- This topic has 245 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 3 months ago by jficquette.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 10, 2010 at 5:38 PM #590000August 10, 2010 at 6:46 PM #588957zkParticipant
Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be.
This test was discussed briefly on another topic, and three or four people revealed their profiles. I still think it would be interesting to hear from more of the posters here what profile they are.
August 10, 2010 at 6:46 PM #589051zkParticipantWell, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be.
This test was discussed briefly on another topic, and three or four people revealed their profiles. I still think it would be interesting to hear from more of the posters here what profile they are.
August 10, 2010 at 6:46 PM #589587zkParticipantWell, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be.
This test was discussed briefly on another topic, and three or four people revealed their profiles. I still think it would be interesting to hear from more of the posters here what profile they are.
August 10, 2010 at 6:46 PM #589696zkParticipantWell, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be.
This test was discussed briefly on another topic, and three or four people revealed their profiles. I still think it would be interesting to hear from more of the posters here what profile they are.
August 10, 2010 at 6:46 PM #590005zkParticipantWell, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be.
This test was discussed briefly on another topic, and three or four people revealed their profiles. I still think it would be interesting to hear from more of the posters here what profile they are.
August 10, 2010 at 7:25 PM #588967bearishgurlParticipant[quote=zk]Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be. [/quote]
zk, it IS amazing that the descriptions of personality types are so accurate! I’m not “happy” being “diagnosed” what I am either but I’ve always been anal-retentive and don’t know how to fix this so should probably make the best of it – lol :={
August 10, 2010 at 7:25 PM #589061bearishgurlParticipant[quote=zk]Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be. [/quote]
zk, it IS amazing that the descriptions of personality types are so accurate! I’m not “happy” being “diagnosed” what I am either but I’ve always been anal-retentive and don’t know how to fix this so should probably make the best of it – lol :={
August 10, 2010 at 7:25 PM #589597bearishgurlParticipant[quote=zk]Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be. [/quote]
zk, it IS amazing that the descriptions of personality types are so accurate! I’m not “happy” being “diagnosed” what I am either but I’ve always been anal-retentive and don’t know how to fix this so should probably make the best of it – lol :={
August 10, 2010 at 7:25 PM #589706bearishgurlParticipant[quote=zk]Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be. [/quote]
zk, it IS amazing that the descriptions of personality types are so accurate! I’m not “happy” being “diagnosed” what I am either but I’ve always been anal-retentive and don’t know how to fix this so should probably make the best of it – lol :={
August 10, 2010 at 7:25 PM #590015bearishgurlParticipant[quote=zk]Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be. [/quote]
zk, it IS amazing that the descriptions of personality types are so accurate! I’m not “happy” being “diagnosed” what I am either but I’ve always been anal-retentive and don’t know how to fix this so should probably make the best of it – lol :={
August 10, 2010 at 7:42 PM #588972desmondParticipant[quote=zk]Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be.
This test was discussed briefly on another topic, and three or four people revealed their profiles. I still think it would be interesting to hear from more of the posters here what profile they are.[/quote]
ok, then your just stunned that your “the thinker”
Like Meryl Streep:
http://www.hulu.com/watch/121068/saturday-night-live-update-meryl-streepAugust 10, 2010 at 7:42 PM #589066desmondParticipant[quote=zk]Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be.
This test was discussed briefly on another topic, and three or four people revealed their profiles. I still think it would be interesting to hear from more of the posters here what profile they are.[/quote]
ok, then your just stunned that your “the thinker”
Like Meryl Streep:
http://www.hulu.com/watch/121068/saturday-night-live-update-meryl-streepAugust 10, 2010 at 7:42 PM #589602desmondParticipant[quote=zk]Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be.
This test was discussed briefly on another topic, and three or four people revealed their profiles. I still think it would be interesting to hear from more of the posters here what profile they are.[/quote]
ok, then your just stunned that your “the thinker”
Like Meryl Streep:
http://www.hulu.com/watch/121068/saturday-night-live-update-meryl-streepAugust 10, 2010 at 7:42 PM #589711desmondParticipant[quote=zk]Well, first of all, “happy that he was ‘the thinker'” is totally incorrect. What I said was that I was amazed that it was so accurate and detailed a description. There are a dozen other types that I think I’d be somewhat happier to be.
This test was discussed briefly on another topic, and three or four people revealed their profiles. I still think it would be interesting to hear from more of the posters here what profile they are.[/quote]
ok, then your just stunned that your “the thinker”
Like Meryl Streep:
http://www.hulu.com/watch/121068/saturday-night-live-update-meryl-streep -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.