- This topic has 185 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
Nor-LA-SD-guy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 27, 2009 at 1:35 PM #357056February 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM #356500
waiting hawk
Participant“My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”
Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.
February 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM #356804Participant“My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”
Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.
February 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM #356943Participant“My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”
Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.
February 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM #356969Participant“My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”
Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.
February 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM #357081Participant“My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”
Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.
February 27, 2009 at 3:12 PM #356555kewp
Participant[quote=waiting hawk]”My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”
Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.[/quote]
I was thinking more about nationally, but I appreciate the insight!
February 27, 2009 at 3:12 PM #356859Participant[quote=waiting hawk]”My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”
Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.[/quote]
I was thinking more about nationally, but I appreciate the insight!
February 27, 2009 at 3:12 PM #356998Participant[quote=waiting hawk]”My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”
Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.[/quote]
I was thinking more about nationally, but I appreciate the insight!
February 27, 2009 at 3:12 PM #357025Participant[quote=waiting hawk]”My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”
Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.[/quote]
I was thinking more about nationally, but I appreciate the insight!
February 27, 2009 at 3:12 PM #357136Participant[quote=waiting hawk]”My prediction for the last couple years was to watch for 1997 pricing as a bottom, if it keeps dropping watch for 1989. ”
Re Prices were most likly lower in 1997 than 1989 in So Cal.[/quote]
I was thinking more about nationally, but I appreciate the insight!
February 27, 2009 at 3:49 PM #356590NotCranky
ParticipantI think you have the right focus TG,
I bought a house in Normal Heights in 92 that with 10k in materials and some elbow grease rented for nearly twice the mortgage w/impounds.The point there is to show how far it was before the trough.People thinking comfort homes were getting in trouble and people thinking economics were doing O.K. and in some cases they were doing what I was doing many times over, with crews doing the grunt work.I am not saying it absolutely isn’t the end of the world, but if it is what difference does it make that you dumped some change into a few rentals? The odds are against the end of the world and favor you in every other way with that kind of initial cash flow.
February 27, 2009 at 3:49 PM #356895ParticipantI think you have the right focus TG,
I bought a house in Normal Heights in 92 that with 10k in materials and some elbow grease rented for nearly twice the mortgage w/impounds.The point there is to show how far it was before the trough.People thinking comfort homes were getting in trouble and people thinking economics were doing O.K. and in some cases they were doing what I was doing many times over, with crews doing the grunt work.I am not saying it absolutely isn’t the end of the world, but if it is what difference does it make that you dumped some change into a few rentals? The odds are against the end of the world and favor you in every other way with that kind of initial cash flow.
February 27, 2009 at 3:49 PM #357033ParticipantI think you have the right focus TG,
I bought a house in Normal Heights in 92 that with 10k in materials and some elbow grease rented for nearly twice the mortgage w/impounds.The point there is to show how far it was before the trough.People thinking comfort homes were getting in trouble and people thinking economics were doing O.K. and in some cases they were doing what I was doing many times over, with crews doing the grunt work.I am not saying it absolutely isn’t the end of the world, but if it is what difference does it make that you dumped some change into a few rentals? The odds are against the end of the world and favor you in every other way with that kind of initial cash flow.
February 27, 2009 at 3:49 PM #357059ParticipantI think you have the right focus TG,
I bought a house in Normal Heights in 92 that with 10k in materials and some elbow grease rented for nearly twice the mortgage w/impounds.The point there is to show how far it was before the trough.People thinking comfort homes were getting in trouble and people thinking economics were doing O.K. and in some cases they were doing what I was doing many times over, with crews doing the grunt work.I am not saying it absolutely isn’t the end of the world, but if it is what difference does it make that you dumped some change into a few rentals? The odds are against the end of the world and favor you in every other way with that kind of initial cash flow.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.