OT: Maybe this is a dumb question

[Djshakes]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=Djshakes]So if they say anything about it they are damned for feeding into it and if they don’t mention it (because frankly it isn’t worth mentioning) they are damned.[/quote]
“Dammed if he responds to it, damned if he doesn’t.”

Gee where have I heard that one before?

[quote=pri_dk]I’m sorry, are we talking about today or four [?] years ago when she was an unknown that came on the scene?[/quote]
“Came on the scene?” Are talking about a Kardashian?

Or are we talking about someone who was chosen, over dozens of qualified people, as the top candidate for one of the most significant political positions in the country?

Do you understand the difference?

So if Palin’s not your gal anymore, who are you supporting these days?

(Lemme guess…I won’t get a response until after you are told the answer during today’s talk-radio broadcast.)[/quote]

I know exactly what you mean. Palin was so well known by the public before the campaign. You can’t be serious about this? Clearly over the past four years since the campaign she has had much more coverage bringing her politics to the limelight.

The problem is there is no worthy candidate of the republican party to support.

[jstoesz]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=jstoesz]Got to love data.[/quote]
I do love data.

But your link has none to support your bogus association between the left and the truthers.

The smoke is just getting thicker.[/quote]

I am quoting here from the 2nd wiki link…

“Thirty-five percent (35%) of Democrats believe he did know, 39% say he did not know, and 26% are not sure.” and “Republicans reject that view and, by a 7-to-1 margin, say the President did not know in advance about the attacks.

[jstoesz]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=jstoesz]Got to love data.[/quote]
I do love data.

But your link has none to support your bogus association between the left and the truthers.

The smoke is just getting thicker.[/quote]

I am quoting here from the 2nd wiki link…

“Thirty-five percent (35%) of Democrats believe he did know, 39% say he did not know, and 26% are not sure.” and “Republicans reject that view and, by a 7-to-1 margin, say the President did not know in advance about the attacks.

[jstoesz]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=jstoesz]Got to love data.[/quote]
I do love data.

But your link has none to support your bogus association between the left and the truthers.

The smoke is just getting thicker.[/quote]

I am quoting here from the 2nd wiki link…

“Thirty-five percent (35%) of Democrats believe he did know, 39% say he did not know, and 26% are not sure.” and “Republicans reject that view and, by a 7-to-1 margin, say the President did not know in advance about the attacks.

[jstoesz]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=jstoesz]Got to love data.[/quote]
I do love data.

But your link has none to support your bogus association between the left and the truthers.

The smoke is just getting thicker.[/quote]

I am quoting here from the 2nd wiki link…

“Thirty-five percent (35%) of Democrats believe he did know, 39% say he did not know, and 26% are not sure.” and “Republicans reject that view and, by a 7-to-1 margin, say the President did not know in advance about the attacks.

[jstoesz]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=jstoesz]Got to love data.[/quote]
I do love data.

But your link has none to support your bogus association between the left and the truthers.

The smoke is just getting thicker.[/quote]

I am quoting here from the 2nd wiki link…

“Thirty-five percent (35%) of Democrats believe he did know, 39% say he did not know, and 26% are not sure.” and “Republicans reject that view and, by a 7-to-1 margin, say the President did not know in advance about the attacks.

[Anonymous]

[quote=jstoesz]I am quoting here from the 2nd wiki link…[/quote]

…which is a single Rasmussen poll.

Here’s some data about your data:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports#Criticism

[Anonymous]

[quote=jstoesz]I am quoting here from the 2nd wiki link…[/quote]

…which is a single Rasmussen poll.

Here’s some data about your data:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports#Criticism

[Anonymous]

[quote=jstoesz]I am quoting here from the 2nd wiki link…[/quote]

…which is a single Rasmussen poll.

Here’s some data about your data:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports#Criticism

[Anonymous]

[quote=jstoesz]I am quoting here from the 2nd wiki link…[/quote]

…which is a single Rasmussen poll.

Here’s some data about your data:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports#Criticism

[Anonymous]

[quote=jstoesz]I am quoting here from the 2nd wiki link…[/quote]

…which is a single Rasmussen poll.

Here’s some data about your data:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports#Criticism

[jstoesz]

Shoot the messenger… It looks like a wash if you ask me. Is Slate a conservative publication, I don’t read it?

Off topic, how do link to a location on a page? I can’t think of anywhere else I have seen that done.

[jstoesz]

Shoot the messenger… It looks like a wash if you ask me. Is Slate a conservative publication, I don’t read it?

Off topic, how do link to a location on a page? I can’t think of anywhere else I have seen that done.

[jstoesz]

Shoot the messenger… It looks like a wash if you ask me. Is Slate a conservative publication, I don’t read it?

Off topic, how do link to a location on a page? I can’t think of anywhere else I have seen that done.

[jstoesz]

Shoot the messenger… It looks like a wash if you ask me. Is Slate a conservative publication, I don’t read it?

Off topic, how do link to a location on a page? I can’t think of anywhere else I have seen that done.

[Author]

Posts