- This topic has 65 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by bubba99.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 3, 2007 at 3:50 PM #108259December 3, 2007 at 4:30 PM #108397drunkleParticipant
from what i recall of his speech today, this article jives:
http://money.cnn.com/2007/12/03/real_estate/left_out.moneymag/index.htm?postversion=2007120318
essentially, a very thin slice of bitter debtors are eligible.
December 3, 2007 at 4:30 PM #108294drunkleParticipantfrom what i recall of his speech today, this article jives:
http://money.cnn.com/2007/12/03/real_estate/left_out.moneymag/index.htm?postversion=2007120318
essentially, a very thin slice of bitter debtors are eligible.
December 3, 2007 at 4:30 PM #108429drunkleParticipantfrom what i recall of his speech today, this article jives:
http://money.cnn.com/2007/12/03/real_estate/left_out.moneymag/index.htm?postversion=2007120318
essentially, a very thin slice of bitter debtors are eligible.
December 3, 2007 at 4:30 PM #108436drunkleParticipantfrom what i recall of his speech today, this article jives:
http://money.cnn.com/2007/12/03/real_estate/left_out.moneymag/index.htm?postversion=2007120318
essentially, a very thin slice of bitter debtors are eligible.
December 3, 2007 at 4:30 PM #108449drunkleParticipantfrom what i recall of his speech today, this article jives:
http://money.cnn.com/2007/12/03/real_estate/left_out.moneymag/index.htm?postversion=2007120318
essentially, a very thin slice of bitter debtors are eligible.
December 3, 2007 at 7:00 PM #108386rocket scienceParticipantThe article I read also indicated it is optional
In addtion it pointed out
A major hurdle to the deal has yet to be overcome: getting agreement from investors in mortgage-backed securities, who have resisted modifying loans except on a case-by-case basis.
"There is a $64,000 question: Will investors go along with this plan? And if not, can they be compelled to?" asked Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), chairman of Congress' Joint Economic Committee.
rs
December 3, 2007 at 7:00 PM #108540rocket scienceParticipantThe article I read also indicated it is optional
In addtion it pointed out
A major hurdle to the deal has yet to be overcome: getting agreement from investors in mortgage-backed securities, who have resisted modifying loans except on a case-by-case basis.
"There is a $64,000 question: Will investors go along with this plan? And if not, can they be compelled to?" asked Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), chairman of Congress' Joint Economic Committee.
rs
December 3, 2007 at 7:00 PM #108487rocket scienceParticipantThe article I read also indicated it is optional
In addtion it pointed out
A major hurdle to the deal has yet to be overcome: getting agreement from investors in mortgage-backed securities, who have resisted modifying loans except on a case-by-case basis.
"There is a $64,000 question: Will investors go along with this plan? And if not, can they be compelled to?" asked Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), chairman of Congress' Joint Economic Committee.
rs
December 3, 2007 at 7:00 PM #108525rocket scienceParticipantThe article I read also indicated it is optional
In addtion it pointed out
A major hurdle to the deal has yet to be overcome: getting agreement from investors in mortgage-backed securities, who have resisted modifying loans except on a case-by-case basis.
"There is a $64,000 question: Will investors go along with this plan? And if not, can they be compelled to?" asked Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), chairman of Congress' Joint Economic Committee.
rs
December 3, 2007 at 7:00 PM #108521rocket scienceParticipantThe article I read also indicated it is optional
In addtion it pointed out
A major hurdle to the deal has yet to be overcome: getting agreement from investors in mortgage-backed securities, who have resisted modifying loans except on a case-by-case basis.
"There is a $64,000 question: Will investors go along with this plan? And if not, can they be compelled to?" asked Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), chairman of Congress' Joint Economic Committee.
rs
December 3, 2007 at 7:12 PM #108391JerseyGrlParticipantToots
essentially, a very thin slice of bitter debtors are eligible………probably soFrom http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/12/paulsons-plan-is-nothing-but-lip.html
“The homeowner bailout sounds a lot better in the headlines than it does when you dig deeper. For instance, HomEq reports that for every 5,000 resets that come in every month, only 1,000 meet standards to even begin loan modification, and of those only 10% of borrowers actually begin the process. That’s 2% of all borrowers undergoing resets.
One of the problems is that in many cases, a W2 is required, and many of these homeowners are reluctant to provide one since they presumably lied about their income to qualify for a mortgage. Still others are in trouble not because of the reset, but because they can’t even afford their teaser rate. Many in foreclosure won’t pick up the phone when contacts are attempted from lenders.”
December 3, 2007 at 7:12 PM #108545JerseyGrlParticipantToots
essentially, a very thin slice of bitter debtors are eligible………probably soFrom http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/12/paulsons-plan-is-nothing-but-lip.html
“The homeowner bailout sounds a lot better in the headlines than it does when you dig deeper. For instance, HomEq reports that for every 5,000 resets that come in every month, only 1,000 meet standards to even begin loan modification, and of those only 10% of borrowers actually begin the process. That’s 2% of all borrowers undergoing resets.
One of the problems is that in many cases, a W2 is required, and many of these homeowners are reluctant to provide one since they presumably lied about their income to qualify for a mortgage. Still others are in trouble not because of the reset, but because they can’t even afford their teaser rate. Many in foreclosure won’t pick up the phone when contacts are attempted from lenders.”
December 3, 2007 at 7:12 PM #108529JerseyGrlParticipantToots
essentially, a very thin slice of bitter debtors are eligible………probably soFrom http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/12/paulsons-plan-is-nothing-but-lip.html
“The homeowner bailout sounds a lot better in the headlines than it does when you dig deeper. For instance, HomEq reports that for every 5,000 resets that come in every month, only 1,000 meet standards to even begin loan modification, and of those only 10% of borrowers actually begin the process. That’s 2% of all borrowers undergoing resets.
One of the problems is that in many cases, a W2 is required, and many of these homeowners are reluctant to provide one since they presumably lied about their income to qualify for a mortgage. Still others are in trouble not because of the reset, but because they can’t even afford their teaser rate. Many in foreclosure won’t pick up the phone when contacts are attempted from lenders.”
December 3, 2007 at 7:12 PM #108526JerseyGrlParticipantToots
essentially, a very thin slice of bitter debtors are eligible………probably soFrom http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/12/paulsons-plan-is-nothing-but-lip.html
“The homeowner bailout sounds a lot better in the headlines than it does when you dig deeper. For instance, HomEq reports that for every 5,000 resets that come in every month, only 1,000 meet standards to even begin loan modification, and of those only 10% of borrowers actually begin the process. That’s 2% of all borrowers undergoing resets.
One of the problems is that in many cases, a W2 is required, and many of these homeowners are reluctant to provide one since they presumably lied about their income to qualify for a mortgage. Still others are in trouble not because of the reset, but because they can’t even afford their teaser rate. Many in foreclosure won’t pick up the phone when contacts are attempted from lenders.”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.