- This topic has 925 replies, 34 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 10 months ago by Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 10, 2011 at 8:08 AM #651371January 10, 2011 at 8:21 AM #650281NotCrankyParticipant
Great post Surveyor,
So you basically demonstrate that the left and the right will do anything to get votes, Terrorism, endorsing and giving venue to religious nuts through their charlatan leaders…whatever it takes… and so what if it makes the U.S. the first Yosemite Sam meets Jerry Springer sovereign.January 10, 2011 at 8:21 AM #650349NotCrankyParticipantGreat post Surveyor,
So you basically demonstrate that the left and the right will do anything to get votes, Terrorism, endorsing and giving venue to religious nuts through their charlatan leaders…whatever it takes… and so what if it makes the U.S. the first Yosemite Sam meets Jerry Springer sovereign.January 10, 2011 at 8:21 AM #650931NotCrankyParticipantGreat post Surveyor,
So you basically demonstrate that the left and the right will do anything to get votes, Terrorism, endorsing and giving venue to religious nuts through their charlatan leaders…whatever it takes… and so what if it makes the U.S. the first Yosemite Sam meets Jerry Springer sovereign.January 10, 2011 at 8:21 AM #651068NotCrankyParticipantGreat post Surveyor,
So you basically demonstrate that the left and the right will do anything to get votes, Terrorism, endorsing and giving venue to religious nuts through their charlatan leaders…whatever it takes… and so what if it makes the U.S. the first Yosemite Sam meets Jerry Springer sovereign.January 10, 2011 at 8:21 AM #651391NotCrankyParticipantGreat post Surveyor,
So you basically demonstrate that the left and the right will do anything to get votes, Terrorism, endorsing and giving venue to religious nuts through their charlatan leaders…whatever it takes… and so what if it makes the U.S. the first Yosemite Sam meets Jerry Springer sovereign.January 10, 2011 at 8:26 AM #650291afx114ParticipantI can not help but bathe in the irony of surveyor’s post, seeing that the Palin camp has come out and stated that no, those weren’t crosshairs on their map, they were surveyor’s symbols! Is surveyor Sarah Palin?
And the Democratic map was clearly a map of Target locations. They have groceries now, you know.
January 10, 2011 at 8:26 AM #650359afx114ParticipantI can not help but bathe in the irony of surveyor’s post, seeing that the Palin camp has come out and stated that no, those weren’t crosshairs on their map, they were surveyor’s symbols! Is surveyor Sarah Palin?
And the Democratic map was clearly a map of Target locations. They have groceries now, you know.
January 10, 2011 at 8:26 AM #650941afx114ParticipantI can not help but bathe in the irony of surveyor’s post, seeing that the Palin camp has come out and stated that no, those weren’t crosshairs on their map, they were surveyor’s symbols! Is surveyor Sarah Palin?
And the Democratic map was clearly a map of Target locations. They have groceries now, you know.
January 10, 2011 at 8:26 AM #651078afx114ParticipantI can not help but bathe in the irony of surveyor’s post, seeing that the Palin camp has come out and stated that no, those weren’t crosshairs on their map, they were surveyor’s symbols! Is surveyor Sarah Palin?
And the Democratic map was clearly a map of Target locations. They have groceries now, you know.
January 10, 2011 at 8:26 AM #651401afx114ParticipantI can not help but bathe in the irony of surveyor’s post, seeing that the Palin camp has come out and stated that no, those weren’t crosshairs on their map, they were surveyor’s symbols! Is surveyor Sarah Palin?
And the Democratic map was clearly a map of Target locations. They have groceries now, you know.
January 10, 2011 at 8:27 AM #650286afx114ParticipantHere’s a good article with a historical perspective on political asassinations and their motives: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/01/the-cloudy-logic-of-political-shootings/69147/
The takeaway is that most of the time, an asassin’s political leanings generally have little or nothing to do with their actions, eg: Reagan was shot to impress Jodie Foster. However, causitic political environments create a scenario where a deranged individual can get more bang for their buck. So while this dude may not have been a card-carrying Tea Party member, he most certainly seized on the environment they have created to make a bigger statement than he otherwise could have.
January 10, 2011 at 8:27 AM #650354afx114ParticipantHere’s a good article with a historical perspective on political asassinations and their motives: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/01/the-cloudy-logic-of-political-shootings/69147/
The takeaway is that most of the time, an asassin’s political leanings generally have little or nothing to do with their actions, eg: Reagan was shot to impress Jodie Foster. However, causitic political environments create a scenario where a deranged individual can get more bang for their buck. So while this dude may not have been a card-carrying Tea Party member, he most certainly seized on the environment they have created to make a bigger statement than he otherwise could have.
January 10, 2011 at 8:27 AM #650936afx114ParticipantHere’s a good article with a historical perspective on political asassinations and their motives: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/01/the-cloudy-logic-of-political-shootings/69147/
The takeaway is that most of the time, an asassin’s political leanings generally have little or nothing to do with their actions, eg: Reagan was shot to impress Jodie Foster. However, causitic political environments create a scenario where a deranged individual can get more bang for their buck. So while this dude may not have been a card-carrying Tea Party member, he most certainly seized on the environment they have created to make a bigger statement than he otherwise could have.
January 10, 2011 at 8:27 AM #651073afx114ParticipantHere’s a good article with a historical perspective on political asassinations and their motives: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/01/the-cloudy-logic-of-political-shootings/69147/
The takeaway is that most of the time, an asassin’s political leanings generally have little or nothing to do with their actions, eg: Reagan was shot to impress Jodie Foster. However, causitic political environments create a scenario where a deranged individual can get more bang for their buck. So while this dude may not have been a card-carrying Tea Party member, he most certainly seized on the environment they have created to make a bigger statement than he otherwise could have.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.