- This topic has 70 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by gn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 29, 2009 at 10:57 AM #421642June 29, 2009 at 11:23 AM #421902afx114Participant
I used to take the following route to go around LA, and while the mileage is certainly more, the savings on time from skipping traffic was worth it:
15N > 10W > 210W > 5N
Although I haven’t driven that route in years, so it very well could now be just as trafficky as going straight through LA.
Then again, I wouldn’t think you’d hit any traffic at 9pm unless you run into some construction or an accident.
Also, if you end up going the 405, take the roll road (73) from Laguna Niguel to Costa Mesa.. saves around 30-45 mins.
June 29, 2009 at 11:23 AM #422176afx114ParticipantI used to take the following route to go around LA, and while the mileage is certainly more, the savings on time from skipping traffic was worth it:
15N > 10W > 210W > 5N
Although I haven’t driven that route in years, so it very well could now be just as trafficky as going straight through LA.
Then again, I wouldn’t think you’d hit any traffic at 9pm unless you run into some construction or an accident.
Also, if you end up going the 405, take the roll road (73) from Laguna Niguel to Costa Mesa.. saves around 30-45 mins.
June 29, 2009 at 11:23 AM #422406afx114ParticipantI used to take the following route to go around LA, and while the mileage is certainly more, the savings on time from skipping traffic was worth it:
15N > 10W > 210W > 5N
Although I haven’t driven that route in years, so it very well could now be just as trafficky as going straight through LA.
Then again, I wouldn’t think you’d hit any traffic at 9pm unless you run into some construction or an accident.
Also, if you end up going the 405, take the roll road (73) from Laguna Niguel to Costa Mesa.. saves around 30-45 mins.
June 29, 2009 at 11:23 AM #422244afx114ParticipantI used to take the following route to go around LA, and while the mileage is certainly more, the savings on time from skipping traffic was worth it:
15N > 10W > 210W > 5N
Although I haven’t driven that route in years, so it very well could now be just as trafficky as going straight through LA.
Then again, I wouldn’t think you’d hit any traffic at 9pm unless you run into some construction or an accident.
Also, if you end up going the 405, take the roll road (73) from Laguna Niguel to Costa Mesa.. saves around 30-45 mins.
June 29, 2009 at 11:23 AM #421672afx114ParticipantI used to take the following route to go around LA, and while the mileage is certainly more, the savings on time from skipping traffic was worth it:
15N > 10W > 210W > 5N
Although I haven’t driven that route in years, so it very well could now be just as trafficky as going straight through LA.
Then again, I wouldn’t think you’d hit any traffic at 9pm unless you run into some construction or an accident.
Also, if you end up going the 405, take the roll road (73) from Laguna Niguel to Costa Mesa.. saves around 30-45 mins.
June 29, 2009 at 11:57 AM #422236AKParticipantI’m with afx114. Avoid the 5 at all costs, in particular the stretch through downtown L.A.
June 29, 2009 at 11:57 AM #421732AKParticipantI’m with afx114. Avoid the 5 at all costs, in particular the stretch through downtown L.A.
June 29, 2009 at 11:57 AM #422304AKParticipantI’m with afx114. Avoid the 5 at all costs, in particular the stretch through downtown L.A.
June 29, 2009 at 11:57 AM #421962AKParticipantI’m with afx114. Avoid the 5 at all costs, in particular the stretch through downtown L.A.
June 29, 2009 at 11:57 AM #422466AKParticipantI’m with afx114. Avoid the 5 at all costs, in particular the stretch through downtown L.A.
June 29, 2009 at 12:08 PM #422256svelteParticipantafx has the ticket.
I’ve tried them all many times and while
15N > 10W > 210W > 5N
doesn’t look logical, it’s the winner.
June 29, 2009 at 12:08 PM #421753svelteParticipantafx has the ticket.
I’ve tried them all many times and while
15N > 10W > 210W > 5N
doesn’t look logical, it’s the winner.
June 29, 2009 at 12:08 PM #422324svelteParticipantafx has the ticket.
I’ve tried them all many times and while
15N > 10W > 210W > 5N
doesn’t look logical, it’s the winner.
June 29, 2009 at 12:08 PM #422486svelteParticipantafx has the ticket.
I’ve tried them all many times and while
15N > 10W > 210W > 5N
doesn’t look logical, it’s the winner.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.