- This topic has 525 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 11 months ago by
spdrun.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 18, 2011 at 5:29 PM #679544March 18, 2011 at 5:46 PM #678418
CA renter
Participant[quote=zk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Zk: I have no plan whatsoever. I just don’t like Gaddafi Duck. I say if we have a chance to eject his happy ass, we do so and forthwith.[/quote]
Well, obviously we need a long-term plan before we start bombing and shooting. I don’t like gadhafi either. But I don’t think that’s nearly enough reason to go to war.
Even if we could eject him rather easily, why would we? What are the odds that the next regime would be better? I’d say 50/50 at best. Getting rid of him might be easy, but getting who we want in there most likely wouldn’t be.[/quote]
That’s always the tricky part, isn’t it.
March 18, 2011 at 5:46 PM #678472CA renter
Participant[quote=zk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Zk: I have no plan whatsoever. I just don’t like Gaddafi Duck. I say if we have a chance to eject his happy ass, we do so and forthwith.[/quote]
Well, obviously we need a long-term plan before we start bombing and shooting. I don’t like gadhafi either. But I don’t think that’s nearly enough reason to go to war.
Even if we could eject him rather easily, why would we? What are the odds that the next regime would be better? I’d say 50/50 at best. Getting rid of him might be easy, but getting who we want in there most likely wouldn’t be.[/quote]
That’s always the tricky part, isn’t it.
March 18, 2011 at 5:46 PM #679075CA renter
Participant[quote=zk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Zk: I have no plan whatsoever. I just don’t like Gaddafi Duck. I say if we have a chance to eject his happy ass, we do so and forthwith.[/quote]
Well, obviously we need a long-term plan before we start bombing and shooting. I don’t like gadhafi either. But I don’t think that’s nearly enough reason to go to war.
Even if we could eject him rather easily, why would we? What are the odds that the next regime would be better? I’d say 50/50 at best. Getting rid of him might be easy, but getting who we want in there most likely wouldn’t be.[/quote]
That’s always the tricky part, isn’t it.
March 18, 2011 at 5:46 PM #679210CA renter
Participant[quote=zk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Zk: I have no plan whatsoever. I just don’t like Gaddafi Duck. I say if we have a chance to eject his happy ass, we do so and forthwith.[/quote]
Well, obviously we need a long-term plan before we start bombing and shooting. I don’t like gadhafi either. But I don’t think that’s nearly enough reason to go to war.
Even if we could eject him rather easily, why would we? What are the odds that the next regime would be better? I’d say 50/50 at best. Getting rid of him might be easy, but getting who we want in there most likely wouldn’t be.[/quote]
That’s always the tricky part, isn’t it.
March 18, 2011 at 5:46 PM #679554CA renter
Participant[quote=zk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Zk: I have no plan whatsoever. I just don’t like Gaddafi Duck. I say if we have a chance to eject his happy ass, we do so and forthwith.[/quote]
Well, obviously we need a long-term plan before we start bombing and shooting. I don’t like gadhafi either. But I don’t think that’s nearly enough reason to go to war.
Even if we could eject him rather easily, why would we? What are the odds that the next regime would be better? I’d say 50/50 at best. Getting rid of him might be easy, but getting who we want in there most likely wouldn’t be.[/quote]
That’s always the tricky part, isn’t it.
March 18, 2011 at 6:04 PM #678432zk
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
I have no plan whatsoever. I just don’t like Gaddafi Duck. I say if we have a chance to eject his happy ass, we do so and forthwith.[/quote]
Substitute hussein for gadhafi, and I think that’s exactly what GWB said. And we all know how that turned out.
March 18, 2011 at 6:04 PM #678487zk
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
I have no plan whatsoever. I just don’t like Gaddafi Duck. I say if we have a chance to eject his happy ass, we do so and forthwith.[/quote]
Substitute hussein for gadhafi, and I think that’s exactly what GWB said. And we all know how that turned out.
March 18, 2011 at 6:04 PM #679090zk
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
I have no plan whatsoever. I just don’t like Gaddafi Duck. I say if we have a chance to eject his happy ass, we do so and forthwith.[/quote]
Substitute hussein for gadhafi, and I think that’s exactly what GWB said. And we all know how that turned out.
March 18, 2011 at 6:04 PM #679225zk
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
I have no plan whatsoever. I just don’t like Gaddafi Duck. I say if we have a chance to eject his happy ass, we do so and forthwith.[/quote]
Substitute hussein for gadhafi, and I think that’s exactly what GWB said. And we all know how that turned out.
March 18, 2011 at 6:04 PM #679569zk
Participant[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
I have no plan whatsoever. I just don’t like Gaddafi Duck. I say if we have a chance to eject his happy ass, we do so and forthwith.[/quote]
Substitute hussein for gadhafi, and I think that’s exactly what GWB said. And we all know how that turned out.
March 18, 2011 at 9:00 PM #678456Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=zk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
I have no plan whatsoever. I just don’t like Gaddafi Duck. I say if we have a chance to eject his happy ass, we do so and forthwith.[/quote]
Substitute hussein for gadhafi, and I think that’s exactly what GWB said. And we all know how that turned out.[/quote]
Zk: Nope, not what I was saying at all. I’m not advocating invasion, hell, I’m not even advocating commitment of US air power. I’m following the old Bill Clinton “chuck a cruise missile at an aspirin factory” routine.
You have an active rebellion in place. All they need is a little help (i.e. keep Gaddafi’s planes from bombing the crap out of ’em).
March 18, 2011 at 9:00 PM #678511Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=zk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
I have no plan whatsoever. I just don’t like Gaddafi Duck. I say if we have a chance to eject his happy ass, we do so and forthwith.[/quote]
Substitute hussein for gadhafi, and I think that’s exactly what GWB said. And we all know how that turned out.[/quote]
Zk: Nope, not what I was saying at all. I’m not advocating invasion, hell, I’m not even advocating commitment of US air power. I’m following the old Bill Clinton “chuck a cruise missile at an aspirin factory” routine.
You have an active rebellion in place. All they need is a little help (i.e. keep Gaddafi’s planes from bombing the crap out of ’em).
March 18, 2011 at 9:00 PM #679115Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=zk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
I have no plan whatsoever. I just don’t like Gaddafi Duck. I say if we have a chance to eject his happy ass, we do so and forthwith.[/quote]
Substitute hussein for gadhafi, and I think that’s exactly what GWB said. And we all know how that turned out.[/quote]
Zk: Nope, not what I was saying at all. I’m not advocating invasion, hell, I’m not even advocating commitment of US air power. I’m following the old Bill Clinton “chuck a cruise missile at an aspirin factory” routine.
You have an active rebellion in place. All they need is a little help (i.e. keep Gaddafi’s planes from bombing the crap out of ’em).
March 18, 2011 at 9:00 PM #679249Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=zk][quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
I have no plan whatsoever. I just don’t like Gaddafi Duck. I say if we have a chance to eject his happy ass, we do so and forthwith.[/quote]
Substitute hussein for gadhafi, and I think that’s exactly what GWB said. And we all know how that turned out.[/quote]
Zk: Nope, not what I was saying at all. I’m not advocating invasion, hell, I’m not even advocating commitment of US air power. I’m following the old Bill Clinton “chuck a cruise missile at an aspirin factory” routine.
You have an active rebellion in place. All they need is a little help (i.e. keep Gaddafi’s planes from bombing the crap out of ’em).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
