OT – Nuclear Fallout Map

[ILoveRegulation]

[quote=flu]Don’t think to hard….It will kill you or send you to the shrink.)[/quote]

Which of us is most likely thinking too hard? You with your irrational fear of NPR reporting too many facts and receiving a tiny, tiny, infinitesimal portion of the federal budget? Or me, who is justifiably concerned about receiving an above-average dose of radiation from Japan for months on end?

How about you drink a tall glass of STFU for once?

[ILoveRegulation]

Quote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:

“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”

http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html

[ILoveRegulation]

Quote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:

“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”

http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html

[ILoveRegulation]

Quote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:

“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”

http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html

[ILoveRegulation]

Quote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:

“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”

http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html

[ILoveRegulation]

Quote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:

“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”

http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html

[Arraya]

http://www.oftwominds.com/blogmar11/global-recovery-over3-11.html
OK, let’s run through the list:

1. Natural disaster dusrupts production in a key global exporter: check.

2. An event which nudges a major economy into financial crisis: check. (If you don’t think Japan’s economy and finances will be pushed over a threshold by the quake, please be patient.)

3. Ignite a chain reaction of mass movements in a key oil exporting region: check.

4. Supply-demand imbalances in critical materials and grains: check.

5. Central banks and sovereign states addicted to vast quantities of printing-money and credit creation stimulus which trigger rampant inflation in essentials: check.

6. Massaged statistics, channel-stuffing, misrepresentation of risk and unlimited propaganda by a failed Status Quo: check.

Does anyone seriously think the global recovery is still intact? Based on what? Does anyone think that stagnant/declining wages, falling real estate values, skyrocketing prices for materials and energy, and belt-tightening by bankrupt States are ideal foundations for higher profits?

Anyone who doesn’t realize the quake in Japan is a tragic load dumped on a fragile addict’s quivering back (i.e. the global recovery) will undoubtedly be surprised by how fast the global economy will start unraveling. Anyone who kept their eyes open is only wondering how a debt and propaganda-fueled recovery lasted this long.

[Arraya]

http://www.oftwominds.com/blogmar11/global-recovery-over3-11.html
OK, let’s run through the list:

1. Natural disaster dusrupts production in a key global exporter: check.

2. An event which nudges a major economy into financial crisis: check. (If you don’t think Japan’s economy and finances will be pushed over a threshold by the quake, please be patient.)

3. Ignite a chain reaction of mass movements in a key oil exporting region: check.

4. Supply-demand imbalances in critical materials and grains: check.

5. Central banks and sovereign states addicted to vast quantities of printing-money and credit creation stimulus which trigger rampant inflation in essentials: check.

6. Massaged statistics, channel-stuffing, misrepresentation of risk and unlimited propaganda by a failed Status Quo: check.

Does anyone seriously think the global recovery is still intact? Based on what? Does anyone think that stagnant/declining wages, falling real estate values, skyrocketing prices for materials and energy, and belt-tightening by bankrupt States are ideal foundations for higher profits?

Anyone who doesn’t realize the quake in Japan is a tragic load dumped on a fragile addict’s quivering back (i.e. the global recovery) will undoubtedly be surprised by how fast the global economy will start unraveling. Anyone who kept their eyes open is only wondering how a debt and propaganda-fueled recovery lasted this long.

[Arraya]

http://www.oftwominds.com/blogmar11/global-recovery-over3-11.html
OK, let’s run through the list:

1. Natural disaster dusrupts production in a key global exporter: check.

2. An event which nudges a major economy into financial crisis: check. (If you don’t think Japan’s economy and finances will be pushed over a threshold by the quake, please be patient.)

3. Ignite a chain reaction of mass movements in a key oil exporting region: check.

4. Supply-demand imbalances in critical materials and grains: check.

5. Central banks and sovereign states addicted to vast quantities of printing-money and credit creation stimulus which trigger rampant inflation in essentials: check.

6. Massaged statistics, channel-stuffing, misrepresentation of risk and unlimited propaganda by a failed Status Quo: check.

Does anyone seriously think the global recovery is still intact? Based on what? Does anyone think that stagnant/declining wages, falling real estate values, skyrocketing prices for materials and energy, and belt-tightening by bankrupt States are ideal foundations for higher profits?

Anyone who doesn’t realize the quake in Japan is a tragic load dumped on a fragile addict’s quivering back (i.e. the global recovery) will undoubtedly be surprised by how fast the global economy will start unraveling. Anyone who kept their eyes open is only wondering how a debt and propaganda-fueled recovery lasted this long.

[Arraya]

http://www.oftwominds.com/blogmar11/global-recovery-over3-11.html
OK, let’s run through the list:

1. Natural disaster dusrupts production in a key global exporter: check.

2. An event which nudges a major economy into financial crisis: check. (If you don’t think Japan’s economy and finances will be pushed over a threshold by the quake, please be patient.)

3. Ignite a chain reaction of mass movements in a key oil exporting region: check.

4. Supply-demand imbalances in critical materials and grains: check.

5. Central banks and sovereign states addicted to vast quantities of printing-money and credit creation stimulus which trigger rampant inflation in essentials: check.

6. Massaged statistics, channel-stuffing, misrepresentation of risk and unlimited propaganda by a failed Status Quo: check.

Does anyone seriously think the global recovery is still intact? Based on what? Does anyone think that stagnant/declining wages, falling real estate values, skyrocketing prices for materials and energy, and belt-tightening by bankrupt States are ideal foundations for higher profits?

Anyone who doesn’t realize the quake in Japan is a tragic load dumped on a fragile addict’s quivering back (i.e. the global recovery) will undoubtedly be surprised by how fast the global economy will start unraveling. Anyone who kept their eyes open is only wondering how a debt and propaganda-fueled recovery lasted this long.

[Arraya]

http://www.oftwominds.com/blogmar11/global-recovery-over3-11.html
OK, let’s run through the list:

1. Natural disaster dusrupts production in a key global exporter: check.

2. An event which nudges a major economy into financial crisis: check. (If you don’t think Japan’s economy and finances will be pushed over a threshold by the quake, please be patient.)

3. Ignite a chain reaction of mass movements in a key oil exporting region: check.

4. Supply-demand imbalances in critical materials and grains: check.

5. Central banks and sovereign states addicted to vast quantities of printing-money and credit creation stimulus which trigger rampant inflation in essentials: check.

6. Massaged statistics, channel-stuffing, misrepresentation of risk and unlimited propaganda by a failed Status Quo: check.

Does anyone seriously think the global recovery is still intact? Based on what? Does anyone think that stagnant/declining wages, falling real estate values, skyrocketing prices for materials and energy, and belt-tightening by bankrupt States are ideal foundations for higher profits?

Anyone who doesn’t realize the quake in Japan is a tragic load dumped on a fragile addict’s quivering back (i.e. the global recovery) will undoubtedly be surprised by how fast the global economy will start unraveling. Anyone who kept their eyes open is only wondering how a debt and propaganda-fueled recovery lasted this long.

[zk]

[quote=ILoveRegulation]Quote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:

“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”

http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html%5B/quote%5D

DeMeo sells radiation protection suits. Not exactly an unimpeachable source.

I never cease to be amazed at how people are unable to discern what’s truly dangerous and what’s not. Every time you get in your car, you’re taking a far bigger risk than anything that radiation from this incident will cause you here on the west coast. And if you drive over the speed limit, text while driving, drive without paying full attention or drive after just one or two drinks, you’re adding an amount of risk that compares to the risk from this radiation incident as Everest compares to the pile of salt I put on my eggs. Which pile of salt is also more dangerous than said radiation.

[zk]

[quote=ILoveRegulation]Quote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:

“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”

http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html%5B/quote%5D

DeMeo sells radiation protection suits. Not exactly an unimpeachable source.

I never cease to be amazed at how people are unable to discern what’s truly dangerous and what’s not. Every time you get in your car, you’re taking a far bigger risk than anything that radiation from this incident will cause you here on the west coast. And if you drive over the speed limit, text while driving, drive without paying full attention or drive after just one or two drinks, you’re adding an amount of risk that compares to the risk from this radiation incident as Everest compares to the pile of salt I put on my eggs. Which pile of salt is also more dangerous than said radiation.

[zk]

[quote=ILoveRegulation]Quote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:

“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”

http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html%5B/quote%5D

DeMeo sells radiation protection suits. Not exactly an unimpeachable source.

I never cease to be amazed at how people are unable to discern what’s truly dangerous and what’s not. Every time you get in your car, you’re taking a far bigger risk than anything that radiation from this incident will cause you here on the west coast. And if you drive over the speed limit, text while driving, drive without paying full attention or drive after just one or two drinks, you’re adding an amount of risk that compares to the risk from this radiation incident as Everest compares to the pile of salt I put on my eggs. Which pile of salt is also more dangerous than said radiation.

[zk]

[quote=ILoveRegulation]Quote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:

“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”

http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html%5B/quote%5D

DeMeo sells radiation protection suits. Not exactly an unimpeachable source.

I never cease to be amazed at how people are unable to discern what’s truly dangerous and what’s not. Every time you get in your car, you’re taking a far bigger risk than anything that radiation from this incident will cause you here on the west coast. And if you drive over the speed limit, text while driving, drive without paying full attention or drive after just one or two drinks, you’re adding an amount of risk that compares to the risk from this radiation incident as Everest compares to the pile of salt I put on my eggs. Which pile of salt is also more dangerous than said radiation.

[Author]

Posts