OT: More wacky school admin

[Coronita]

[quote=briansd1]I can see that girl turn into a 200-pound woman. 20 years from now, she’ll be on Oprah (or whoever at that time) telling us about her food ordeal.

I was at Costco today I couldn’t believe number of fat people out there.

Conservatives should be condemning irresponsible eating behavior because we are all paying dearly for it.[/quote]

Dude, it was one piece of candy. What makes you think she’ll turn into 200 pounds. Why not while we’re at it ban Halloween, or put a candy fat tax on it? I still don’t get how you can claim to be a liberal and yet think it’s ok for government to reach into people’s lives.

BTW: obesity knows no parties. Some of the most obese people are Democrat slobs.

1)Michael Moore
2)Clinton is always seen pigging out at a public place
3)Al Gore’s balloon episode.

[Coronita]

[quote=meadandale][quote=briansd1][quote=scaredycat]bad food is way more dangerous than drugs. as long as we’re gonna nanny the people ond rugs, we might as well nanny em on crap food.[/quote]

Yes. Or legalize drugs and let the buyers beware.[/quote]

On the one hand you advocate RELAXING the government control of things (pot) and promoting personal responsibility/accountability and on the other hand you think that it is perfectly allowable for the government to control what you are allowed to eat–in this case sugar for your own good.

Make up your freaking mind.

I’ve noticed time and time again this entire lack of consistency in your world view.[/quote]

Isn’t it obvious..

Candy=>make people unattractive= bad
Dope and drugs=> make people do wild things and have fun = good

[Coronita]

[quote=meadandale][quote=briansd1][quote=scaredycat]bad food is way more dangerous than drugs. as long as we’re gonna nanny the people ond rugs, we might as well nanny em on crap food.[/quote]

Yes. Or legalize drugs and let the buyers beware.[/quote]

On the one hand you advocate RELAXING the government control of things (pot) and promoting personal responsibility/accountability and on the other hand you think that it is perfectly allowable for the government to control what you are allowed to eat–in this case sugar for your own good.

Make up your freaking mind.

I’ve noticed time and time again this entire lack of consistency in your world view.[/quote]

Isn’t it obvious..

Candy=>make people unattractive= bad
Dope and drugs=> make people do wild things and have fun = good

[Coronita]

[quote=meadandale][quote=briansd1][quote=scaredycat]bad food is way more dangerous than drugs. as long as we’re gonna nanny the people ond rugs, we might as well nanny em on crap food.[/quote]

Yes. Or legalize drugs and let the buyers beware.[/quote]

On the one hand you advocate RELAXING the government control of things (pot) and promoting personal responsibility/accountability and on the other hand you think that it is perfectly allowable for the government to control what you are allowed to eat–in this case sugar for your own good.

Make up your freaking mind.

I’ve noticed time and time again this entire lack of consistency in your world view.[/quote]

Isn’t it obvious..

Candy=>make people unattractive= bad
Dope and drugs=> make people do wild things and have fun = good

[Coronita]

[quote=meadandale][quote=briansd1][quote=scaredycat]bad food is way more dangerous than drugs. as long as we’re gonna nanny the people ond rugs, we might as well nanny em on crap food.[/quote]

Yes. Or legalize drugs and let the buyers beware.[/quote]

On the one hand you advocate RELAXING the government control of things (pot) and promoting personal responsibility/accountability and on the other hand you think that it is perfectly allowable for the government to control what you are allowed to eat–in this case sugar for your own good.

Make up your freaking mind.

I’ve noticed time and time again this entire lack of consistency in your world view.[/quote]

Isn’t it obvious..

Candy=>make people unattractive= bad
Dope and drugs=> make people do wild things and have fun = good

[Coronita]

[quote=meadandale][quote=briansd1][quote=scaredycat]bad food is way more dangerous than drugs. as long as we’re gonna nanny the people ond rugs, we might as well nanny em on crap food.[/quote]

Yes. Or legalize drugs and let the buyers beware.[/quote]

On the one hand you advocate RELAXING the government control of things (pot) and promoting personal responsibility/accountability and on the other hand you think that it is perfectly allowable for the government to control what you are allowed to eat–in this case sugar for your own good.

Make up your freaking mind.

I’ve noticed time and time again this entire lack of consistency in your world view.[/quote]

Isn’t it obvious..

Candy=>make people unattractive= bad
Dope and drugs=> make people do wild things and have fun = good

[Coronita]

[quote=AN][quote=briansd1][quote=AN]
You mean liberal should be condemning irresponsible eating behavior because they love to tell others what to do. [/quote]

I’d rather schools taught children not to eat junk food than schools forcing kids to learn about (un)intelligent design.

[quote=AN] Just don’t make me pay to prolong your life.[/quote]

Like we all paid to prolong Terri Schivo’s life?[/quote]
I rather schools teach children math, English, art, science, etc.[/quote]

Well, most public schools failed at that, so they are trying to do the next thing. Trying demonstrate authority.

This reminds me of some of the “teachers” I had growing up. I don’t know why there were teachers. Because they didn’t seem to be truely inspiring education. Some took joy out of writing demerits or screaming at students etc, and yet were protected from getting fired due to union rules, despite numerous protests from parents/students.

I remember in junior high 8th grade, there was an english/ss class with 50 students, for which two male teachers were teaching 50 students in one mega-class. Every year, the would seat all the girls up front and all the boys in the back. Finally, my year some of the suspicious girls caught on.. One of the girls sitting in front decides to wear a tank top to school, and down her shirt, slightly right above her bra she writes with a ballpoint pen “Fvck you [teacher name] for looking”, only visible if you were actually peering down the shirt. Well, during class, I heard one of the teachers starting to yell at her and sent her to the principal’s office, which she was happy to go, only for the other teach to send another student to intercept her to tell her she didn’t have to go because the teacher “changed his mind”. The girl ended up going to the principal’s office anyway, parents called, lot’s of steamy parents, and then suddenly the next day, all the chairs were re-arranged…Teachers still were there though, not fired, thanks to union rules.

[Coronita]

[quote=AN][quote=briansd1][quote=AN]
You mean liberal should be condemning irresponsible eating behavior because they love to tell others what to do. [/quote]

I’d rather schools taught children not to eat junk food than schools forcing kids to learn about (un)intelligent design.

[quote=AN] Just don’t make me pay to prolong your life.[/quote]

Like we all paid to prolong Terri Schivo’s life?[/quote]
I rather schools teach children math, English, art, science, etc.[/quote]

Well, most public schools failed at that, so they are trying to do the next thing. Trying demonstrate authority.

This reminds me of some of the “teachers” I had growing up. I don’t know why there were teachers. Because they didn’t seem to be truely inspiring education. Some took joy out of writing demerits or screaming at students etc, and yet were protected from getting fired due to union rules, despite numerous protests from parents/students.

I remember in junior high 8th grade, there was an english/ss class with 50 students, for which two male teachers were teaching 50 students in one mega-class. Every year, the would seat all the girls up front and all the boys in the back. Finally, my year some of the suspicious girls caught on.. One of the girls sitting in front decides to wear a tank top to school, and down her shirt, slightly right above her bra she writes with a ballpoint pen “Fvck you [teacher name] for looking”, only visible if you were actually peering down the shirt. Well, during class, I heard one of the teachers starting to yell at her and sent her to the principal’s office, which she was happy to go, only for the other teach to send another student to intercept her to tell her she didn’t have to go because the teacher “changed his mind”. The girl ended up going to the principal’s office anyway, parents called, lot’s of steamy parents, and then suddenly the next day, all the chairs were re-arranged…Teachers still were there though, not fired, thanks to union rules.

[Coronita]

[quote=AN][quote=briansd1][quote=AN]
You mean liberal should be condemning irresponsible eating behavior because they love to tell others what to do. [/quote]

I’d rather schools taught children not to eat junk food than schools forcing kids to learn about (un)intelligent design.

[quote=AN] Just don’t make me pay to prolong your life.[/quote]

Like we all paid to prolong Terri Schivo’s life?[/quote]
I rather schools teach children math, English, art, science, etc.[/quote]

Well, most public schools failed at that, so they are trying to do the next thing. Trying demonstrate authority.

This reminds me of some of the “teachers” I had growing up. I don’t know why there were teachers. Because they didn’t seem to be truely inspiring education. Some took joy out of writing demerits or screaming at students etc, and yet were protected from getting fired due to union rules, despite numerous protests from parents/students.

I remember in junior high 8th grade, there was an english/ss class with 50 students, for which two male teachers were teaching 50 students in one mega-class. Every year, the would seat all the girls up front and all the boys in the back. Finally, my year some of the suspicious girls caught on.. One of the girls sitting in front decides to wear a tank top to school, and down her shirt, slightly right above her bra she writes with a ballpoint pen “Fvck you [teacher name] for looking”, only visible if you were actually peering down the shirt. Well, during class, I heard one of the teachers starting to yell at her and sent her to the principal’s office, which she was happy to go, only for the other teach to send another student to intercept her to tell her she didn’t have to go because the teacher “changed his mind”. The girl ended up going to the principal’s office anyway, parents called, lot’s of steamy parents, and then suddenly the next day, all the chairs were re-arranged…Teachers still were there though, not fired, thanks to union rules.

[Coronita]

[quote=AN][quote=briansd1][quote=AN]
You mean liberal should be condemning irresponsible eating behavior because they love to tell others what to do. [/quote]

I’d rather schools taught children not to eat junk food than schools forcing kids to learn about (un)intelligent design.

[quote=AN] Just don’t make me pay to prolong your life.[/quote]

Like we all paid to prolong Terri Schivo’s life?[/quote]
I rather schools teach children math, English, art, science, etc.[/quote]

Well, most public schools failed at that, so they are trying to do the next thing. Trying demonstrate authority.

This reminds me of some of the “teachers” I had growing up. I don’t know why there were teachers. Because they didn’t seem to be truely inspiring education. Some took joy out of writing demerits or screaming at students etc, and yet were protected from getting fired due to union rules, despite numerous protests from parents/students.

I remember in junior high 8th grade, there was an english/ss class with 50 students, for which two male teachers were teaching 50 students in one mega-class. Every year, the would seat all the girls up front and all the boys in the back. Finally, my year some of the suspicious girls caught on.. One of the girls sitting in front decides to wear a tank top to school, and down her shirt, slightly right above her bra she writes with a ballpoint pen “Fvck you [teacher name] for looking”, only visible if you were actually peering down the shirt. Well, during class, I heard one of the teachers starting to yell at her and sent her to the principal’s office, which she was happy to go, only for the other teach to send another student to intercept her to tell her she didn’t have to go because the teacher “changed his mind”. The girl ended up going to the principal’s office anyway, parents called, lot’s of steamy parents, and then suddenly the next day, all the chairs were re-arranged…Teachers still were there though, not fired, thanks to union rules.

[Coronita]

[quote=AN][quote=briansd1][quote=AN]
You mean liberal should be condemning irresponsible eating behavior because they love to tell others what to do. [/quote]

I’d rather schools taught children not to eat junk food than schools forcing kids to learn about (un)intelligent design.

[quote=AN] Just don’t make me pay to prolong your life.[/quote]

Like we all paid to prolong Terri Schivo’s life?[/quote]
I rather schools teach children math, English, art, science, etc.[/quote]

Well, most public schools failed at that, so they are trying to do the next thing. Trying demonstrate authority.

This reminds me of some of the “teachers” I had growing up. I don’t know why there were teachers. Because they didn’t seem to be truely inspiring education. Some took joy out of writing demerits or screaming at students etc, and yet were protected from getting fired due to union rules, despite numerous protests from parents/students.

I remember in junior high 8th grade, there was an english/ss class with 50 students, for which two male teachers were teaching 50 students in one mega-class. Every year, the would seat all the girls up front and all the boys in the back. Finally, my year some of the suspicious girls caught on.. One of the girls sitting in front decides to wear a tank top to school, and down her shirt, slightly right above her bra she writes with a ballpoint pen “Fvck you [teacher name] for looking”, only visible if you were actually peering down the shirt. Well, during class, I heard one of the teachers starting to yell at her and sent her to the principal’s office, which she was happy to go, only for the other teach to send another student to intercept her to tell her she didn’t have to go because the teacher “changed his mind”. The girl ended up going to the principal’s office anyway, parents called, lot’s of steamy parents, and then suddenly the next day, all the chairs were re-arranged…Teachers still were there though, not fired, thanks to union rules.

[an]

Brian, is it safe to say you’re in great shape with no health issue? What’s your BMI? Mine is 20.5.

[an]

Brian, is it safe to say you’re in great shape with no health issue? What’s your BMI? Mine is 20.5.

[an]

Brian, is it safe to say you’re in great shape with no health issue? What’s your BMI? Mine is 20.5.

[an]

Brian, is it safe to say you’re in great shape with no health issue? What’s your BMI? Mine is 20.5.

[Author]

Posts