active listing agreement but some body (agent, seller, tenant) does not want it shown as active on the MLS.
Very common in rental properties.
Not very common in shorts (as far as I have seen).It is possible that it is fraudulent (in the real meaning, not CAR’s crazy person version) but your description does not give enough information to glean that.
Post the address and I could tell you more definitively.
June 14, 2011 at 9:31 AM #704442Participant[quote=Jazzman]The issues is not ‘pending’, but ‘pending do NOT continue to show’, which apparently removes the listing, sometimes prematurely, thereby not allowing back up offers. Is there a record of this happening that other brokers can see?[/quote]
Typically, the free sites have somewhat limited access to listings other than active and sold (they are not the actual MLS).
Sometimes properties are intentionally blocked from public sites (at the suggestion of sellers, tenants, or agents) even though it is on the MLS.
However usually, if a property is invisible, it is because it is withdrawn.
That blocks it from virtually everybody.
Withdrawn is a status that means there is an active listing agreement but some body (agent, seller, tenant) does not want it shown as active on the MLS.
Very common in rental properties.
Not very common in shorts (as far as I have seen).It is possible that it is fraudulent (in the real meaning, not CAR’s crazy person version) but your description does not give enough information to glean that.
Post the address and I could tell you more definitively.
June 14, 2011 at 9:31 AM #704082Participant[quote=Jazzman]The issues is not ‘pending’, but ‘pending do NOT continue to show’, which apparently removes the listing, sometimes prematurely, thereby not allowing back up offers. Is there a record of this happening that other brokers can see?[/quote]
Typically, the free sites have somewhat limited access to listings other than active and sold (they are not the actual MLS).
Sometimes properties are intentionally blocked from public sites (at the suggestion of sellers, tenants, or agents) even though it is on the MLS.
However usually, if a property is invisible, it is because it is withdrawn.
That blocks it from virtually everybody.
Withdrawn is a status that means there is an active listing agreement but some body (agent, seller, tenant) does not want it shown as active on the MLS.
Very common in rental properties.
Not very common in shorts (as far as I have seen).It is possible that it is fraudulent (in the real meaning, not CAR’s crazy person version) but your description does not give enough information to glean that.
Post the address and I could tell you more definitively.
June 14, 2011 at 9:31 AM #703246Participant[quote=Jazzman]The issues is not ‘pending’, but ‘pending do NOT continue to show’, which apparently removes the listing, sometimes prematurely, thereby not allowing back up offers. Is there a record of this happening that other brokers can see?[/quote]
Typically, the free sites have somewhat limited access to listings other than active and sold (they are not the actual MLS).
Sometimes properties are intentionally blocked from public sites (at the suggestion of sellers, tenants, or agents) even though it is on the MLS.
However usually, if a property is invisible, it is because it is withdrawn.
That blocks it from virtually everybody.
Withdrawn is a status that means there is an active listing agreement but some body (agent, seller, tenant) does not want it shown as active on the MLS.
Very common in rental properties.
Not very common in shorts (as far as I have seen).It is possible that it is fraudulent (in the real meaning, not CAR’s crazy person version) but your description does not give enough information to glean that.
Post the address and I could tell you more definitively.
June 14, 2011 at 9:31 AM #703933Participant[quote=Jazzman]The issues is not ‘pending’, but ‘pending do NOT continue to show’, which apparently removes the listing, sometimes prematurely, thereby not allowing back up offers. Is there a record of this happening that other brokers can see?[/quote]
Typically, the free sites have somewhat limited access to listings other than active and sold (they are not the actual MLS).
Sometimes properties are intentionally blocked from public sites (at the suggestion of sellers, tenants, or agents) even though it is on the MLS.
However usually, if a property is invisible, it is because it is withdrawn.
That blocks it from virtually everybody.
Withdrawn is a status that means there is an active listing agreement but some body (agent, seller, tenant) does not want it shown as active on the MLS.
Very common in rental properties.
Not very common in shorts (as far as I have seen).It is possible that it is fraudulent (in the real meaning, not CAR’s crazy person version) but your description does not give enough information to glean that.
Post the address and I could tell you more definitively.
June 14, 2011 at 10:43 AM #703958Jazzman
ParticipantUR, thanks. The property is not in CA. That may make a difference. Am happy to post the listing if can comment. BTW, this hasn’t been happening on free sites, but brokers’ sites that have MLS feeds.
June 14, 2011 at 10:43 AM #704107ParticipantUR, thanks. The property is not in CA. That may make a difference. Am happy to post the listing if can comment. BTW, this hasn’t been happening on free sites, but brokers’ sites that have MLS feeds.
June 14, 2011 at 10:43 AM #704466ParticipantUR, thanks. The property is not in CA. That may make a difference. Am happy to post the listing if can comment. BTW, this hasn’t been happening on free sites, but brokers’ sites that have MLS feeds.
June 14, 2011 at 10:43 AM #703271ParticipantUR, thanks. The property is not in CA. That may make a difference. Am happy to post the listing if can comment. BTW, this hasn’t been happening on free sites, but brokers’ sites that have MLS feeds.
June 14, 2011 at 10:43 AM #703368ParticipantUR, thanks. The property is not in CA. That may make a difference. Am happy to post the listing if can comment. BTW, this hasn’t been happening on free sites, but brokers’ sites that have MLS feeds.
June 14, 2011 at 11:34 AM #704491sdrealtor
ParticipantLaws out of CA might be different but that wouldnt be wrong or unusual here. Once your house is in escrow most people dont want to be bothered with showings if they think they have a good solid buyer.
June 14, 2011 at 11:34 AM #703296ParticipantLaws out of CA might be different but that wouldnt be wrong or unusual here. Once your house is in escrow most people dont want to be bothered with showings if they think they have a good solid buyer.
June 14, 2011 at 11:34 AM #703983ParticipantLaws out of CA might be different but that wouldnt be wrong or unusual here. Once your house is in escrow most people dont want to be bothered with showings if they think they have a good solid buyer.
June 14, 2011 at 11:34 AM #703392ParticipantLaws out of CA might be different but that wouldnt be wrong or unusual here. Once your house is in escrow most people dont want to be bothered with showings if they think they have a good solid buyer.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.