Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Paying Attention?
- This topic has 315 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 6 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 3, 2011 at 2:56 PM #715931August 3, 2011 at 3:55 PM #714727
danielwis
ParticipantI started to short gold this week. I know I’m a little early but have time to sit and wait.
August 3, 2011 at 3:55 PM #714818danielwis
ParticipantI started to short gold this week. I know I’m a little early but have time to sit and wait.
August 3, 2011 at 3:55 PM #715421danielwis
ParticipantI started to short gold this week. I know I’m a little early but have time to sit and wait.
August 3, 2011 at 3:55 PM #715575danielwis
ParticipantI started to short gold this week. I know I’m a little early but have time to sit and wait.
August 3, 2011 at 3:55 PM #715936danielwis
ParticipantI started to short gold this week. I know I’m a little early but have time to sit and wait.
August 3, 2011 at 4:01 PM #714737briansd1
Guest[quote=evolusd]I believe the only reason we had a ‘recovery’ over the last 28-24 months is due to massive government spending/stimulus funded by an amazing increase in our national debt.
[/quote]For a perspective, the $800 billion stimulus, about $300 billion of which was tax cuts, just about equals the amounts of cuts at the state and local levels.
August 3, 2011 at 4:01 PM #714828briansd1
Guest[quote=evolusd]I believe the only reason we had a ‘recovery’ over the last 28-24 months is due to massive government spending/stimulus funded by an amazing increase in our national debt.
[/quote]For a perspective, the $800 billion stimulus, about $300 billion of which was tax cuts, just about equals the amounts of cuts at the state and local levels.
August 3, 2011 at 4:01 PM #715431briansd1
Guest[quote=evolusd]I believe the only reason we had a ‘recovery’ over the last 28-24 months is due to massive government spending/stimulus funded by an amazing increase in our national debt.
[/quote]For a perspective, the $800 billion stimulus, about $300 billion of which was tax cuts, just about equals the amounts of cuts at the state and local levels.
August 3, 2011 at 4:01 PM #715585briansd1
Guest[quote=evolusd]I believe the only reason we had a ‘recovery’ over the last 28-24 months is due to massive government spending/stimulus funded by an amazing increase in our national debt.
[/quote]For a perspective, the $800 billion stimulus, about $300 billion of which was tax cuts, just about equals the amounts of cuts at the state and local levels.
August 3, 2011 at 4:01 PM #715946briansd1
Guest[quote=evolusd]I believe the only reason we had a ‘recovery’ over the last 28-24 months is due to massive government spending/stimulus funded by an amazing increase in our national debt.
[/quote]For a perspective, the $800 billion stimulus, about $300 billion of which was tax cuts, just about equals the amounts of cuts at the state and local levels.
August 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM #714742sdduuuude
ParticipantInteresting article from gregor.us, who seems like one of the brighter bloggers. Always has an interesting perspective:
http://gregor.us/policy/obsolete-expertise-and-the-us-economys-energy-problem/
The Great Recession has offered the perfect occasion to witness the phenomenon, a financial crisis which specifically kicked off amidst 150 dollar oil in 2008. Instead of advising the President that the country faced debt-deflation, with a nasty overlay of high commodity costs, the White House economic team has drawn from the post-war playbook which holds that if you stimulate the economy generally then the system will magically reorganize itself. Well, that hasn’t happened and it’s not going to happen.
August 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM #714833sdduuuude
ParticipantInteresting article from gregor.us, who seems like one of the brighter bloggers. Always has an interesting perspective:
http://gregor.us/policy/obsolete-expertise-and-the-us-economys-energy-problem/
The Great Recession has offered the perfect occasion to witness the phenomenon, a financial crisis which specifically kicked off amidst 150 dollar oil in 2008. Instead of advising the President that the country faced debt-deflation, with a nasty overlay of high commodity costs, the White House economic team has drawn from the post-war playbook which holds that if you stimulate the economy generally then the system will magically reorganize itself. Well, that hasn’t happened and it’s not going to happen.
August 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM #715436sdduuuude
ParticipantInteresting article from gregor.us, who seems like one of the brighter bloggers. Always has an interesting perspective:
http://gregor.us/policy/obsolete-expertise-and-the-us-economys-energy-problem/
The Great Recession has offered the perfect occasion to witness the phenomenon, a financial crisis which specifically kicked off amidst 150 dollar oil in 2008. Instead of advising the President that the country faced debt-deflation, with a nasty overlay of high commodity costs, the White House economic team has drawn from the post-war playbook which holds that if you stimulate the economy generally then the system will magically reorganize itself. Well, that hasn’t happened and it’s not going to happen.
August 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM #715590sdduuuude
ParticipantInteresting article from gregor.us, who seems like one of the brighter bloggers. Always has an interesting perspective:
http://gregor.us/policy/obsolete-expertise-and-the-us-economys-energy-problem/
The Great Recession has offered the perfect occasion to witness the phenomenon, a financial crisis which specifically kicked off amidst 150 dollar oil in 2008. Instead of advising the President that the country faced debt-deflation, with a nasty overlay of high commodity costs, the White House economic team has drawn from the post-war playbook which holds that if you stimulate the economy generally then the system will magically reorganize itself. Well, that hasn’t happened and it’s not going to happen.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.