- This topic has 145 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by
SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 24, 2008 at 6:49 PM #292918October 24, 2008 at 7:13 PM #292528
patientrenter
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]esmith I usually agree with your posts but I think this one is pretty far off the mark.
[/quote]
Well, I prefer it when civilized, peaceful, people can discuss all subjects without piffling around, but esmith, you should know that not everyone will appreciate your position on this, and your raising it. Arranging to profit from a stock going down is considered aggressive but perfectly acceptable in polite company. Arranging to profit from a person going down, especially a leader who inspires millions is going to be thought of…. differently. Your bet is harmless, and may be well-calculated. Our discussion of it is also harmless. But I sure hope you lose this bet, for all our sakes.
October 24, 2008 at 7:13 PM #292852Participant[quote=SD Realtor]esmith I usually agree with your posts but I think this one is pretty far off the mark.
[/quote]
Well, I prefer it when civilized, peaceful, people can discuss all subjects without piffling around, but esmith, you should know that not everyone will appreciate your position on this, and your raising it. Arranging to profit from a stock going down is considered aggressive but perfectly acceptable in polite company. Arranging to profit from a person going down, especially a leader who inspires millions is going to be thought of…. differently. Your bet is harmless, and may be well-calculated. Our discussion of it is also harmless. But I sure hope you lose this bet, for all our sakes.
October 24, 2008 at 7:13 PM #292879Participant[quote=SD Realtor]esmith I usually agree with your posts but I think this one is pretty far off the mark.
[/quote]
Well, I prefer it when civilized, peaceful, people can discuss all subjects without piffling around, but esmith, you should know that not everyone will appreciate your position on this, and your raising it. Arranging to profit from a stock going down is considered aggressive but perfectly acceptable in polite company. Arranging to profit from a person going down, especially a leader who inspires millions is going to be thought of…. differently. Your bet is harmless, and may be well-calculated. Our discussion of it is also harmless. But I sure hope you lose this bet, for all our sakes.
October 24, 2008 at 7:13 PM #292890Participant[quote=SD Realtor]esmith I usually agree with your posts but I think this one is pretty far off the mark.
[/quote]
Well, I prefer it when civilized, peaceful, people can discuss all subjects without piffling around, but esmith, you should know that not everyone will appreciate your position on this, and your raising it. Arranging to profit from a stock going down is considered aggressive but perfectly acceptable in polite company. Arranging to profit from a person going down, especially a leader who inspires millions is going to be thought of…. differently. Your bet is harmless, and may be well-calculated. Our discussion of it is also harmless. But I sure hope you lose this bet, for all our sakes.
October 24, 2008 at 7:13 PM #292927Participant[quote=SD Realtor]esmith I usually agree with your posts but I think this one is pretty far off the mark.
[/quote]
Well, I prefer it when civilized, peaceful, people can discuss all subjects without piffling around, but esmith, you should know that not everyone will appreciate your position on this, and your raising it. Arranging to profit from a stock going down is considered aggressive but perfectly acceptable in polite company. Arranging to profit from a person going down, especially a leader who inspires millions is going to be thought of…. differently. Your bet is harmless, and may be well-calculated. Our discussion of it is also harmless. But I sure hope you lose this bet, for all our sakes.
October 24, 2008 at 8:51 PM #292553kewp
Participant[quote=esmith]
Why, is it immoral to bet on someone’s death? It’s not like I’m planning to off him myself.[/quote]Because he has family.
Seriously dude, don’t be a douchebag.
October 24, 2008 at 8:51 PM #292876Participant[quote=esmith]
Why, is it immoral to bet on someone’s death? It’s not like I’m planning to off him myself.[/quote]Because he has family.
Seriously dude, don’t be a douchebag.
October 24, 2008 at 8:51 PM #292904Participant[quote=esmith]
Why, is it immoral to bet on someone’s death? It’s not like I’m planning to off him myself.[/quote]Because he has family.
Seriously dude, don’t be a douchebag.
October 24, 2008 at 8:51 PM #292915Participant[quote=esmith]
Why, is it immoral to bet on someone’s death? It’s not like I’m planning to off him myself.[/quote]Because he has family.
Seriously dude, don’t be a douchebag.
October 24, 2008 at 8:51 PM #292951Participant[quote=esmith]
Why, is it immoral to bet on someone’s death? It’s not like I’m planning to off him myself.[/quote]Because he has family.
Seriously dude, don’t be a douchebag.
October 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM #292563moneymaker
ParticipantI’m betting esmith will end up in the pokey between now and the election, duh. He might want to make a run for the border, TJ might be safer.
October 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM #292887ParticipantI’m betting esmith will end up in the pokey between now and the election, duh. He might want to make a run for the border, TJ might be safer.
October 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM #292914ParticipantI’m betting esmith will end up in the pokey between now and the election, duh. He might want to make a run for the border, TJ might be safer.
October 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM #292925ParticipantI’m betting esmith will end up in the pokey between now and the election, duh. He might want to make a run for the border, TJ might be safer.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.