- This topic has 260 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by Zeitgeist.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 16, 2009 at 2:54 PM #470886October 16, 2009 at 3:27 PM #470072briansd1Guest
[quote=Zeitgeist]My beef is they are run by people who interpret history rather than factually report it. Go back and read some of Allan’s questions to you and point out where you answered any of them. [/quote]
If you don’t interpret history and learn from it, then what do you with it?
I don’t pose questions to Allan. And I wouldn’t expect him to answer my all my questions even if I did. This is not middle school where someone is the teacher and gets to assign the homework.
I did answer some of Allan’s questions (the plantation business question for example).
Zeitgeist, if anyone should banned from Piggington it is you for constantly spamming with links to other sites without offering context and relevance.
October 16, 2009 at 3:27 PM #470252briansd1Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]My beef is they are run by people who interpret history rather than factually report it. Go back and read some of Allan’s questions to you and point out where you answered any of them. [/quote]
If you don’t interpret history and learn from it, then what do you with it?
I don’t pose questions to Allan. And I wouldn’t expect him to answer my all my questions even if I did. This is not middle school where someone is the teacher and gets to assign the homework.
I did answer some of Allan’s questions (the plantation business question for example).
Zeitgeist, if anyone should banned from Piggington it is you for constantly spamming with links to other sites without offering context and relevance.
October 16, 2009 at 3:27 PM #470606briansd1Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]My beef is they are run by people who interpret history rather than factually report it. Go back and read some of Allan’s questions to you and point out where you answered any of them. [/quote]
If you don’t interpret history and learn from it, then what do you with it?
I don’t pose questions to Allan. And I wouldn’t expect him to answer my all my questions even if I did. This is not middle school where someone is the teacher and gets to assign the homework.
I did answer some of Allan’s questions (the plantation business question for example).
Zeitgeist, if anyone should banned from Piggington it is you for constantly spamming with links to other sites without offering context and relevance.
October 16, 2009 at 3:27 PM #470680briansd1Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]My beef is they are run by people who interpret history rather than factually report it. Go back and read some of Allan’s questions to you and point out where you answered any of them. [/quote]
If you don’t interpret history and learn from it, then what do you with it?
I don’t pose questions to Allan. And I wouldn’t expect him to answer my all my questions even if I did. This is not middle school where someone is the teacher and gets to assign the homework.
I did answer some of Allan’s questions (the plantation business question for example).
Zeitgeist, if anyone should banned from Piggington it is you for constantly spamming with links to other sites without offering context and relevance.
October 16, 2009 at 3:27 PM #470896briansd1Guest[quote=Zeitgeist]My beef is they are run by people who interpret history rather than factually report it. Go back and read some of Allan’s questions to you and point out where you answered any of them. [/quote]
If you don’t interpret history and learn from it, then what do you with it?
I don’t pose questions to Allan. And I wouldn’t expect him to answer my all my questions even if I did. This is not middle school where someone is the teacher and gets to assign the homework.
I did answer some of Allan’s questions (the plantation business question for example).
Zeitgeist, if anyone should banned from Piggington it is you for constantly spamming with links to other sites without offering context and relevance.
October 16, 2009 at 6:42 PM #470116ZeitgeistParticipantDon’t go to the link. I put them there as a reference, like a footnote, in case anyone wants to see the entire article.
October 16, 2009 at 6:42 PM #470297ZeitgeistParticipantDon’t go to the link. I put them there as a reference, like a footnote, in case anyone wants to see the entire article.
October 16, 2009 at 6:42 PM #470651ZeitgeistParticipantDon’t go to the link. I put them there as a reference, like a footnote, in case anyone wants to see the entire article.
October 16, 2009 at 6:42 PM #470725ZeitgeistParticipantDon’t go to the link. I put them there as a reference, like a footnote, in case anyone wants to see the entire article.
October 16, 2009 at 6:42 PM #470940ZeitgeistParticipantDon’t go to the link. I put them there as a reference, like a footnote, in case anyone wants to see the entire article.
October 16, 2009 at 7:13 PM #470126briansd1GuestZeitgeist, consistently posting links to obscure sites without comments to make the links relevant to the discussion thread is spam.
It would be like spamming advertising to drive traffic to the sites in question — sites that people don’t know to go to on their own.
It seems like you’re relentlessly trying to generate traffic from Piggington to the linked sites.
If one links to a major news outlet then everyone knows that it’s a reference to current events.
If one links to youtube, then people know that it’s a funny video or something like that.
Zeitgeist, what you do is different. You are the only one who regularly spams to conservative opinion blogs.
October 16, 2009 at 7:13 PM #470307briansd1GuestZeitgeist, consistently posting links to obscure sites without comments to make the links relevant to the discussion thread is spam.
It would be like spamming advertising to drive traffic to the sites in question — sites that people don’t know to go to on their own.
It seems like you’re relentlessly trying to generate traffic from Piggington to the linked sites.
If one links to a major news outlet then everyone knows that it’s a reference to current events.
If one links to youtube, then people know that it’s a funny video or something like that.
Zeitgeist, what you do is different. You are the only one who regularly spams to conservative opinion blogs.
October 16, 2009 at 7:13 PM #470661briansd1GuestZeitgeist, consistently posting links to obscure sites without comments to make the links relevant to the discussion thread is spam.
It would be like spamming advertising to drive traffic to the sites in question — sites that people don’t know to go to on their own.
It seems like you’re relentlessly trying to generate traffic from Piggington to the linked sites.
If one links to a major news outlet then everyone knows that it’s a reference to current events.
If one links to youtube, then people know that it’s a funny video or something like that.
Zeitgeist, what you do is different. You are the only one who regularly spams to conservative opinion blogs.
October 16, 2009 at 7:13 PM #470736briansd1GuestZeitgeist, consistently posting links to obscure sites without comments to make the links relevant to the discussion thread is spam.
It would be like spamming advertising to drive traffic to the sites in question — sites that people don’t know to go to on their own.
It seems like you’re relentlessly trying to generate traffic from Piggington to the linked sites.
If one links to a major news outlet then everyone knows that it’s a reference to current events.
If one links to youtube, then people know that it’s a funny video or something like that.
Zeitgeist, what you do is different. You are the only one who regularly spams to conservative opinion blogs.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.