- This topic has 109 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 5 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 15, 2011 at 9:43 PM #711207July 16, 2011 at 8:53 AM #710058
Ren
Participant[quote=briansd1]
Back to the original topic of California. What would the red counties of California achieve if they were to separate from the more prosperous blue counties?[/quote]If you read the manifesto (http://californiarebellion2012.com/), quite a bit, but I’m not sure it would turn out the way they think. If they were able to pull it all off (part time legislature, etc.) I’d be all for it.
[quote]So how would the new South California fund its government?[/quote]
Not from mj taxes, that’s for sure. Dammit, I think I just switched back to Nor Cal. Now I’ll have to move.
July 16, 2011 at 8:53 AM #710154Participant[quote=briansd1]
Back to the original topic of California. What would the red counties of California achieve if they were to separate from the more prosperous blue counties?[/quote]If you read the manifesto (http://californiarebellion2012.com/), quite a bit, but I’m not sure it would turn out the way they think. If they were able to pull it all off (part time legislature, etc.) I’d be all for it.
[quote]So how would the new South California fund its government?[/quote]
Not from mj taxes, that’s for sure. Dammit, I think I just switched back to Nor Cal. Now I’ll have to move.
July 16, 2011 at 8:53 AM #710755Participant[quote=briansd1]
Back to the original topic of California. What would the red counties of California achieve if they were to separate from the more prosperous blue counties?[/quote]If you read the manifesto (http://californiarebellion2012.com/), quite a bit, but I’m not sure it would turn out the way they think. If they were able to pull it all off (part time legislature, etc.) I’d be all for it.
[quote]So how would the new South California fund its government?[/quote]
Not from mj taxes, that’s for sure. Dammit, I think I just switched back to Nor Cal. Now I’ll have to move.
July 16, 2011 at 8:53 AM #710908Participant[quote=briansd1]
Back to the original topic of California. What would the red counties of California achieve if they were to separate from the more prosperous blue counties?[/quote]If you read the manifesto (http://californiarebellion2012.com/), quite a bit, but I’m not sure it would turn out the way they think. If they were able to pull it all off (part time legislature, etc.) I’d be all for it.
[quote]So how would the new South California fund its government?[/quote]
Not from mj taxes, that’s for sure. Dammit, I think I just switched back to Nor Cal. Now I’ll have to move.
July 16, 2011 at 8:53 AM #711267Participant[quote=briansd1]
Back to the original topic of California. What would the red counties of California achieve if they were to separate from the more prosperous blue counties?[/quote]If you read the manifesto (http://californiarebellion2012.com/), quite a bit, but I’m not sure it would turn out the way they think. If they were able to pull it all off (part time legislature, etc.) I’d be all for it.
[quote]So how would the new South California fund its government?[/quote]
Not from mj taxes, that’s for sure. Dammit, I think I just switched back to Nor Cal. Now I’ll have to move.
July 17, 2011 at 1:36 PM #710238paramount
ParticipantA perfect example of why ideas like this (51st state) gain traction is the signing of the gay history education law by Brown last week.
July 17, 2011 at 1:36 PM #710336ParticipantA perfect example of why ideas like this (51st state) gain traction is the signing of the gay history education law by Brown last week.
July 17, 2011 at 1:36 PM #710935ParticipantA perfect example of why ideas like this (51st state) gain traction is the signing of the gay history education law by Brown last week.
July 17, 2011 at 1:36 PM #711090ParticipantA perfect example of why ideas like this (51st state) gain traction is the signing of the gay history education law by Brown last week.
July 17, 2011 at 1:36 PM #711447ParticipantA perfect example of why ideas like this (51st state) gain traction is the signing of the gay history education law by Brown last week.
July 17, 2011 at 4:06 PM #710253chrisM
ParticipantThere is no argueing than most state boundaries, especially in the Western states, make little economical, geographical or cultural sense. In this respect, there has been 51st state proposals that deserve consideration. I’m thinking in particular about the Delmarva Peninsula or the reunion of Eastern WA and the ID panhandle.
But clearly this is not the case here. A southern CA state with half of the central plain on the other side of the Tehachapi moutains but without LA??? This guy had to fail geography in elementary school to suggest such NONSENSE.
More seriously, if we were to start diving states purely along partisan lines, why just stop there? This is exactly the kind of centrifuge forces that, in the long run, would tear apart a nation that otherwise gets pride and strength from its diversity.
July 17, 2011 at 4:06 PM #710351ParticipantThere is no argueing than most state boundaries, especially in the Western states, make little economical, geographical or cultural sense. In this respect, there has been 51st state proposals that deserve consideration. I’m thinking in particular about the Delmarva Peninsula or the reunion of Eastern WA and the ID panhandle.
But clearly this is not the case here. A southern CA state with half of the central plain on the other side of the Tehachapi moutains but without LA??? This guy had to fail geography in elementary school to suggest such NONSENSE.
More seriously, if we were to start diving states purely along partisan lines, why just stop there? This is exactly the kind of centrifuge forces that, in the long run, would tear apart a nation that otherwise gets pride and strength from its diversity.
July 17, 2011 at 4:06 PM #710950ParticipantThere is no argueing than most state boundaries, especially in the Western states, make little economical, geographical or cultural sense. In this respect, there has been 51st state proposals that deserve consideration. I’m thinking in particular about the Delmarva Peninsula or the reunion of Eastern WA and the ID panhandle.
But clearly this is not the case here. A southern CA state with half of the central plain on the other side of the Tehachapi moutains but without LA??? This guy had to fail geography in elementary school to suggest such NONSENSE.
More seriously, if we were to start diving states purely along partisan lines, why just stop there? This is exactly the kind of centrifuge forces that, in the long run, would tear apart a nation that otherwise gets pride and strength from its diversity.
July 17, 2011 at 4:06 PM #711105ParticipantThere is no argueing than most state boundaries, especially in the Western states, make little economical, geographical or cultural sense. In this respect, there has been 51st state proposals that deserve consideration. I’m thinking in particular about the Delmarva Peninsula or the reunion of Eastern WA and the ID panhandle.
But clearly this is not the case here. A southern CA state with half of the central plain on the other side of the Tehachapi moutains but without LA??? This guy had to fail geography in elementary school to suggest such NONSENSE.
More seriously, if we were to start diving states purely along partisan lines, why just stop there? This is exactly the kind of centrifuge forces that, in the long run, would tear apart a nation that otherwise gets pride and strength from its diversity.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.