- This topic has 195 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by
Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 1, 2009 at 9:34 AM #423900July 1, 2009 at 9:49 AM #423179
Zeitgeist
Participantsdgrrl,
You are the hater. Unlike you who is drawn to the personality, pup is against the policies that are drowning this country in debt, not the man. He is a charming man. Unfortunately, he was not ready for prime time and the undisciplined socialists he has surrounded himself with are hell bent to turn the economic miracle of the United States into Sweden, without the homogeneous population to make it work.As for 2012, they will probably be able to run anyone and win because it will be anyone but Obama by that time. Keep hating and by all means, don’t examine the facts.
July 1, 2009 at 9:49 AM #423410Zeitgeist
Participantsdgrrl,
You are the hater. Unlike you who is drawn to the personality, pup is against the policies that are drowning this country in debt, not the man. He is a charming man. Unfortunately, he was not ready for prime time and the undisciplined socialists he has surrounded himself with are hell bent to turn the economic miracle of the United States into Sweden, without the homogeneous population to make it work.As for 2012, they will probably be able to run anyone and win because it will be anyone but Obama by that time. Keep hating and by all means, don’t examine the facts.
July 1, 2009 at 9:49 AM #423687Zeitgeist
Participantsdgrrl,
You are the hater. Unlike you who is drawn to the personality, pup is against the policies that are drowning this country in debt, not the man. He is a charming man. Unfortunately, he was not ready for prime time and the undisciplined socialists he has surrounded himself with are hell bent to turn the economic miracle of the United States into Sweden, without the homogeneous population to make it work.As for 2012, they will probably be able to run anyone and win because it will be anyone but Obama by that time. Keep hating and by all means, don’t examine the facts.
July 1, 2009 at 9:49 AM #423756Zeitgeist
Participantsdgrrl,
You are the hater. Unlike you who is drawn to the personality, pup is against the policies that are drowning this country in debt, not the man. He is a charming man. Unfortunately, he was not ready for prime time and the undisciplined socialists he has surrounded himself with are hell bent to turn the economic miracle of the United States into Sweden, without the homogeneous population to make it work.As for 2012, they will probably be able to run anyone and win because it will be anyone but Obama by that time. Keep hating and by all means, don’t examine the facts.
July 1, 2009 at 9:49 AM #423920Zeitgeist
Participantsdgrrl,
You are the hater. Unlike you who is drawn to the personality, pup is against the policies that are drowning this country in debt, not the man. He is a charming man. Unfortunately, he was not ready for prime time and the undisciplined socialists he has surrounded himself with are hell bent to turn the economic miracle of the United States into Sweden, without the homogeneous population to make it work.As for 2012, they will probably be able to run anyone and win because it will be anyone but Obama by that time. Keep hating and by all means, don’t examine the facts.
July 1, 2009 at 10:02 AM #423189sdgrrl
Participantzeitgeist…you are a genius and I hope you alone can save this country from becoming…Sweden? Yes. Yes. Hitler, Stalin and Sweden? The three fit so well together. That nasty Sweden known for harboring…clocks?
Yes I am the ultimate hater? Of what? Of who? Did I hate Bush? Yep. Why? Policies. Sure sure I’m the hater, but when its on your side its thoughtful deliberation.
Also, I’m glad facts finally mean something to you. Did you care about facts last year or the year before? Nahhh…only if its a Dem in charge.
July 1, 2009 at 10:02 AM #423420sdgrrl
Participantzeitgeist…you are a genius and I hope you alone can save this country from becoming…Sweden? Yes. Yes. Hitler, Stalin and Sweden? The three fit so well together. That nasty Sweden known for harboring…clocks?
Yes I am the ultimate hater? Of what? Of who? Did I hate Bush? Yep. Why? Policies. Sure sure I’m the hater, but when its on your side its thoughtful deliberation.
Also, I’m glad facts finally mean something to you. Did you care about facts last year or the year before? Nahhh…only if its a Dem in charge.
July 1, 2009 at 10:02 AM #423697sdgrrl
Participantzeitgeist…you are a genius and I hope you alone can save this country from becoming…Sweden? Yes. Yes. Hitler, Stalin and Sweden? The three fit so well together. That nasty Sweden known for harboring…clocks?
Yes I am the ultimate hater? Of what? Of who? Did I hate Bush? Yep. Why? Policies. Sure sure I’m the hater, but when its on your side its thoughtful deliberation.
Also, I’m glad facts finally mean something to you. Did you care about facts last year or the year before? Nahhh…only if its a Dem in charge.
July 1, 2009 at 10:02 AM #423766sdgrrl
Participantzeitgeist…you are a genius and I hope you alone can save this country from becoming…Sweden? Yes. Yes. Hitler, Stalin and Sweden? The three fit so well together. That nasty Sweden known for harboring…clocks?
Yes I am the ultimate hater? Of what? Of who? Did I hate Bush? Yep. Why? Policies. Sure sure I’m the hater, but when its on your side its thoughtful deliberation.
Also, I’m glad facts finally mean something to you. Did you care about facts last year or the year before? Nahhh…only if its a Dem in charge.
July 1, 2009 at 10:02 AM #423930sdgrrl
Participantzeitgeist…you are a genius and I hope you alone can save this country from becoming…Sweden? Yes. Yes. Hitler, Stalin and Sweden? The three fit so well together. That nasty Sweden known for harboring…clocks?
Yes I am the ultimate hater? Of what? Of who? Did I hate Bush? Yep. Why? Policies. Sure sure I’m the hater, but when its on your side its thoughtful deliberation.
Also, I’m glad facts finally mean something to you. Did you care about facts last year or the year before? Nahhh…only if its a Dem in charge.
July 1, 2009 at 10:05 AM #423199sdgrrl
Participantpartypup I take you at your word and apologize for throwing you into one category. Seriously and without any sarcasm I apologize.
Sincerely,
Shannon
July 1, 2009 at 10:05 AM #423430sdgrrl
Participantpartypup I take you at your word and apologize for throwing you into one category. Seriously and without any sarcasm I apologize.
Sincerely,
Shannon
July 1, 2009 at 10:05 AM #423707sdgrrl
Participantpartypup I take you at your word and apologize for throwing you into one category. Seriously and without any sarcasm I apologize.
Sincerely,
Shannon
July 1, 2009 at 10:05 AM #423776sdgrrl
Participantpartypup I take you at your word and apologize for throwing you into one category. Seriously and without any sarcasm I apologize.
Sincerely,
Shannon
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.