- This topic has 925 replies, 34 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by
Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 14, 2011 at 2:23 PM #654962January 14, 2011 at 2:38 PM #653855
Djshakes
Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=Rustico]Brian, When you go around carelessly using labels like “Redneck” and conflating whoever they supposedly are with evil, you are doing what Bush did…you are doing what every bigot from the beginning of time has done.[/quote]
I don’t disagree.
I do it for effect rather than out of belief. You have to talk the language of Glen Beck and Limbaugh for their adherents to understand.
If someone calls you a dumbass, it’s serves no purpose to respond “that was not very polite”.
As Allan has said before, words have meanings and consequences. But will the Right tone down the vitriol first?[/quote]
It wasn’t the right that came out guns blazing point to the left as the reason of the shooting. It was quite the opposite. The left planted the seed most of the media propagated it. The right hand no choice but to defend themselves and the left then points at their defense as vitriol. Give me a break.
January 14, 2011 at 2:38 PM #653922Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=Rustico]Brian, When you go around carelessly using labels like “Redneck” and conflating whoever they supposedly are with evil, you are doing what Bush did…you are doing what every bigot from the beginning of time has done.[/quote]
I don’t disagree.
I do it for effect rather than out of belief. You have to talk the language of Glen Beck and Limbaugh for their adherents to understand.
If someone calls you a dumbass, it’s serves no purpose to respond “that was not very polite”.
As Allan has said before, words have meanings and consequences. But will the Right tone down the vitriol first?[/quote]
It wasn’t the right that came out guns blazing point to the left as the reason of the shooting. It was quite the opposite. The left planted the seed most of the media propagated it. The right hand no choice but to defend themselves and the left then points at their defense as vitriol. Give me a break.
January 14, 2011 at 2:38 PM #654507Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=Rustico]Brian, When you go around carelessly using labels like “Redneck” and conflating whoever they supposedly are with evil, you are doing what Bush did…you are doing what every bigot from the beginning of time has done.[/quote]
I don’t disagree.
I do it for effect rather than out of belief. You have to talk the language of Glen Beck and Limbaugh for their adherents to understand.
If someone calls you a dumbass, it’s serves no purpose to respond “that was not very polite”.
As Allan has said before, words have meanings and consequences. But will the Right tone down the vitriol first?[/quote]
It wasn’t the right that came out guns blazing point to the left as the reason of the shooting. It was quite the opposite. The left planted the seed most of the media propagated it. The right hand no choice but to defend themselves and the left then points at their defense as vitriol. Give me a break.
January 14, 2011 at 2:38 PM #654644Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=Rustico]Brian, When you go around carelessly using labels like “Redneck” and conflating whoever they supposedly are with evil, you are doing what Bush did…you are doing what every bigot from the beginning of time has done.[/quote]
I don’t disagree.
I do it for effect rather than out of belief. You have to talk the language of Glen Beck and Limbaugh for their adherents to understand.
If someone calls you a dumbass, it’s serves no purpose to respond “that was not very polite”.
As Allan has said before, words have meanings and consequences. But will the Right tone down the vitriol first?[/quote]
It wasn’t the right that came out guns blazing point to the left as the reason of the shooting. It was quite the opposite. The left planted the seed most of the media propagated it. The right hand no choice but to defend themselves and the left then points at their defense as vitriol. Give me a break.
January 14, 2011 at 2:38 PM #654972Participant[quote=briansd1][quote=Rustico]Brian, When you go around carelessly using labels like “Redneck” and conflating whoever they supposedly are with evil, you are doing what Bush did…you are doing what every bigot from the beginning of time has done.[/quote]
I don’t disagree.
I do it for effect rather than out of belief. You have to talk the language of Glen Beck and Limbaugh for their adherents to understand.
If someone calls you a dumbass, it’s serves no purpose to respond “that was not very polite”.
As Allan has said before, words have meanings and consequences. But will the Right tone down the vitriol first?[/quote]
It wasn’t the right that came out guns blazing point to the left as the reason of the shooting. It was quite the opposite. The left planted the seed most of the media propagated it. The right hand no choice but to defend themselves and the left then points at their defense as vitriol. Give me a break.
January 14, 2011 at 5:21 PM #654014briansd1
GuestIt’s undeniable that right wing groups have used violent rhetoric to motivate their troops.
As a consequence, it’s no surprise that the press is wondering if there’s a connection between inflammatory speech and violence.
Interesting interview with a psychologist:
http://hereandnow.wbur.org/2011/01/10/arizona-mental-healthJanuary 14, 2011 at 5:21 PM #654080GuestIt’s undeniable that right wing groups have used violent rhetoric to motivate their troops.
As a consequence, it’s no surprise that the press is wondering if there’s a connection between inflammatory speech and violence.
Interesting interview with a psychologist:
http://hereandnow.wbur.org/2011/01/10/arizona-mental-healthJanuary 14, 2011 at 5:21 PM #654667GuestIt’s undeniable that right wing groups have used violent rhetoric to motivate their troops.
As a consequence, it’s no surprise that the press is wondering if there’s a connection between inflammatory speech and violence.
Interesting interview with a psychologist:
http://hereandnow.wbur.org/2011/01/10/arizona-mental-healthJanuary 14, 2011 at 5:21 PM #654803GuestIt’s undeniable that right wing groups have used violent rhetoric to motivate their troops.
As a consequence, it’s no surprise that the press is wondering if there’s a connection between inflammatory speech and violence.
Interesting interview with a psychologist:
http://hereandnow.wbur.org/2011/01/10/arizona-mental-healthJanuary 14, 2011 at 5:21 PM #655133GuestIt’s undeniable that right wing groups have used violent rhetoric to motivate their troops.
As a consequence, it’s no surprise that the press is wondering if there’s a connection between inflammatory speech and violence.
Interesting interview with a psychologist:
http://hereandnow.wbur.org/2011/01/10/arizona-mental-healthJanuary 15, 2011 at 1:19 AM #654246CA renter
Participant[quote=bubba99]Point taken, blaming any rable rouser for violence is misplaced. But blaming Bernake for the greatest robbery in history would probably be appropriate.[/quote]
Yes!!!!
January 15, 2011 at 1:19 AM #654311Participant[quote=bubba99]Point taken, blaming any rable rouser for violence is misplaced. But blaming Bernake for the greatest robbery in history would probably be appropriate.[/quote]
Yes!!!!
January 15, 2011 at 1:19 AM #654900Participant[quote=bubba99]Point taken, blaming any rable rouser for violence is misplaced. But blaming Bernake for the greatest robbery in history would probably be appropriate.[/quote]
Yes!!!!
January 15, 2011 at 1:19 AM #655038Participant[quote=bubba99]Point taken, blaming any rable rouser for violence is misplaced. But blaming Bernake for the greatest robbery in history would probably be appropriate.[/quote]
Yes!!!!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.