- This topic has 290 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 10, 2008 at 4:48 PM #151393February 10, 2008 at 4:58 PM #151046Allan from FallbrookParticipant
marion: Well, given my high school days, I am all FOR birth control! Kidding aside, I am for birth control. I think a lot of issues the world over could be better handled in conjunction with an easily accessible contraception program, and one that works with targeted education about hygiene, child care and disease prevention. I know that puts me squarely at odds with the Mother Church on the subject, but so be it. On certain issues, the Catholic Church needs to come out of the Middle Ages (or Dark Ages, as the case may be).
And, yeah, the Jesuit in me has a real problem with the death penalty. Nothing better than state sponsored murder, in my opinion.
February 10, 2008 at 4:58 PM #151306Allan from FallbrookParticipantmarion: Well, given my high school days, I am all FOR birth control! Kidding aside, I am for birth control. I think a lot of issues the world over could be better handled in conjunction with an easily accessible contraception program, and one that works with targeted education about hygiene, child care and disease prevention. I know that puts me squarely at odds with the Mother Church on the subject, but so be it. On certain issues, the Catholic Church needs to come out of the Middle Ages (or Dark Ages, as the case may be).
And, yeah, the Jesuit in me has a real problem with the death penalty. Nothing better than state sponsored murder, in my opinion.
February 10, 2008 at 4:58 PM #151314Allan from FallbrookParticipantmarion: Well, given my high school days, I am all FOR birth control! Kidding aside, I am for birth control. I think a lot of issues the world over could be better handled in conjunction with an easily accessible contraception program, and one that works with targeted education about hygiene, child care and disease prevention. I know that puts me squarely at odds with the Mother Church on the subject, but so be it. On certain issues, the Catholic Church needs to come out of the Middle Ages (or Dark Ages, as the case may be).
And, yeah, the Jesuit in me has a real problem with the death penalty. Nothing better than state sponsored murder, in my opinion.
February 10, 2008 at 4:58 PM #151332Allan from FallbrookParticipantmarion: Well, given my high school days, I am all FOR birth control! Kidding aside, I am for birth control. I think a lot of issues the world over could be better handled in conjunction with an easily accessible contraception program, and one that works with targeted education about hygiene, child care and disease prevention. I know that puts me squarely at odds with the Mother Church on the subject, but so be it. On certain issues, the Catholic Church needs to come out of the Middle Ages (or Dark Ages, as the case may be).
And, yeah, the Jesuit in me has a real problem with the death penalty. Nothing better than state sponsored murder, in my opinion.
February 10, 2008 at 4:58 PM #151403Allan from FallbrookParticipantmarion: Well, given my high school days, I am all FOR birth control! Kidding aside, I am for birth control. I think a lot of issues the world over could be better handled in conjunction with an easily accessible contraception program, and one that works with targeted education about hygiene, child care and disease prevention. I know that puts me squarely at odds with the Mother Church on the subject, but so be it. On certain issues, the Catholic Church needs to come out of the Middle Ages (or Dark Ages, as the case may be).
And, yeah, the Jesuit in me has a real problem with the death penalty. Nothing better than state sponsored murder, in my opinion.
February 10, 2008 at 5:04 PM #151051gandalfParticipantAppreciate the thoughtful remarks. With Eisenhower, I admire his presidency because he presided over a time of general peace and prosperity where nothing happened. While he gets credit for being a good president, he is often overlooked as one of the greats in part because nothing really happened on his watch. Conservatives of all people appreciate what a work of greatness it is to be president of a government where nothing happens, where the list of accomplishments flowing forth from DC is overshadowed by the general peace and prosperity of the nation.
While every president receives too much credit for what happens with the economy on their watch, Eisenhower receives too little credit for his brilliant vision, for guiding the country and its foreign relations towards reasonably successful, bipartisan and uneventful outcomes during his years. His career was full of examples of this kind of quiet effective leadership, but the most significant was clearly ‘managing’ the war, mustering all of the resources and personalities required to win it. To my mind, there have been a few presidents that governed in the model of George Washington. Eisenhower was one of them.
Susan Eisenhower, Ike’s granddaughter, wrote an Op-Ed in the Washington Post last week endorsing Obama. She’s a life-long member of the Republican Party who is crossing lines to support Obama. She sees the same things we do. Time to turn the page.
February 10, 2008 at 5:04 PM #151311gandalfParticipantAppreciate the thoughtful remarks. With Eisenhower, I admire his presidency because he presided over a time of general peace and prosperity where nothing happened. While he gets credit for being a good president, he is often overlooked as one of the greats in part because nothing really happened on his watch. Conservatives of all people appreciate what a work of greatness it is to be president of a government where nothing happens, where the list of accomplishments flowing forth from DC is overshadowed by the general peace and prosperity of the nation.
While every president receives too much credit for what happens with the economy on their watch, Eisenhower receives too little credit for his brilliant vision, for guiding the country and its foreign relations towards reasonably successful, bipartisan and uneventful outcomes during his years. His career was full of examples of this kind of quiet effective leadership, but the most significant was clearly ‘managing’ the war, mustering all of the resources and personalities required to win it. To my mind, there have been a few presidents that governed in the model of George Washington. Eisenhower was one of them.
Susan Eisenhower, Ike’s granddaughter, wrote an Op-Ed in the Washington Post last week endorsing Obama. She’s a life-long member of the Republican Party who is crossing lines to support Obama. She sees the same things we do. Time to turn the page.
February 10, 2008 at 5:04 PM #151319gandalfParticipantAppreciate the thoughtful remarks. With Eisenhower, I admire his presidency because he presided over a time of general peace and prosperity where nothing happened. While he gets credit for being a good president, he is often overlooked as one of the greats in part because nothing really happened on his watch. Conservatives of all people appreciate what a work of greatness it is to be president of a government where nothing happens, where the list of accomplishments flowing forth from DC is overshadowed by the general peace and prosperity of the nation.
While every president receives too much credit for what happens with the economy on their watch, Eisenhower receives too little credit for his brilliant vision, for guiding the country and its foreign relations towards reasonably successful, bipartisan and uneventful outcomes during his years. His career was full of examples of this kind of quiet effective leadership, but the most significant was clearly ‘managing’ the war, mustering all of the resources and personalities required to win it. To my mind, there have been a few presidents that governed in the model of George Washington. Eisenhower was one of them.
Susan Eisenhower, Ike’s granddaughter, wrote an Op-Ed in the Washington Post last week endorsing Obama. She’s a life-long member of the Republican Party who is crossing lines to support Obama. She sees the same things we do. Time to turn the page.
February 10, 2008 at 5:04 PM #151337gandalfParticipantAppreciate the thoughtful remarks. With Eisenhower, I admire his presidency because he presided over a time of general peace and prosperity where nothing happened. While he gets credit for being a good president, he is often overlooked as one of the greats in part because nothing really happened on his watch. Conservatives of all people appreciate what a work of greatness it is to be president of a government where nothing happens, where the list of accomplishments flowing forth from DC is overshadowed by the general peace and prosperity of the nation.
While every president receives too much credit for what happens with the economy on their watch, Eisenhower receives too little credit for his brilliant vision, for guiding the country and its foreign relations towards reasonably successful, bipartisan and uneventful outcomes during his years. His career was full of examples of this kind of quiet effective leadership, but the most significant was clearly ‘managing’ the war, mustering all of the resources and personalities required to win it. To my mind, there have been a few presidents that governed in the model of George Washington. Eisenhower was one of them.
Susan Eisenhower, Ike’s granddaughter, wrote an Op-Ed in the Washington Post last week endorsing Obama. She’s a life-long member of the Republican Party who is crossing lines to support Obama. She sees the same things we do. Time to turn the page.
February 10, 2008 at 5:04 PM #151408gandalfParticipantAppreciate the thoughtful remarks. With Eisenhower, I admire his presidency because he presided over a time of general peace and prosperity where nothing happened. While he gets credit for being a good president, he is often overlooked as one of the greats in part because nothing really happened on his watch. Conservatives of all people appreciate what a work of greatness it is to be president of a government where nothing happens, where the list of accomplishments flowing forth from DC is overshadowed by the general peace and prosperity of the nation.
While every president receives too much credit for what happens with the economy on their watch, Eisenhower receives too little credit for his brilliant vision, for guiding the country and its foreign relations towards reasonably successful, bipartisan and uneventful outcomes during his years. His career was full of examples of this kind of quiet effective leadership, but the most significant was clearly ‘managing’ the war, mustering all of the resources and personalities required to win it. To my mind, there have been a few presidents that governed in the model of George Washington. Eisenhower was one of them.
Susan Eisenhower, Ike’s granddaughter, wrote an Op-Ed in the Washington Post last week endorsing Obama. She’s a life-long member of the Republican Party who is crossing lines to support Obama. She sees the same things we do. Time to turn the page.
February 10, 2008 at 5:05 PM #151057AnonymousGuestGiven your position on abortion, I knew what your choice would likely be on birth control. Of course, the reason I brought it up is that your church is against it. I wonder how firmly “into” Catholism you are. Do you dutifully attend mass every week?
February 10, 2008 at 5:05 PM #151316AnonymousGuestGiven your position on abortion, I knew what your choice would likely be on birth control. Of course, the reason I brought it up is that your church is against it. I wonder how firmly “into” Catholism you are. Do you dutifully attend mass every week?
February 10, 2008 at 5:05 PM #151324AnonymousGuestGiven your position on abortion, I knew what your choice would likely be on birth control. Of course, the reason I brought it up is that your church is against it. I wonder how firmly “into” Catholism you are. Do you dutifully attend mass every week?
February 10, 2008 at 5:05 PM #151342AnonymousGuestGiven your position on abortion, I knew what your choice would likely be on birth control. Of course, the reason I brought it up is that your church is against it. I wonder how firmly “into” Catholism you are. Do you dutifully attend mass every week?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.