- This topic has 305 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 9, 2010 at 9:11 PM #549615May 9, 2010 at 9:21 PM #548647briansd1Guest
[quote=Arraya]
Please move quickly to your next shopping experience[/quote]I agree Arraya, our system needs us to consume and continue greasing the wheel of commerce. But it doesn’t need us to consume junk. If we can redirect the consumption to equivalent or greater value, but to healthier choices, we’ll all be better off.
May 9, 2010 at 9:21 PM #548759briansd1Guest[quote=Arraya]
Please move quickly to your next shopping experience[/quote]I agree Arraya, our system needs us to consume and continue greasing the wheel of commerce. But it doesn’t need us to consume junk. If we can redirect the consumption to equivalent or greater value, but to healthier choices, we’ll all be better off.
May 9, 2010 at 9:21 PM #549242briansd1Guest[quote=Arraya]
Please move quickly to your next shopping experience[/quote]I agree Arraya, our system needs us to consume and continue greasing the wheel of commerce. But it doesn’t need us to consume junk. If we can redirect the consumption to equivalent or greater value, but to healthier choices, we’ll all be better off.
May 9, 2010 at 9:21 PM #549343briansd1Guest[quote=Arraya]
Please move quickly to your next shopping experience[/quote]I agree Arraya, our system needs us to consume and continue greasing the wheel of commerce. But it doesn’t need us to consume junk. If we can redirect the consumption to equivalent or greater value, but to healthier choices, we’ll all be better off.
May 9, 2010 at 9:21 PM #549620briansd1Guest[quote=Arraya]
Please move quickly to your next shopping experience[/quote]I agree Arraya, our system needs us to consume and continue greasing the wheel of commerce. But it doesn’t need us to consume junk. If we can redirect the consumption to equivalent or greater value, but to healthier choices, we’ll all be better off.
May 9, 2010 at 10:47 PM #548692scaredyclassicParticipantalso, candy is bad for your teeth.
difficult for schools to take a principled stance on sweets when the school lunches are crap.
and of course it’s not going to make a rat’s ass bit of difference, as the kid can pig out right after school. so no worries, it’s justa slight delay.
May 9, 2010 at 10:47 PM #548804scaredyclassicParticipantalso, candy is bad for your teeth.
difficult for schools to take a principled stance on sweets when the school lunches are crap.
and of course it’s not going to make a rat’s ass bit of difference, as the kid can pig out right after school. so no worries, it’s justa slight delay.
May 9, 2010 at 10:47 PM #549289scaredyclassicParticipantalso, candy is bad for your teeth.
difficult for schools to take a principled stance on sweets when the school lunches are crap.
and of course it’s not going to make a rat’s ass bit of difference, as the kid can pig out right after school. so no worries, it’s justa slight delay.
May 9, 2010 at 10:47 PM #549388scaredyclassicParticipantalso, candy is bad for your teeth.
difficult for schools to take a principled stance on sweets when the school lunches are crap.
and of course it’s not going to make a rat’s ass bit of difference, as the kid can pig out right after school. so no worries, it’s justa slight delay.
May 9, 2010 at 10:47 PM #549666scaredyclassicParticipantalso, candy is bad for your teeth.
difficult for schools to take a principled stance on sweets when the school lunches are crap.
and of course it’s not going to make a rat’s ass bit of difference, as the kid can pig out right after school. so no worries, it’s justa slight delay.
May 9, 2010 at 11:53 PM #548712ucodegenParticipantI can see that girl turn into a 200-pound woman. 20 years from now, she’ll be on Oprah (or whoever at that time) telling us about her food ordeal.
Either that or she will turn into a 70lb woman with anorexia nervosa – which is an eating disorder, often caused by excessive control on what a person eats and how much they weigh.
May 9, 2010 at 11:53 PM #548823ucodegenParticipantI can see that girl turn into a 200-pound woman. 20 years from now, she’ll be on Oprah (or whoever at that time) telling us about her food ordeal.
Either that or she will turn into a 70lb woman with anorexia nervosa – which is an eating disorder, often caused by excessive control on what a person eats and how much they weigh.
May 9, 2010 at 11:53 PM #549309ucodegenParticipantI can see that girl turn into a 200-pound woman. 20 years from now, she’ll be on Oprah (or whoever at that time) telling us about her food ordeal.
Either that or she will turn into a 70lb woman with anorexia nervosa – which is an eating disorder, often caused by excessive control on what a person eats and how much they weigh.
May 9, 2010 at 11:53 PM #549409ucodegenParticipantI can see that girl turn into a 200-pound woman. 20 years from now, she’ll be on Oprah (or whoever at that time) telling us about her food ordeal.
Either that or she will turn into a 70lb woman with anorexia nervosa – which is an eating disorder, often caused by excessive control on what a person eats and how much they weigh.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.