- This topic has 405 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by LuckyInOC.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 27, 2008 at 12:29 PM #293972October 27, 2008 at 12:41 PM #293575anParticipant
We all know by both tax plans that if you make over $112k, you’ll benefit more with McCain’s plans. Is $112k HOUSEHOLD income consider grape-pickers to you? If you make $112k, you’re in the top 85% household income. So you must be wealthy right? I mean, you’re richer than 85% of Americans.
October 27, 2008 at 12:41 PM #293905anParticipantWe all know by both tax plans that if you make over $112k, you’ll benefit more with McCain’s plans. Is $112k HOUSEHOLD income consider grape-pickers to you? If you make $112k, you’re in the top 85% household income. So you must be wealthy right? I mean, you’re richer than 85% of Americans.
October 27, 2008 at 12:41 PM #293929anParticipantWe all know by both tax plans that if you make over $112k, you’ll benefit more with McCain’s plans. Is $112k HOUSEHOLD income consider grape-pickers to you? If you make $112k, you’re in the top 85% household income. So you must be wealthy right? I mean, you’re richer than 85% of Americans.
October 27, 2008 at 12:41 PM #293941anParticipantWe all know by both tax plans that if you make over $112k, you’ll benefit more with McCain’s plans. Is $112k HOUSEHOLD income consider grape-pickers to you? If you make $112k, you’re in the top 85% household income. So you must be wealthy right? I mean, you’re richer than 85% of Americans.
October 27, 2008 at 12:41 PM #293977anParticipantWe all know by both tax plans that if you make over $112k, you’ll benefit more with McCain’s plans. Is $112k HOUSEHOLD income consider grape-pickers to you? If you make $112k, you’re in the top 85% household income. So you must be wealthy right? I mean, you’re richer than 85% of Americans.
October 27, 2008 at 12:53 PM #293595kewpParticipantVery ironic given the multi-trillion dollar tax-payer funded bailout of Wall Street tycoons.
If your little story reflected how the real world worked, the tip should have gone to the owner of the restaurant. After all, he’s giving the waiter a job, the customer dinner and the bum outside gets to eat for free out of the dumpster.
October 27, 2008 at 12:53 PM #293925kewpParticipantVery ironic given the multi-trillion dollar tax-payer funded bailout of Wall Street tycoons.
If your little story reflected how the real world worked, the tip should have gone to the owner of the restaurant. After all, he’s giving the waiter a job, the customer dinner and the bum outside gets to eat for free out of the dumpster.
October 27, 2008 at 12:53 PM #293949kewpParticipantVery ironic given the multi-trillion dollar tax-payer funded bailout of Wall Street tycoons.
If your little story reflected how the real world worked, the tip should have gone to the owner of the restaurant. After all, he’s giving the waiter a job, the customer dinner and the bum outside gets to eat for free out of the dumpster.
October 27, 2008 at 12:53 PM #293961kewpParticipantVery ironic given the multi-trillion dollar tax-payer funded bailout of Wall Street tycoons.
If your little story reflected how the real world worked, the tip should have gone to the owner of the restaurant. After all, he’s giving the waiter a job, the customer dinner and the bum outside gets to eat for free out of the dumpster.
October 27, 2008 at 12:53 PM #293997kewpParticipantVery ironic given the multi-trillion dollar tax-payer funded bailout of Wall Street tycoons.
If your little story reflected how the real world worked, the tip should have gone to the owner of the restaurant. After all, he’s giving the waiter a job, the customer dinner and the bum outside gets to eat for free out of the dumpster.
October 27, 2008 at 3:37 PM #293688GoUSCParticipantWe can talk back and forth about this all but when you historically look at tax plans, whenever there has been an increase in the tax rate there has be a decrease in the revenue brought into the Federal Government. The solution is not taxing the 10% of the population that already pays 70% of all taxes.
Oh and to Mister Grape and Grape-Picker. Obama’s idea that $250,000 constitutes a Grape Picker is bull crap.
My GF and I make combined around $250,000. We will be hit by Obama hard. Are we “rich” living here in San Diego? Certainly not. And yes it pisses me off that Obama wants to take money from me and my girlfriend who have worked very hard to get where we are…taking out school loans to forward our careers, chosing to live below our means and not running ourselves into massive credit card debt…and then have it redistributed to someone who doesn’t work as hard. Just because that’s the “right thing to do”.
The fact is in my career I am able to keep 100-200 people employeed just by doing what I do. Punishing me, in the long run, will only punish the people that work for me as I won’t be able to expend as much capital, grow the business etc. etc.
October 27, 2008 at 3:37 PM #294020GoUSCParticipantWe can talk back and forth about this all but when you historically look at tax plans, whenever there has been an increase in the tax rate there has be a decrease in the revenue brought into the Federal Government. The solution is not taxing the 10% of the population that already pays 70% of all taxes.
Oh and to Mister Grape and Grape-Picker. Obama’s idea that $250,000 constitutes a Grape Picker is bull crap.
My GF and I make combined around $250,000. We will be hit by Obama hard. Are we “rich” living here in San Diego? Certainly not. And yes it pisses me off that Obama wants to take money from me and my girlfriend who have worked very hard to get where we are…taking out school loans to forward our careers, chosing to live below our means and not running ourselves into massive credit card debt…and then have it redistributed to someone who doesn’t work as hard. Just because that’s the “right thing to do”.
The fact is in my career I am able to keep 100-200 people employeed just by doing what I do. Punishing me, in the long run, will only punish the people that work for me as I won’t be able to expend as much capital, grow the business etc. etc.
October 27, 2008 at 3:37 PM #294044GoUSCParticipantWe can talk back and forth about this all but when you historically look at tax plans, whenever there has been an increase in the tax rate there has be a decrease in the revenue brought into the Federal Government. The solution is not taxing the 10% of the population that already pays 70% of all taxes.
Oh and to Mister Grape and Grape-Picker. Obama’s idea that $250,000 constitutes a Grape Picker is bull crap.
My GF and I make combined around $250,000. We will be hit by Obama hard. Are we “rich” living here in San Diego? Certainly not. And yes it pisses me off that Obama wants to take money from me and my girlfriend who have worked very hard to get where we are…taking out school loans to forward our careers, chosing to live below our means and not running ourselves into massive credit card debt…and then have it redistributed to someone who doesn’t work as hard. Just because that’s the “right thing to do”.
The fact is in my career I am able to keep 100-200 people employeed just by doing what I do. Punishing me, in the long run, will only punish the people that work for me as I won’t be able to expend as much capital, grow the business etc. etc.
October 27, 2008 at 3:37 PM #294056GoUSCParticipantWe can talk back and forth about this all but when you historically look at tax plans, whenever there has been an increase in the tax rate there has be a decrease in the revenue brought into the Federal Government. The solution is not taxing the 10% of the population that already pays 70% of all taxes.
Oh and to Mister Grape and Grape-Picker. Obama’s idea that $250,000 constitutes a Grape Picker is bull crap.
My GF and I make combined around $250,000. We will be hit by Obama hard. Are we “rich” living here in San Diego? Certainly not. And yes it pisses me off that Obama wants to take money from me and my girlfriend who have worked very hard to get where we are…taking out school loans to forward our careers, chosing to live below our means and not running ourselves into massive credit card debt…and then have it redistributed to someone who doesn’t work as hard. Just because that’s the “right thing to do”.
The fact is in my career I am able to keep 100-200 people employeed just by doing what I do. Punishing me, in the long run, will only punish the people that work for me as I won’t be able to expend as much capital, grow the business etc. etc.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.