- This topic has 230 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 17, 2008 at 7:33 PM #224566June 17, 2008 at 9:07 PM #224458
sdappraiser
ParticipantToo late.. I’ve got screen shots of it all.
Will sell to highest bidding lawyer.
June 17, 2008 at 9:07 PM #224564ParticipantToo late.. I’ve got screen shots of it all.
Will sell to highest bidding lawyer.
June 17, 2008 at 9:07 PM #224581ParticipantToo late.. I’ve got screen shots of it all.
Will sell to highest bidding lawyer.
June 17, 2008 at 9:07 PM #224612ParticipantToo late.. I’ve got screen shots of it all.
Will sell to highest bidding lawyer.
June 17, 2008 at 9:07 PM #224625ParticipantToo late.. I’ve got screen shots of it all.
Will sell to highest bidding lawyer.
June 17, 2008 at 9:27 PM #224463sd_bear
Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]Did we just jump the shark or what ?
coo-coo, coo-coo
Maybe we need a new subsection of off-topic threads labeled “Nutty” ?[/quote]
How about a subsection just called “Marion” so she can continue to post her inane drivel without bothering everyone else who actually comes here for solid, RELEVANT information.
June 17, 2008 at 9:27 PM #224569Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]Did we just jump the shark or what ?
coo-coo, coo-coo
Maybe we need a new subsection of off-topic threads labeled “Nutty” ?[/quote]
How about a subsection just called “Marion” so she can continue to post her inane drivel without bothering everyone else who actually comes here for solid, RELEVANT information.
June 17, 2008 at 9:27 PM #224586Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]Did we just jump the shark or what ?
coo-coo, coo-coo
Maybe we need a new subsection of off-topic threads labeled “Nutty” ?[/quote]
How about a subsection just called “Marion” so she can continue to post her inane drivel without bothering everyone else who actually comes here for solid, RELEVANT information.
June 17, 2008 at 9:27 PM #224616Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]Did we just jump the shark or what ?
coo-coo, coo-coo
Maybe we need a new subsection of off-topic threads labeled “Nutty” ?[/quote]
How about a subsection just called “Marion” so she can continue to post her inane drivel without bothering everyone else who actually comes here for solid, RELEVANT information.
June 17, 2008 at 9:27 PM #224631Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]Did we just jump the shark or what ?
coo-coo, coo-coo
Maybe we need a new subsection of off-topic threads labeled “Nutty” ?[/quote]
How about a subsection just called “Marion” so she can continue to post her inane drivel without bothering everyone else who actually comes here for solid, RELEVANT information.
June 17, 2008 at 9:52 PM #224478PCinSD
GuestI have absolutely no idea what I’m talking about. I never say ANYTHING on this forum that can be construed as legal advice and/or legal opinion and I’m not starting now. Marion, it appears you just disclosed confidential attorney-client privileged information on the internet. You are the holder of that privilege, from what I’ve learned by watching movies. If you disclose that information, movies tend to show that you have waived the privilege for that particular communication. Even if you ask the guy running the website for a “do over” and request that he “delete” the “incriminating” parts of your post. You should probably talk to your lawyer about this pesky legal stuff. Or not.
June 17, 2008 at 9:52 PM #224584GuestI have absolutely no idea what I’m talking about. I never say ANYTHING on this forum that can be construed as legal advice and/or legal opinion and I’m not starting now. Marion, it appears you just disclosed confidential attorney-client privileged information on the internet. You are the holder of that privilege, from what I’ve learned by watching movies. If you disclose that information, movies tend to show that you have waived the privilege for that particular communication. Even if you ask the guy running the website for a “do over” and request that he “delete” the “incriminating” parts of your post. You should probably talk to your lawyer about this pesky legal stuff. Or not.
June 17, 2008 at 9:52 PM #224600GuestI have absolutely no idea what I’m talking about. I never say ANYTHING on this forum that can be construed as legal advice and/or legal opinion and I’m not starting now. Marion, it appears you just disclosed confidential attorney-client privileged information on the internet. You are the holder of that privilege, from what I’ve learned by watching movies. If you disclose that information, movies tend to show that you have waived the privilege for that particular communication. Even if you ask the guy running the website for a “do over” and request that he “delete” the “incriminating” parts of your post. You should probably talk to your lawyer about this pesky legal stuff. Or not.
June 17, 2008 at 9:52 PM #224632GuestI have absolutely no idea what I’m talking about. I never say ANYTHING on this forum that can be construed as legal advice and/or legal opinion and I’m not starting now. Marion, it appears you just disclosed confidential attorney-client privileged information on the internet. You are the holder of that privilege, from what I’ve learned by watching movies. If you disclose that information, movies tend to show that you have waived the privilege for that particular communication. Even if you ask the guy running the website for a “do over” and request that he “delete” the “incriminating” parts of your post. You should probably talk to your lawyer about this pesky legal stuff. Or not.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.