OT – Joe the Plumber

[meadandale]

[quote=TheBreeze]
Fannie and Freddie ~ $5 trillion
[/quote]

Too bad that half of your $10 trillion figure is for two GSE’s that the evil Republican’s have been trying to regulate for at least 8 years. Your beloved Democratic caretakers resisted additional regulations (and even denied there was a problem) as recently as 2006.

Whose policies are we vilifying again?

Yeah, don’t let the truth get in the way of your story.

[meadandale]

[quote=asianautica]
Let me get this straight, you claim yourself to be a Democrat, but you hate the bailouts that majority of the Democrats in congress support. [/quote]

TheBreeze is one angry loony tune. Based on his responses in this thread alone, it’s clear that he knows absolutely NOTHING about how to run a business, including the one he works for.

I’ll have more respect (when you are in the basement, there’s only one place to go) for him when I hear that he’s met his first payroll and paid his first corporate tax bill. Until then, his monikor reflects the copious amount of hot air that he spews forth.

[meadandale]

[quote=asianautica]
Let me get this straight, you claim yourself to be a Democrat, but you hate the bailouts that majority of the Democrats in congress support. [/quote]

TheBreeze is one angry loony tune. Based on his responses in this thread alone, it’s clear that he knows absolutely NOTHING about how to run a business, including the one he works for.

I’ll have more respect (when you are in the basement, there’s only one place to go) for him when I hear that he’s met his first payroll and paid his first corporate tax bill. Until then, his monikor reflects the copious amount of hot air that he spews forth.

[meadandale]

[quote=asianautica]
Let me get this straight, you claim yourself to be a Democrat, but you hate the bailouts that majority of the Democrats in congress support. [/quote]

TheBreeze is one angry loony tune. Based on his responses in this thread alone, it’s clear that he knows absolutely NOTHING about how to run a business, including the one he works for.

I’ll have more respect (when you are in the basement, there’s only one place to go) for him when I hear that he’s met his first payroll and paid his first corporate tax bill. Until then, his monikor reflects the copious amount of hot air that he spews forth.

[meadandale]

[quote=asianautica]
Let me get this straight, you claim yourself to be a Democrat, but you hate the bailouts that majority of the Democrats in congress support. [/quote]

TheBreeze is one angry loony tune. Based on his responses in this thread alone, it’s clear that he knows absolutely NOTHING about how to run a business, including the one he works for.

I’ll have more respect (when you are in the basement, there’s only one place to go) for him when I hear that he’s met his first payroll and paid his first corporate tax bill. Until then, his monikor reflects the copious amount of hot air that he spews forth.

[meadandale]

[quote=asianautica]
Let me get this straight, you claim yourself to be a Democrat, but you hate the bailouts that majority of the Democrats in congress support. [/quote]

TheBreeze is one angry loony tune. Based on his responses in this thread alone, it’s clear that he knows absolutely NOTHING about how to run a business, including the one he works for.

I’ll have more respect (when you are in the basement, there’s only one place to go) for him when I hear that he’s met his first payroll and paid his first corporate tax bill. Until then, his monikor reflects the copious amount of hot air that he spews forth.

[Dukehorn]

Oh please.

Here’s a Republican party that expects corporations to self-report their crimes (for EPA and SEC violations) and has lowered the budget for inspectors in both agencies. Who believes that white collar criminals have a greater propensity to turn themselves in than street felons? Only the current Republican incarnation. Oh really, white collar criminals like to turn themselves in?? What @#@#$@ study showed that?

Fixate on the numbers all you want, but the question is how did we get there? Lack of regulation/oversight.

Remember in the 80s when the military was paying for $800 dollar toilets? Due to what? Lack of regulation/oversight.

For all the squealing by the conservatives here about the bailout, the irony is that the conservatives didn’t want caps on executive compensation for companies that needed the bailout money.

So who’s being the idiot? Complaining about a bailout that’s trying to save our economy yet supporting the fact that executives being “bailed out” continue to receive their golden parachutes.

Dumb and dumber.

Meanwhile, look at Buckley, Parker, Will and Brooks recent spat of conservative essays wondering why anti-intellectualism and anti-education is governing the Republican party. You really think the US is going to be a competitive science power when we mock evolution, going to good schools, getting educated.

Little did I know that the immigrant dream of going to a good school is the penalty that’s forcing my generation of Asian-Americans to turn Dem. I mean if middle America is going to mock the Harvard, Yale, Duke, Stanford, MIT, Chicago grads, we’ll go Dem (travel around in the 3rd World a bit and realize that our taxes actually provide some useful infrastructure).

As for Obama being a Marxist, maybe someone should go back to school and study Marxism…..

And if you really think Jimmy Carter caused the housing bubble as opposed to lack of regulation regarding mortgage applications and derivative trading, you’re a @#$@ lost cause.

Furthermore, a number of you are being intellectually disingenuous when it comes to the bailout. Supporting the bailout from a pure save the economy viewpoint does not equate to supporting the policies that led to the bailout. Take your populist arguments where they belong. In the trash.

[Dukehorn]

Oh please.

Here’s a Republican party that expects corporations to self-report their crimes (for EPA and SEC violations) and has lowered the budget for inspectors in both agencies. Who believes that white collar criminals have a greater propensity to turn themselves in than street felons? Only the current Republican incarnation. Oh really, white collar criminals like to turn themselves in?? What @#@#$@ study showed that?

Fixate on the numbers all you want, but the question is how did we get there? Lack of regulation/oversight.

Remember in the 80s when the military was paying for $800 dollar toilets? Due to what? Lack of regulation/oversight.

For all the squealing by the conservatives here about the bailout, the irony is that the conservatives didn’t want caps on executive compensation for companies that needed the bailout money.

So who’s being the idiot? Complaining about a bailout that’s trying to save our economy yet supporting the fact that executives being “bailed out” continue to receive their golden parachutes.

Dumb and dumber.

Meanwhile, look at Buckley, Parker, Will and Brooks recent spat of conservative essays wondering why anti-intellectualism and anti-education is governing the Republican party. You really think the US is going to be a competitive science power when we mock evolution, going to good schools, getting educated.

Little did I know that the immigrant dream of going to a good school is the penalty that’s forcing my generation of Asian-Americans to turn Dem. I mean if middle America is going to mock the Harvard, Yale, Duke, Stanford, MIT, Chicago grads, we’ll go Dem (travel around in the 3rd World a bit and realize that our taxes actually provide some useful infrastructure).

As for Obama being a Marxist, maybe someone should go back to school and study Marxism…..

And if you really think Jimmy Carter caused the housing bubble as opposed to lack of regulation regarding mortgage applications and derivative trading, you’re a @#$@ lost cause.

Furthermore, a number of you are being intellectually disingenuous when it comes to the bailout. Supporting the bailout from a pure save the economy viewpoint does not equate to supporting the policies that led to the bailout. Take your populist arguments where they belong. In the trash.

[Dukehorn]

Oh please.

Here’s a Republican party that expects corporations to self-report their crimes (for EPA and SEC violations) and has lowered the budget for inspectors in both agencies. Who believes that white collar criminals have a greater propensity to turn themselves in than street felons? Only the current Republican incarnation. Oh really, white collar criminals like to turn themselves in?? What @#@#$@ study showed that?

Fixate on the numbers all you want, but the question is how did we get there? Lack of regulation/oversight.

Remember in the 80s when the military was paying for $800 dollar toilets? Due to what? Lack of regulation/oversight.

For all the squealing by the conservatives here about the bailout, the irony is that the conservatives didn’t want caps on executive compensation for companies that needed the bailout money.

So who’s being the idiot? Complaining about a bailout that’s trying to save our economy yet supporting the fact that executives being “bailed out” continue to receive their golden parachutes.

Dumb and dumber.

Meanwhile, look at Buckley, Parker, Will and Brooks recent spat of conservative essays wondering why anti-intellectualism and anti-education is governing the Republican party. You really think the US is going to be a competitive science power when we mock evolution, going to good schools, getting educated.

Little did I know that the immigrant dream of going to a good school is the penalty that’s forcing my generation of Asian-Americans to turn Dem. I mean if middle America is going to mock the Harvard, Yale, Duke, Stanford, MIT, Chicago grads, we’ll go Dem (travel around in the 3rd World a bit and realize that our taxes actually provide some useful infrastructure).

As for Obama being a Marxist, maybe someone should go back to school and study Marxism…..

And if you really think Jimmy Carter caused the housing bubble as opposed to lack of regulation regarding mortgage applications and derivative trading, you’re a @#$@ lost cause.

Furthermore, a number of you are being intellectually disingenuous when it comes to the bailout. Supporting the bailout from a pure save the economy viewpoint does not equate to supporting the policies that led to the bailout. Take your populist arguments where they belong. In the trash.

[Dukehorn]

Oh please.

Here’s a Republican party that expects corporations to self-report their crimes (for EPA and SEC violations) and has lowered the budget for inspectors in both agencies. Who believes that white collar criminals have a greater propensity to turn themselves in than street felons? Only the current Republican incarnation. Oh really, white collar criminals like to turn themselves in?? What @#@#$@ study showed that?

Fixate on the numbers all you want, but the question is how did we get there? Lack of regulation/oversight.

Remember in the 80s when the military was paying for $800 dollar toilets? Due to what? Lack of regulation/oversight.

For all the squealing by the conservatives here about the bailout, the irony is that the conservatives didn’t want caps on executive compensation for companies that needed the bailout money.

So who’s being the idiot? Complaining about a bailout that’s trying to save our economy yet supporting the fact that executives being “bailed out” continue to receive their golden parachutes.

Dumb and dumber.

Meanwhile, look at Buckley, Parker, Will and Brooks recent spat of conservative essays wondering why anti-intellectualism and anti-education is governing the Republican party. You really think the US is going to be a competitive science power when we mock evolution, going to good schools, getting educated.

Little did I know that the immigrant dream of going to a good school is the penalty that’s forcing my generation of Asian-Americans to turn Dem. I mean if middle America is going to mock the Harvard, Yale, Duke, Stanford, MIT, Chicago grads, we’ll go Dem (travel around in the 3rd World a bit and realize that our taxes actually provide some useful infrastructure).

As for Obama being a Marxist, maybe someone should go back to school and study Marxism…..

And if you really think Jimmy Carter caused the housing bubble as opposed to lack of regulation regarding mortgage applications and derivative trading, you’re a @#$@ lost cause.

Furthermore, a number of you are being intellectually disingenuous when it comes to the bailout. Supporting the bailout from a pure save the economy viewpoint does not equate to supporting the policies that led to the bailout. Take your populist arguments where they belong. In the trash.

[Dukehorn]

Oh please.

Here’s a Republican party that expects corporations to self-report their crimes (for EPA and SEC violations) and has lowered the budget for inspectors in both agencies. Who believes that white collar criminals have a greater propensity to turn themselves in than street felons? Only the current Republican incarnation. Oh really, white collar criminals like to turn themselves in?? What @#@#$@ study showed that?

Fixate on the numbers all you want, but the question is how did we get there? Lack of regulation/oversight.

Remember in the 80s when the military was paying for $800 dollar toilets? Due to what? Lack of regulation/oversight.

For all the squealing by the conservatives here about the bailout, the irony is that the conservatives didn’t want caps on executive compensation for companies that needed the bailout money.

So who’s being the idiot? Complaining about a bailout that’s trying to save our economy yet supporting the fact that executives being “bailed out” continue to receive their golden parachutes.

Dumb and dumber.

Meanwhile, look at Buckley, Parker, Will and Brooks recent spat of conservative essays wondering why anti-intellectualism and anti-education is governing the Republican party. You really think the US is going to be a competitive science power when we mock evolution, going to good schools, getting educated.

Little did I know that the immigrant dream of going to a good school is the penalty that’s forcing my generation of Asian-Americans to turn Dem. I mean if middle America is going to mock the Harvard, Yale, Duke, Stanford, MIT, Chicago grads, we’ll go Dem (travel around in the 3rd World a bit and realize that our taxes actually provide some useful infrastructure).

As for Obama being a Marxist, maybe someone should go back to school and study Marxism…..

And if you really think Jimmy Carter caused the housing bubble as opposed to lack of regulation regarding mortgage applications and derivative trading, you’re a @#$@ lost cause.

Furthermore, a number of you are being intellectually disingenuous when it comes to the bailout. Supporting the bailout from a pure save the economy viewpoint does not equate to supporting the policies that led to the bailout. Take your populist arguments where they belong. In the trash.

[Coronita]

[quote=Dukehorn]Oh please.

Little did I know that the immigrant dream of going to a good school is the penalty that’s forcing my generation of Asian-Americans to turn Dem. I mean if middle America is going to mock the Harvard, Yale, Duke, Stanford, MIT, Chicago grads, we’ll go Dem (travel around in the 3rd World a bit and realize that our taxes actually provide some useful infrastructure).
.[/quote]

That’s interesting. Because from my perspective, I see stereotyped Democrats (the stereotyped, union folks, pro middle class labor, pro manufacturing, anti-foreign goods, anti-outsourcing, anti-h1-b folks, the “they’re steal our jobs”, “they steal our education” mentality to be more of threat to asian americans than anything else.

Two words: affirmative action.
Two more words: asian quotas.

I wonder where these ridiculous concepts started.
It’s the “they” concept that these politicians through around over and over and over again.

Repubs I believe have been more friendly to asians than democrats, who policy after policy, have been blaming everything of job loss to “overseas workers” (with I would say the exception is clinton). I don’t know about you, but I find that disturbing as an asian american. I wonder where the asian bashing all started.
And yes our “New Deal” father was also the one that signed the executive order to stick all those “japs” into a concentration camp.

Democrats being a melting pot for minorities? Please….Maybe if you’re african american or hispanic. But I see sh!tload of social policies that have screwed asians up the creek. Fortunately, living in CA, it’s really not an issue, I guess.

But suit yourself. Let’s see this economy go in the crapper, see when Obama and the Democrats get into office, who they’ll blame on all of this job loss and outsourcing. The finger will point at China, and you (unless you dyed your hair blond and change your last name to Chandler) will have a nice target by your good ole union boy that beats you up because he’s pissed his blue collar UAW went overseas due to unfair competition.

It’s gonna be sh!t like this all over again
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Chin

[Coronita]

[quote=Dukehorn]Oh please.

Little did I know that the immigrant dream of going to a good school is the penalty that’s forcing my generation of Asian-Americans to turn Dem. I mean if middle America is going to mock the Harvard, Yale, Duke, Stanford, MIT, Chicago grads, we’ll go Dem (travel around in the 3rd World a bit and realize that our taxes actually provide some useful infrastructure).
.[/quote]

That’s interesting. Because from my perspective, I see stereotyped Democrats (the stereotyped, union folks, pro middle class labor, pro manufacturing, anti-foreign goods, anti-outsourcing, anti-h1-b folks, the “they’re steal our jobs”, “they steal our education” mentality to be more of threat to asian americans than anything else.

Two words: affirmative action.
Two more words: asian quotas.

I wonder where these ridiculous concepts started.
It’s the “they” concept that these politicians through around over and over and over again.

Repubs I believe have been more friendly to asians than democrats, who policy after policy, have been blaming everything of job loss to “overseas workers” (with I would say the exception is clinton). I don’t know about you, but I find that disturbing as an asian american. I wonder where the asian bashing all started.
And yes our “New Deal” father was also the one that signed the executive order to stick all those “japs” into a concentration camp.

Democrats being a melting pot for minorities? Please….Maybe if you’re african american or hispanic. But I see sh!tload of social policies that have screwed asians up the creek. Fortunately, living in CA, it’s really not an issue, I guess.

But suit yourself. Let’s see this economy go in the crapper, see when Obama and the Democrats get into office, who they’ll blame on all of this job loss and outsourcing. The finger will point at China, and you (unless you dyed your hair blond and change your last name to Chandler) will have a nice target by your good ole union boy that beats you up because he’s pissed his blue collar UAW went overseas due to unfair competition.

It’s gonna be sh!t like this all over again
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Chin

[Coronita]

[quote=Dukehorn]Oh please.

Little did I know that the immigrant dream of going to a good school is the penalty that’s forcing my generation of Asian-Americans to turn Dem. I mean if middle America is going to mock the Harvard, Yale, Duke, Stanford, MIT, Chicago grads, we’ll go Dem (travel around in the 3rd World a bit and realize that our taxes actually provide some useful infrastructure).
.[/quote]

That’s interesting. Because from my perspective, I see stereotyped Democrats (the stereotyped, union folks, pro middle class labor, pro manufacturing, anti-foreign goods, anti-outsourcing, anti-h1-b folks, the “they’re steal our jobs”, “they steal our education” mentality to be more of threat to asian americans than anything else.

Two words: affirmative action.
Two more words: asian quotas.

I wonder where these ridiculous concepts started.
It’s the “they” concept that these politicians through around over and over and over again.

Repubs I believe have been more friendly to asians than democrats, who policy after policy, have been blaming everything of job loss to “overseas workers” (with I would say the exception is clinton). I don’t know about you, but I find that disturbing as an asian american. I wonder where the asian bashing all started.
And yes our “New Deal” father was also the one that signed the executive order to stick all those “japs” into a concentration camp.

Democrats being a melting pot for minorities? Please….Maybe if you’re african american or hispanic. But I see sh!tload of social policies that have screwed asians up the creek. Fortunately, living in CA, it’s really not an issue, I guess.

But suit yourself. Let’s see this economy go in the crapper, see when Obama and the Democrats get into office, who they’ll blame on all of this job loss and outsourcing. The finger will point at China, and you (unless you dyed your hair blond and change your last name to Chandler) will have a nice target by your good ole union boy that beats you up because he’s pissed his blue collar UAW went overseas due to unfair competition.

It’s gonna be sh!t like this all over again
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Chin

[Coronita]

[quote=Dukehorn]Oh please.

Little did I know that the immigrant dream of going to a good school is the penalty that’s forcing my generation of Asian-Americans to turn Dem. I mean if middle America is going to mock the Harvard, Yale, Duke, Stanford, MIT, Chicago grads, we’ll go Dem (travel around in the 3rd World a bit and realize that our taxes actually provide some useful infrastructure).
.[/quote]

That’s interesting. Because from my perspective, I see stereotyped Democrats (the stereotyped, union folks, pro middle class labor, pro manufacturing, anti-foreign goods, anti-outsourcing, anti-h1-b folks, the “they’re steal our jobs”, “they steal our education” mentality to be more of threat to asian americans than anything else.

Two words: affirmative action.
Two more words: asian quotas.

I wonder where these ridiculous concepts started.
It’s the “they” concept that these politicians through around over and over and over again.

Repubs I believe have been more friendly to asians than democrats, who policy after policy, have been blaming everything of job loss to “overseas workers” (with I would say the exception is clinton). I don’t know about you, but I find that disturbing as an asian american. I wonder where the asian bashing all started.
And yes our “New Deal” father was also the one that signed the executive order to stick all those “japs” into a concentration camp.

Democrats being a melting pot for minorities? Please….Maybe if you’re african american or hispanic. But I see sh!tload of social policies that have screwed asians up the creek. Fortunately, living in CA, it’s really not an issue, I guess.

But suit yourself. Let’s see this economy go in the crapper, see when Obama and the Democrats get into office, who they’ll blame on all of this job loss and outsourcing. The finger will point at China, and you (unless you dyed your hair blond and change your last name to Chandler) will have a nice target by your good ole union boy that beats you up because he’s pissed his blue collar UAW went overseas due to unfair competition.

It’s gonna be sh!t like this all over again
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Chin

[Author]

Posts