- This topic has 125 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 1, 2011 at 7:34 PM #662350February 1, 2011 at 7:42 PM #661231
briansd1
Guest[quote=Djshakes]And what is the difference between republicans and democrats now days other than the title?
[/quote]If they are the same, then why oppose one in favor of the other?
February 1, 2011 at 7:42 PM #661294Guest[quote=Djshakes]And what is the difference between republicans and democrats now days other than the title?
[/quote]If they are the same, then why oppose one in favor of the other?
February 1, 2011 at 7:42 PM #661898Guest[quote=Djshakes]And what is the difference between republicans and democrats now days other than the title?
[/quote]If they are the same, then why oppose one in favor of the other?
February 1, 2011 at 7:42 PM #662033Guest[quote=Djshakes]And what is the difference between republicans and democrats now days other than the title?
[/quote]If they are the same, then why oppose one in favor of the other?
February 1, 2011 at 7:42 PM #662365Guest[quote=Djshakes]And what is the difference between republicans and democrats now days other than the title?
[/quote]If they are the same, then why oppose one in favor of the other?
February 1, 2011 at 8:00 PM #661236surveyor
Participant[quote=pri_dk]
Can you point out the part of the Constitution that says a district judge has the power to overrule the President and the Congress?
[/quote]Article 3
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
February 1, 2011 at 8:00 PM #661299Participant[quote=pri_dk]
Can you point out the part of the Constitution that says a district judge has the power to overrule the President and the Congress?
[/quote]Article 3
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
February 1, 2011 at 8:00 PM #661903Participant[quote=pri_dk]
Can you point out the part of the Constitution that says a district judge has the power to overrule the President and the Congress?
[/quote]Article 3
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
February 1, 2011 at 8:00 PM #662038Participant[quote=pri_dk]
Can you point out the part of the Constitution that says a district judge has the power to overrule the President and the Congress?
[/quote]Article 3
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
February 1, 2011 at 8:00 PM #662370Participant[quote=pri_dk]
Can you point out the part of the Constitution that says a district judge has the power to overrule the President and the Congress?
[/quote]Article 3
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
February 1, 2011 at 8:08 PM #661241scaredyclassic
Participantyou guys are kinda jumpy on the trigger finger.
the above-referenced law bit is about jurisdiction–that is what types of cases can courts hear. There’s more rules. Lots more. You could spend a few years reading all the damned rules.
I’m not sure, but i think a little old district court decision doesn’t bind the whole u.s of a., at least that’s the way things generally work, the districts are divided up and what some wacko judge (not that this judge was a wacko, or indeed that any federal judges are necessarily wackos) in some far-flung distrcit doesn’t necessarily bind us way over here (where our judges aren’t necessarily any better, just different)..
and I think but am not sure that there are probably procedures for getting a stay pending review by higher courts on any kind of order. the calls for impeachment are a little goofy. im not pro obama or obamacare or anything, I’m just saying, this is not the government takeover or TEOTWAWKI or anything like that….we’re not anywhere near close to mussolini time. but bong hits and maybe some rat killing might be fun yor y’all while waiting for higher court review…also, im going to go get my cholesterol checked…im too old and tired for any non-rx drugs
February 1, 2011 at 8:08 PM #661304Participantyou guys are kinda jumpy on the trigger finger.
the above-referenced law bit is about jurisdiction–that is what types of cases can courts hear. There’s more rules. Lots more. You could spend a few years reading all the damned rules.
I’m not sure, but i think a little old district court decision doesn’t bind the whole u.s of a., at least that’s the way things generally work, the districts are divided up and what some wacko judge (not that this judge was a wacko, or indeed that any federal judges are necessarily wackos) in some far-flung distrcit doesn’t necessarily bind us way over here (where our judges aren’t necessarily any better, just different)..
and I think but am not sure that there are probably procedures for getting a stay pending review by higher courts on any kind of order. the calls for impeachment are a little goofy. im not pro obama or obamacare or anything, I’m just saying, this is not the government takeover or TEOTWAWKI or anything like that….we’re not anywhere near close to mussolini time. but bong hits and maybe some rat killing might be fun yor y’all while waiting for higher court review…also, im going to go get my cholesterol checked…im too old and tired for any non-rx drugs
February 1, 2011 at 8:08 PM #661908Participantyou guys are kinda jumpy on the trigger finger.
the above-referenced law bit is about jurisdiction–that is what types of cases can courts hear. There’s more rules. Lots more. You could spend a few years reading all the damned rules.
I’m not sure, but i think a little old district court decision doesn’t bind the whole u.s of a., at least that’s the way things generally work, the districts are divided up and what some wacko judge (not that this judge was a wacko, or indeed that any federal judges are necessarily wackos) in some far-flung distrcit doesn’t necessarily bind us way over here (where our judges aren’t necessarily any better, just different)..
and I think but am not sure that there are probably procedures for getting a stay pending review by higher courts on any kind of order. the calls for impeachment are a little goofy. im not pro obama or obamacare or anything, I’m just saying, this is not the government takeover or TEOTWAWKI or anything like that….we’re not anywhere near close to mussolini time. but bong hits and maybe some rat killing might be fun yor y’all while waiting for higher court review…also, im going to go get my cholesterol checked…im too old and tired for any non-rx drugs
February 1, 2011 at 8:08 PM #662043Participantyou guys are kinda jumpy on the trigger finger.
the above-referenced law bit is about jurisdiction–that is what types of cases can courts hear. There’s more rules. Lots more. You could spend a few years reading all the damned rules.
I’m not sure, but i think a little old district court decision doesn’t bind the whole u.s of a., at least that’s the way things generally work, the districts are divided up and what some wacko judge (not that this judge was a wacko, or indeed that any federal judges are necessarily wackos) in some far-flung distrcit doesn’t necessarily bind us way over here (where our judges aren’t necessarily any better, just different)..
and I think but am not sure that there are probably procedures for getting a stay pending review by higher courts on any kind of order. the calls for impeachment are a little goofy. im not pro obama or obamacare or anything, I’m just saying, this is not the government takeover or TEOTWAWKI or anything like that….we’re not anywhere near close to mussolini time. but bong hits and maybe some rat killing might be fun yor y’all while waiting for higher court review…also, im going to go get my cholesterol checked…im too old and tired for any non-rx drugs
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
