- This topic has 525 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 1 month ago by
spdrun.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 17, 2011 at 7:29 AM #678964March 17, 2011 at 7:40 AM #677833
ILoveRegulation
ParticipantQuote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:
“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html
March 17, 2011 at 7:40 AM #677889ILoveRegulation
ParticipantQuote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:
“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html
March 17, 2011 at 7:40 AM #678490ILoveRegulation
ParticipantQuote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:
“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html
March 17, 2011 at 7:40 AM #678627ILoveRegulation
ParticipantQuote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:
“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html
March 17, 2011 at 7:40 AM #678969ILoveRegulation
ParticipantQuote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:
“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html
March 17, 2011 at 7:42 AM #677838Arraya
Participanthttp://www.oftwominds.com/blogmar11/global-recovery-over3-11.html
OK, let’s run through the list:1. Natural disaster dusrupts production in a key global exporter: check.
2. An event which nudges a major economy into financial crisis: check. (If you don’t think Japan’s economy and finances will be pushed over a threshold by the quake, please be patient.)
3. Ignite a chain reaction of mass movements in a key oil exporting region: check.
4. Supply-demand imbalances in critical materials and grains: check.
5. Central banks and sovereign states addicted to vast quantities of printing-money and credit creation stimulus which trigger rampant inflation in essentials: check.
6. Massaged statistics, channel-stuffing, misrepresentation of risk and unlimited propaganda by a failed Status Quo: check.
Does anyone seriously think the global recovery is still intact? Based on what? Does anyone think that stagnant/declining wages, falling real estate values, skyrocketing prices for materials and energy, and belt-tightening by bankrupt States are ideal foundations for higher profits?
Anyone who doesn’t realize the quake in Japan is a tragic load dumped on a fragile addict’s quivering back (i.e. the global recovery) will undoubtedly be surprised by how fast the global economy will start unraveling. Anyone who kept their eyes open is only wondering how a debt and propaganda-fueled recovery lasted this long.
March 17, 2011 at 7:42 AM #677894Arraya
Participanthttp://www.oftwominds.com/blogmar11/global-recovery-over3-11.html
OK, let’s run through the list:1. Natural disaster dusrupts production in a key global exporter: check.
2. An event which nudges a major economy into financial crisis: check. (If you don’t think Japan’s economy and finances will be pushed over a threshold by the quake, please be patient.)
3. Ignite a chain reaction of mass movements in a key oil exporting region: check.
4. Supply-demand imbalances in critical materials and grains: check.
5. Central banks and sovereign states addicted to vast quantities of printing-money and credit creation stimulus which trigger rampant inflation in essentials: check.
6. Massaged statistics, channel-stuffing, misrepresentation of risk and unlimited propaganda by a failed Status Quo: check.
Does anyone seriously think the global recovery is still intact? Based on what? Does anyone think that stagnant/declining wages, falling real estate values, skyrocketing prices for materials and energy, and belt-tightening by bankrupt States are ideal foundations for higher profits?
Anyone who doesn’t realize the quake in Japan is a tragic load dumped on a fragile addict’s quivering back (i.e. the global recovery) will undoubtedly be surprised by how fast the global economy will start unraveling. Anyone who kept their eyes open is only wondering how a debt and propaganda-fueled recovery lasted this long.
March 17, 2011 at 7:42 AM #678495Arraya
Participanthttp://www.oftwominds.com/blogmar11/global-recovery-over3-11.html
OK, let’s run through the list:1. Natural disaster dusrupts production in a key global exporter: check.
2. An event which nudges a major economy into financial crisis: check. (If you don’t think Japan’s economy and finances will be pushed over a threshold by the quake, please be patient.)
3. Ignite a chain reaction of mass movements in a key oil exporting region: check.
4. Supply-demand imbalances in critical materials and grains: check.
5. Central banks and sovereign states addicted to vast quantities of printing-money and credit creation stimulus which trigger rampant inflation in essentials: check.
6. Massaged statistics, channel-stuffing, misrepresentation of risk and unlimited propaganda by a failed Status Quo: check.
Does anyone seriously think the global recovery is still intact? Based on what? Does anyone think that stagnant/declining wages, falling real estate values, skyrocketing prices for materials and energy, and belt-tightening by bankrupt States are ideal foundations for higher profits?
Anyone who doesn’t realize the quake in Japan is a tragic load dumped on a fragile addict’s quivering back (i.e. the global recovery) will undoubtedly be surprised by how fast the global economy will start unraveling. Anyone who kept their eyes open is only wondering how a debt and propaganda-fueled recovery lasted this long.
March 17, 2011 at 7:42 AM #678632Arraya
Participanthttp://www.oftwominds.com/blogmar11/global-recovery-over3-11.html
OK, let’s run through the list:1. Natural disaster dusrupts production in a key global exporter: check.
2. An event which nudges a major economy into financial crisis: check. (If you don’t think Japan’s economy and finances will be pushed over a threshold by the quake, please be patient.)
3. Ignite a chain reaction of mass movements in a key oil exporting region: check.
4. Supply-demand imbalances in critical materials and grains: check.
5. Central banks and sovereign states addicted to vast quantities of printing-money and credit creation stimulus which trigger rampant inflation in essentials: check.
6. Massaged statistics, channel-stuffing, misrepresentation of risk and unlimited propaganda by a failed Status Quo: check.
Does anyone seriously think the global recovery is still intact? Based on what? Does anyone think that stagnant/declining wages, falling real estate values, skyrocketing prices for materials and energy, and belt-tightening by bankrupt States are ideal foundations for higher profits?
Anyone who doesn’t realize the quake in Japan is a tragic load dumped on a fragile addict’s quivering back (i.e. the global recovery) will undoubtedly be surprised by how fast the global economy will start unraveling. Anyone who kept their eyes open is only wondering how a debt and propaganda-fueled recovery lasted this long.
March 17, 2011 at 7:42 AM #678974Arraya
Participanthttp://www.oftwominds.com/blogmar11/global-recovery-over3-11.html
OK, let’s run through the list:1. Natural disaster dusrupts production in a key global exporter: check.
2. An event which nudges a major economy into financial crisis: check. (If you don’t think Japan’s economy and finances will be pushed over a threshold by the quake, please be patient.)
3. Ignite a chain reaction of mass movements in a key oil exporting region: check.
4. Supply-demand imbalances in critical materials and grains: check.
5. Central banks and sovereign states addicted to vast quantities of printing-money and credit creation stimulus which trigger rampant inflation in essentials: check.
6. Massaged statistics, channel-stuffing, misrepresentation of risk and unlimited propaganda by a failed Status Quo: check.
Does anyone seriously think the global recovery is still intact? Based on what? Does anyone think that stagnant/declining wages, falling real estate values, skyrocketing prices for materials and energy, and belt-tightening by bankrupt States are ideal foundations for higher profits?
Anyone who doesn’t realize the quake in Japan is a tragic load dumped on a fragile addict’s quivering back (i.e. the global recovery) will undoubtedly be surprised by how fast the global economy will start unraveling. Anyone who kept their eyes open is only wondering how a debt and propaganda-fueled recovery lasted this long.
March 17, 2011 at 9:04 AM #677848zk
Participant[quote=ILoveRegulation]Quote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:
“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html%5B/quote%5D
DeMeo sells radiation protection suits. Not exactly an unimpeachable source.
I never cease to be amazed at how people are unable to discern what’s truly dangerous and what’s not. Every time you get in your car, you’re taking a far bigger risk than anything that radiation from this incident will cause you here on the west coast. And if you drive over the speed limit, text while driving, drive without paying full attention or drive after just one or two drinks, you’re adding an amount of risk that compares to the risk from this radiation incident as Everest compares to the pile of salt I put on my eggs. Which pile of salt is also more dangerous than said radiation.
March 17, 2011 at 9:04 AM #677904zk
Participant[quote=ILoveRegulation]Quote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:
“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html%5B/quote%5D
DeMeo sells radiation protection suits. Not exactly an unimpeachable source.
I never cease to be amazed at how people are unable to discern what’s truly dangerous and what’s not. Every time you get in your car, you’re taking a far bigger risk than anything that radiation from this incident will cause you here on the west coast. And if you drive over the speed limit, text while driving, drive without paying full attention or drive after just one or two drinks, you’re adding an amount of risk that compares to the risk from this radiation incident as Everest compares to the pile of salt I put on my eggs. Which pile of salt is also more dangerous than said radiation.
March 17, 2011 at 9:04 AM #678505zk
Participant[quote=ILoveRegulation]Quote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:
“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html%5B/quote%5D
DeMeo sells radiation protection suits. Not exactly an unimpeachable source.
I never cease to be amazed at how people are unable to discern what’s truly dangerous and what’s not. Every time you get in your car, you’re taking a far bigger risk than anything that radiation from this incident will cause you here on the west coast. And if you drive over the speed limit, text while driving, drive without paying full attention or drive after just one or two drinks, you’re adding an amount of risk that compares to the risk from this radiation incident as Everest compares to the pile of salt I put on my eggs. Which pile of salt is also more dangerous than said radiation.
March 17, 2011 at 9:04 AM #678642zk
Participant[quote=ILoveRegulation]Quote from a doctor who works around radiation every day:
“I really think it’s the wrong message. We really have to take this seriously,” DeMeo said. “Even low dose radiation exposure can increase your risk of cancer. Some people act like it’s a food group and it’s harmless. It’s not.”
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/16/2118690/radiation-suits-from-south-florida.html%5B/quote%5D
DeMeo sells radiation protection suits. Not exactly an unimpeachable source.
I never cease to be amazed at how people are unable to discern what’s truly dangerous and what’s not. Every time you get in your car, you’re taking a far bigger risk than anything that radiation from this incident will cause you here on the west coast. And if you drive over the speed limit, text while driving, drive without paying full attention or drive after just one or two drinks, you’re adding an amount of risk that compares to the risk from this radiation incident as Everest compares to the pile of salt I put on my eggs. Which pile of salt is also more dangerous than said radiation.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.