- This topic has 55 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by enron_by_the_sea.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 30, 2010 at 2:16 PM #585281July 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM #585598jpinpbParticipant
[quote=DataAgent]However, I read both political parties (Dems and Reps) are against it. [/quote]
Great. Politicians owned by banks AND drug dealers. How the heck does the government plan to pay for all the bailouts? This is the perfect way to get around raising taxes. I don’t even partake. It just makes financial sense.
July 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM #585188jpinpbParticipant[quote=DataAgent]However, I read both political parties (Dems and Reps) are against it. [/quote]
Great. Politicians owned by banks AND drug dealers. How the heck does the government plan to pay for all the bailouts? This is the perfect way to get around raising taxes. I don’t even partake. It just makes financial sense.
July 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM #585296jpinpbParticipant[quote=DataAgent]However, I read both political parties (Dems and Reps) are against it. [/quote]
Great. Politicians owned by banks AND drug dealers. How the heck does the government plan to pay for all the bailouts? This is the perfect way to get around raising taxes. I don’t even partake. It just makes financial sense.
July 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM #584652jpinpbParticipant[quote=DataAgent]However, I read both political parties (Dems and Reps) are against it. [/quote]
Great. Politicians owned by banks AND drug dealers. How the heck does the government plan to pay for all the bailouts? This is the perfect way to get around raising taxes. I don’t even partake. It just makes financial sense.
July 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM #584561jpinpbParticipant[quote=DataAgent]However, I read both political parties (Dems and Reps) are against it. [/quote]
Great. Politicians owned by banks AND drug dealers. How the heck does the government plan to pay for all the bailouts? This is the perfect way to get around raising taxes. I don’t even partake. It just makes financial sense.
July 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM #585286enron_by_the_seaParticipantFor me this will fall into the catagory – Vote “No” by default on any proposition.
[IMO Prop.s should be only used for rare initiatives for public good. I don’t see this as that important thing to get in front of people bypassing elected rep.s. Passing routine laws (like this) should best be left to the legislature whose job it is to pass it.]
July 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM #584551enron_by_the_seaParticipantFor me this will fall into the catagory – Vote “No” by default on any proposition.
[IMO Prop.s should be only used for rare initiatives for public good. I don’t see this as that important thing to get in front of people bypassing elected rep.s. Passing routine laws (like this) should best be left to the legislature whose job it is to pass it.]
July 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM #584642enron_by_the_seaParticipantFor me this will fall into the catagory – Vote “No” by default on any proposition.
[IMO Prop.s should be only used for rare initiatives for public good. I don’t see this as that important thing to get in front of people bypassing elected rep.s. Passing routine laws (like this) should best be left to the legislature whose job it is to pass it.]
July 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM #585588enron_by_the_seaParticipantFor me this will fall into the catagory – Vote “No” by default on any proposition.
[IMO Prop.s should be only used for rare initiatives for public good. I don’t see this as that important thing to get in front of people bypassing elected rep.s. Passing routine laws (like this) should best be left to the legislature whose job it is to pass it.]
July 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM #585178enron_by_the_seaParticipantFor me this will fall into the catagory – Vote “No” by default on any proposition.
[IMO Prop.s should be only used for rare initiatives for public good. I don’t see this as that important thing to get in front of people bypassing elected rep.s. Passing routine laws (like this) should best be left to the legislature whose job it is to pass it.]
July 30, 2010 at 2:34 PM #585603enron_by_the_seaParticipantOn a lighter note: If this passes, can we please remove the bear from our state flag and put hemp there:) ?
July 30, 2010 at 2:34 PM #585193enron_by_the_seaParticipantOn a lighter note: If this passes, can we please remove the bear from our state flag and put hemp there:) ?
July 30, 2010 at 2:34 PM #585301enron_by_the_seaParticipantOn a lighter note: If this passes, can we please remove the bear from our state flag and put hemp there:) ?
July 30, 2010 at 2:34 PM #584566enron_by_the_seaParticipantOn a lighter note: If this passes, can we please remove the bear from our state flag and put hemp there:) ?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.