- This topic has 495 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by equalizer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 3, 2008 at 8:26 PM #298196November 3, 2008 at 9:08 PM #297798jficquetteParticipant
Partypup,
I don’t think McCain is senile. I say that because the sense of humor is the first thing to go when senility hits and McCain has a great wit. He was very funny imitating Barbara Streisand and was funny on SNL the other nite. Maybe you did not really meant senile in the clincal sense.
He seems to have a ton of energy and showed during the debates that he is very clever and is good at finding weaknesses in his oppenent.
72 is not that old anymore. Maybe that’s because I am already 54 LOL.
Plus, his daughter claims he likes 9 inch nails (g).
John
November 3, 2008 at 9:08 PM #298147jficquetteParticipantPartypup,
I don’t think McCain is senile. I say that because the sense of humor is the first thing to go when senility hits and McCain has a great wit. He was very funny imitating Barbara Streisand and was funny on SNL the other nite. Maybe you did not really meant senile in the clincal sense.
He seems to have a ton of energy and showed during the debates that he is very clever and is good at finding weaknesses in his oppenent.
72 is not that old anymore. Maybe that’s because I am already 54 LOL.
Plus, his daughter claims he likes 9 inch nails (g).
John
November 3, 2008 at 9:08 PM #298160jficquetteParticipantPartypup,
I don’t think McCain is senile. I say that because the sense of humor is the first thing to go when senility hits and McCain has a great wit. He was very funny imitating Barbara Streisand and was funny on SNL the other nite. Maybe you did not really meant senile in the clincal sense.
He seems to have a ton of energy and showed during the debates that he is very clever and is good at finding weaknesses in his oppenent.
72 is not that old anymore. Maybe that’s because I am already 54 LOL.
Plus, his daughter claims he likes 9 inch nails (g).
John
November 3, 2008 at 9:08 PM #298174jficquetteParticipantPartypup,
I don’t think McCain is senile. I say that because the sense of humor is the first thing to go when senility hits and McCain has a great wit. He was very funny imitating Barbara Streisand and was funny on SNL the other nite. Maybe you did not really meant senile in the clincal sense.
He seems to have a ton of energy and showed during the debates that he is very clever and is good at finding weaknesses in his oppenent.
72 is not that old anymore. Maybe that’s because I am already 54 LOL.
Plus, his daughter claims he likes 9 inch nails (g).
John
November 3, 2008 at 9:08 PM #298221jficquetteParticipantPartypup,
I don’t think McCain is senile. I say that because the sense of humor is the first thing to go when senility hits and McCain has a great wit. He was very funny imitating Barbara Streisand and was funny on SNL the other nite. Maybe you did not really meant senile in the clincal sense.
He seems to have a ton of energy and showed during the debates that he is very clever and is good at finding weaknesses in his oppenent.
72 is not that old anymore. Maybe that’s because I am already 54 LOL.
Plus, his daughter claims he likes 9 inch nails (g).
John
November 3, 2008 at 9:48 PM #297843equalizerParticipantpartyup,
Very perceptive about the robotic comments. How bout “I’ll use my law degree to help out my aunt?”
What has he learned from Rove, toss everyone under the bus?November 3, 2008 at 9:48 PM #298192equalizerParticipantpartyup,
Very perceptive about the robotic comments. How bout “I’ll use my law degree to help out my aunt?”
What has he learned from Rove, toss everyone under the bus?November 3, 2008 at 9:48 PM #298205equalizerParticipantpartyup,
Very perceptive about the robotic comments. How bout “I’ll use my law degree to help out my aunt?”
What has he learned from Rove, toss everyone under the bus?November 3, 2008 at 9:48 PM #298219equalizerParticipantpartyup,
Very perceptive about the robotic comments. How bout “I’ll use my law degree to help out my aunt?”
What has he learned from Rove, toss everyone under the bus?November 3, 2008 at 9:48 PM #298266equalizerParticipantpartyup,
Very perceptive about the robotic comments. How bout “I’ll use my law degree to help out my aunt?”
What has he learned from Rove, toss everyone under the bus?November 3, 2008 at 10:46 PM #297884CardiffBaseballParticipantPartypup I too am fascinated by the whole PUMA thing and little it’s been covered. One of the sites actually had people donating last minute funds to run anti-messiah ads in swing states.
Very good analysis here, and I think you are correct the tightening is occuring. Also you shed on a topic I hadn’t given much thought to, and that is the massive Hillary turnout when the race was considered all but over. Why would so many waste their time? I understand a few hardcore types doing it, but pulling upset wins?
I guarantee you if for some reason O loses, he is done with national politics. Weren’t there a couple of media types questioning at the time why Hillary won some of the last couple of primaries? They never really did go into it much or I should give us any depth on the topic. It’s been a big lovefest since the nomination but very little in the way of tough questions.
If I know the media like I think I do, they’ll start to grill him some from tomorrow until the inauguration. At some point he’ll have to take some stands that will either show him to the center-right like William Jefferson (Dick Morris years), or where I think he’ll govern from… the left. Remember he has to answer to the Howard Dean/Pelosi/Reid contingency who helped “steal this from Hillary” according to the PUMAs. He’ll have majorities in Congress, and the mandate will be said to govern from the left.
November 3, 2008 at 10:46 PM #298232CardiffBaseballParticipantPartypup I too am fascinated by the whole PUMA thing and little it’s been covered. One of the sites actually had people donating last minute funds to run anti-messiah ads in swing states.
Very good analysis here, and I think you are correct the tightening is occuring. Also you shed on a topic I hadn’t given much thought to, and that is the massive Hillary turnout when the race was considered all but over. Why would so many waste their time? I understand a few hardcore types doing it, but pulling upset wins?
I guarantee you if for some reason O loses, he is done with national politics. Weren’t there a couple of media types questioning at the time why Hillary won some of the last couple of primaries? They never really did go into it much or I should give us any depth on the topic. It’s been a big lovefest since the nomination but very little in the way of tough questions.
If I know the media like I think I do, they’ll start to grill him some from tomorrow until the inauguration. At some point he’ll have to take some stands that will either show him to the center-right like William Jefferson (Dick Morris years), or where I think he’ll govern from… the left. Remember he has to answer to the Howard Dean/Pelosi/Reid contingency who helped “steal this from Hillary” according to the PUMAs. He’ll have majorities in Congress, and the mandate will be said to govern from the left.
November 3, 2008 at 10:46 PM #298245CardiffBaseballParticipantPartypup I too am fascinated by the whole PUMA thing and little it’s been covered. One of the sites actually had people donating last minute funds to run anti-messiah ads in swing states.
Very good analysis here, and I think you are correct the tightening is occuring. Also you shed on a topic I hadn’t given much thought to, and that is the massive Hillary turnout when the race was considered all but over. Why would so many waste their time? I understand a few hardcore types doing it, but pulling upset wins?
I guarantee you if for some reason O loses, he is done with national politics. Weren’t there a couple of media types questioning at the time why Hillary won some of the last couple of primaries? They never really did go into it much or I should give us any depth on the topic. It’s been a big lovefest since the nomination but very little in the way of tough questions.
If I know the media like I think I do, they’ll start to grill him some from tomorrow until the inauguration. At some point he’ll have to take some stands that will either show him to the center-right like William Jefferson (Dick Morris years), or where I think he’ll govern from… the left. Remember he has to answer to the Howard Dean/Pelosi/Reid contingency who helped “steal this from Hillary” according to the PUMAs. He’ll have majorities in Congress, and the mandate will be said to govern from the left.
November 3, 2008 at 10:46 PM #298259CardiffBaseballParticipantPartypup I too am fascinated by the whole PUMA thing and little it’s been covered. One of the sites actually had people donating last minute funds to run anti-messiah ads in swing states.
Very good analysis here, and I think you are correct the tightening is occuring. Also you shed on a topic I hadn’t given much thought to, and that is the massive Hillary turnout when the race was considered all but over. Why would so many waste their time? I understand a few hardcore types doing it, but pulling upset wins?
I guarantee you if for some reason O loses, he is done with national politics. Weren’t there a couple of media types questioning at the time why Hillary won some of the last couple of primaries? They never really did go into it much or I should give us any depth on the topic. It’s been a big lovefest since the nomination but very little in the way of tough questions.
If I know the media like I think I do, they’ll start to grill him some from tomorrow until the inauguration. At some point he’ll have to take some stands that will either show him to the center-right like William Jefferson (Dick Morris years), or where I think he’ll govern from… the left. Remember he has to answer to the Howard Dean/Pelosi/Reid contingency who helped “steal this from Hillary” according to the PUMAs. He’ll have majorities in Congress, and the mandate will be said to govern from the left.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.