OT – Norway

[scaredyclassic]

[quote=walterwhite]not sure if this is true but i get this email from jewish people all the time:

Jewish Nobel Laureates: 11590% More Than Population Statistics Might Expect
By Scott Thong
1 Votes
Since its inception in 1895 till the last presentations in 2007, there have been 155 Nobel Prize laureates who are of Jewish lineage.

49 for the Nobel Prize in Medicine/Biomedical Sciences (out of 189 total winners, or 25.9%)
27 for the Nobel Prize in Chemistry (out of 150 total winners, or 18%)
23 for the Nobel Prize in Economics (out of 61 total winners, or 37.7% – yes, stereotypically Jewish money sense lol!)
44 for the Nobel Prize in Physics (out of 180 total winners, or 24.4%)
12 for the Nobel Prize in Literature (out of 104 total winners, or 11.5%)
Out of the total 684 Nobel laureates for the above categories, a full 22.66% of them have been of Jewish lineage.

An amazing list of achievements for a people who comprise just 0.1955% of the world population![/quote]

here was the expaned list…

The Contribution of the Jewish People:

0.2% OF WORLD’S POPULATION
14.1 Million Jews

NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS:

Literature

1910 – Paul Heyse
1927 – Henri Bergson
1958 – Boris Pasternak
1966 – Shmuel Yosef Agnon
1966 – Nelly Sachs
1976 – Saul Bellow
1978 – Isaac Bashevis Singer
1981 – Elias Canetti
1987 – Joseph Brodsky
1991 – Nadine Gordimer

World Peace

1911 – Alfred Fried
1911 – Tobias Michael Carel Asser
1968 – Rene Cassin
1973 – Henry Kissinger
1978 – Menachem Begin
1986 – Elie Wiesel
1994 – Shimon Peres
1994 – Yitzhak Rabin

Chemistry

1905 – Adolph Von Baeyer
1906 – Henri Moissan
1910 – Otto Wallach
1915 – Richard Willstaetter
1918 – Fritz Haber
1943 – George Charles de Hevesy
1961 – Melvin Calvin
1962 – Max Ferdinand Perutz
1972 – William Howard Stein
1977 – Ilya Prigogine
1979 – Herbert Charles Brown
1980 – Paul Berg
1980 – Walter Gilbert
1981 – Roald Hoffmann
1982 – Aaron Klug
1985 – Albert A. Hauptman
1985 – Jerome Karle
1986 – Dudley R. Herschbach
1988 – Robert Huber
1989 – Sidney Altman
1992 – Rudolph Marcus
2000 – Alan J. Heeger

Economics

1970 – Paul Anthony Samuelson
1971 – Simon Kuznets
1972 – Kenneth Joseph Arrow
1975 – Leonid Kantorovich
1976 – Milton Friedman
1978 – Herbert A. Simon
1980 – Lawrence Robert Klein
1985 – Franco Modigliani
1987 – Robert M. Solow
1990 – Harry Markowitz
1990 – Merton Miller
1992 – Gary Becker
1993 – Rober Fogel

Medicine

1908 – Elie Metchnikoff
1908 – Paul Erlich
1914 – Robert Barany
1922 – Otto Meyerhof
1930 – Karl Landsteiner
1931 – Otto Warburg
1936 – Otto Loewi
1944 – Joseph Erlanger
1944 – Herbert Spencer Gasser
1945 – Ernst Boris Chain
1946 – Hermann Joseph Muller
1950 – Tadeus Reichstein
1952 – Selman Abraham Waksman
1953 – Hans Krebs
1953 – Fritz Albert Lipmann
1958 – Joshua Lederberg
1959 – Arthur Kornberg
1964 – Konrad Bloch
1965 – Francois Jacob
1965 – Andre Lwoff
1967 – George Wald
1968 – Marshall W. Nirenberg
1969 – Salvador Luria
1970 – Julius Axelrod
1970 – Sir Bernard Katz
1972 – Gerald Maurice Edelman
1975 – David Baltimore
1975 – Howard Martin Temin
1976 – Baruch S. Blumberg
1977 – Rosalyn Sussman Yalow
1978 – Daniel Nathans
1980 – Baruj Benacerraf
1984 – Cesar Milstein
1985 – Michael Stuart Brown
1985 – Joseph L. Goldstein
1986 – Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini]
1988 – Gertrude Elion
1989 – Harold Varmus
1991 – Erwin Neher
1991 – Bert Sakmann
1993 – Richard J. Roberts
1993 – Phillip Sharp
1994 – Alfred Gilman
1995 – Edward B. Lewis

Physics

1907 – Albert Abraham Michelson
1908 – Gabriel Lippmann
1921 – Albert Einstein
1922 – Niels Bohr
1925 – James Franck
1925 – Gustav Hertz
1943 – Gustav Stern
1944 – Isidor Issac Rabi
1952 – Felix Bloch
1954 – Max Born
1958 – Igor Tamm
1959 – Emilio Segre
1960 – Donald A. Glaser
1961 – Robert Hofstadter
1962 – Lev Davidovich Landau
1965 – Richard Phillips Feynman
1965 – Julian Schwinger
1969 – Murray Gell-Mann
1971 – Dennis Gabor
1973 – Brian David Josephson
1975 – Benjamin Mottleson
1976 – Burton Richter
1978 – Arno Allan Penzias
1978 – Peter L. Kapitza
1979 – Stephen Weinberg
1979 – Sheldon Glashow
1988 – Leon Lederman
1988 – Melvin Schwartz
1988 – Jack Steinberger
1990 – Jerome Friedman
1995 – Martin Perl

[ocrenter]

[quote=walterwhite]i believe in my heart that the healthiest thing is lots of interbreeding, going far afield to mix your dna. i know this sounds kind of cold, but it seems better for producing dogs, so why not people?

[/quote]

interbreeding will certainly produce stronger and healthier population. we can see in dogs that a lot of “pure bred” breeds have intrinsic issues with health. for example, a lot of dalmatians are deaf and skin issues very prevalent. bull dogs suffer from respiratory problems. these are all human created problems by selectively inbreeding within a small population to get a breed, which lead to high prevalence of these conditions.

we can see the same for humans as well. the royals of Europe really messed themselves up by inbreeding with each other, resulting in high degree of hemophilia. the ashkenazi jews have the same problem with a whole host of genetic problems like tay sach and cystic fibrosis. one can say the same about blacks. by breeding with another african american, the risk of sickle cell is that much higher.

we definitely see physical advantages with interbreeding. now IQ? we can probably infer that as well, although that topic is filled with landmines…

[ocrenter]

[quote=walterwhite]i believe in my heart that the healthiest thing is lots of interbreeding, going far afield to mix your dna. i know this sounds kind of cold, but it seems better for producing dogs, so why not people?

[/quote]

interbreeding will certainly produce stronger and healthier population. we can see in dogs that a lot of “pure bred” breeds have intrinsic issues with health. for example, a lot of dalmatians are deaf and skin issues very prevalent. bull dogs suffer from respiratory problems. these are all human created problems by selectively inbreeding within a small population to get a breed, which lead to high prevalence of these conditions.

we can see the same for humans as well. the royals of Europe really messed themselves up by inbreeding with each other, resulting in high degree of hemophilia. the ashkenazi jews have the same problem with a whole host of genetic problems like tay sach and cystic fibrosis. one can say the same about blacks. by breeding with another african american, the risk of sickle cell is that much higher.

we definitely see physical advantages with interbreeding. now IQ? we can probably infer that as well, although that topic is filled with landmines…

[ocrenter]

[quote=walterwhite]i believe in my heart that the healthiest thing is lots of interbreeding, going far afield to mix your dna. i know this sounds kind of cold, but it seems better for producing dogs, so why not people?

[/quote]

interbreeding will certainly produce stronger and healthier population. we can see in dogs that a lot of “pure bred” breeds have intrinsic issues with health. for example, a lot of dalmatians are deaf and skin issues very prevalent. bull dogs suffer from respiratory problems. these are all human created problems by selectively inbreeding within a small population to get a breed, which lead to high prevalence of these conditions.

we can see the same for humans as well. the royals of Europe really messed themselves up by inbreeding with each other, resulting in high degree of hemophilia. the ashkenazi jews have the same problem with a whole host of genetic problems like tay sach and cystic fibrosis. one can say the same about blacks. by breeding with another african american, the risk of sickle cell is that much higher.

we definitely see physical advantages with interbreeding. now IQ? we can probably infer that as well, although that topic is filled with landmines…

[ocrenter]

[quote=walterwhite]i believe in my heart that the healthiest thing is lots of interbreeding, going far afield to mix your dna. i know this sounds kind of cold, but it seems better for producing dogs, so why not people?

[/quote]

interbreeding will certainly produce stronger and healthier population. we can see in dogs that a lot of “pure bred” breeds have intrinsic issues with health. for example, a lot of dalmatians are deaf and skin issues very prevalent. bull dogs suffer from respiratory problems. these are all human created problems by selectively inbreeding within a small population to get a breed, which lead to high prevalence of these conditions.

we can see the same for humans as well. the royals of Europe really messed themselves up by inbreeding with each other, resulting in high degree of hemophilia. the ashkenazi jews have the same problem with a whole host of genetic problems like tay sach and cystic fibrosis. one can say the same about blacks. by breeding with another african american, the risk of sickle cell is that much higher.

we definitely see physical advantages with interbreeding. now IQ? we can probably infer that as well, although that topic is filled with landmines…

[ocrenter]

[quote=walterwhite]i believe in my heart that the healthiest thing is lots of interbreeding, going far afield to mix your dna. i know this sounds kind of cold, but it seems better for producing dogs, so why not people?

[/quote]

interbreeding will certainly produce stronger and healthier population. we can see in dogs that a lot of “pure bred” breeds have intrinsic issues with health. for example, a lot of dalmatians are deaf and skin issues very prevalent. bull dogs suffer from respiratory problems. these are all human created problems by selectively inbreeding within a small population to get a breed, which lead to high prevalence of these conditions.

we can see the same for humans as well. the royals of Europe really messed themselves up by inbreeding with each other, resulting in high degree of hemophilia. the ashkenazi jews have the same problem with a whole host of genetic problems like tay sach and cystic fibrosis. one can say the same about blacks. by breeding with another african american, the risk of sickle cell is that much higher.

we definitely see physical advantages with interbreeding. now IQ? we can probably infer that as well, although that topic is filled with landmines…

[briansd1]

It also interesting that most Jews vote for Democrats. Jews are arguably the wealthiest population in America.

It’s also interesting that Mormons vote for Republicans. The church is wealthy, the Mormon people not so much.

Japanese-Americans, another wealthy subset of the population, tend to vote for Democrats. Chinese-Americans also lean democratic.

Vietnamese-Americans, a poorer subset of the Asian-American population vote Republican.

In the deep South (as opposed to the peripheral south), poor Christians vote Republican.

[briansd1]

It also interesting that most Jews vote for Democrats. Jews are arguably the wealthiest population in America.

It’s also interesting that Mormons vote for Republicans. The church is wealthy, the Mormon people not so much.

Japanese-Americans, another wealthy subset of the population, tend to vote for Democrats. Chinese-Americans also lean democratic.

Vietnamese-Americans, a poorer subset of the Asian-American population vote Republican.

In the deep South (as opposed to the peripheral south), poor Christians vote Republican.

[briansd1]

It also interesting that most Jews vote for Democrats. Jews are arguably the wealthiest population in America.

It’s also interesting that Mormons vote for Republicans. The church is wealthy, the Mormon people not so much.

Japanese-Americans, another wealthy subset of the population, tend to vote for Democrats. Chinese-Americans also lean democratic.

Vietnamese-Americans, a poorer subset of the Asian-American population vote Republican.

In the deep South (as opposed to the peripheral south), poor Christians vote Republican.

[briansd1]

It also interesting that most Jews vote for Democrats. Jews are arguably the wealthiest population in America.

It’s also interesting that Mormons vote for Republicans. The church is wealthy, the Mormon people not so much.

Japanese-Americans, another wealthy subset of the population, tend to vote for Democrats. Chinese-Americans also lean democratic.

Vietnamese-Americans, a poorer subset of the Asian-American population vote Republican.

In the deep South (as opposed to the peripheral south), poor Christians vote Republican.

[briansd1]

It also interesting that most Jews vote for Democrats. Jews are arguably the wealthiest population in America.

It’s also interesting that Mormons vote for Republicans. The church is wealthy, the Mormon people not so much.

Japanese-Americans, another wealthy subset of the population, tend to vote for Democrats. Chinese-Americans also lean democratic.

Vietnamese-Americans, a poorer subset of the Asian-American population vote Republican.

In the deep South (as opposed to the peripheral south), poor Christians vote Republican.

[Ren]

[quote=ocrenter]interbreeding will certainly produce stronger and healthier population.[/quote]

…and frequently better looking. I find that the most attractive women are usually a mix of two very different ethnicities – enough white so the instinct for my own tribe’s features kicks in, but something else to make things exotic and interesting. Caucasian/any Asian and Caucasian/any Hispanic are especially hot.

[Ren]

[quote=ocrenter]interbreeding will certainly produce stronger and healthier population.[/quote]

…and frequently better looking. I find that the most attractive women are usually a mix of two very different ethnicities – enough white so the instinct for my own tribe’s features kicks in, but something else to make things exotic and interesting. Caucasian/any Asian and Caucasian/any Hispanic are especially hot.

[Ren]

[quote=ocrenter]interbreeding will certainly produce stronger and healthier population.[/quote]

…and frequently better looking. I find that the most attractive women are usually a mix of two very different ethnicities – enough white so the instinct for my own tribe’s features kicks in, but something else to make things exotic and interesting. Caucasian/any Asian and Caucasian/any Hispanic are especially hot.

[Ren]

[quote=ocrenter]interbreeding will certainly produce stronger and healthier population.[/quote]

…and frequently better looking. I find that the most attractive women are usually a mix of two very different ethnicities – enough white so the instinct for my own tribe’s features kicks in, but something else to make things exotic and interesting. Caucasian/any Asian and Caucasian/any Hispanic are especially hot.

[Author]

Posts