- This topic has 85 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by Rich Toscano.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 9, 2008 at 12:02 PM #220388June 9, 2008 at 12:17 PM #220414Rich ToscanoKeymaster
To the poster formerly known as RatherOpinionated, RemingtonRd, and YokohamaCt; and now going by the handle poway_seller —
Everything on the PCA site has been approved pre-publishing by my b/d’s general counsel. He has also approved my linking from this site to the PCA site. (Additionally everything I write on this site is reviewed by my OSJ and sent for the record to general counsel).
Now, I can’t help but think that if you were really concerned about my welfare, you wouldn’t attempt to call me out for a perceived (and wrong) violation of FINRA regulations on a public message board. So it seems pretty clear that you are trying to make trouble once again. So let’s just cut that out right now, ok?
June 9, 2008 at 12:17 PM #220394Rich ToscanoKeymasterTo the poster formerly known as RatherOpinionated, RemingtonRd, and YokohamaCt; and now going by the handle poway_seller —
Everything on the PCA site has been approved pre-publishing by my b/d’s general counsel. He has also approved my linking from this site to the PCA site. (Additionally everything I write on this site is reviewed by my OSJ and sent for the record to general counsel).
Now, I can’t help but think that if you were really concerned about my welfare, you wouldn’t attempt to call me out for a perceived (and wrong) violation of FINRA regulations on a public message board. So it seems pretty clear that you are trying to make trouble once again. So let’s just cut that out right now, ok?
June 9, 2008 at 12:17 PM #220250Rich ToscanoKeymasterTo the poster formerly known as RatherOpinionated, RemingtonRd, and YokohamaCt; and now going by the handle poway_seller —
Everything on the PCA site has been approved pre-publishing by my b/d’s general counsel. He has also approved my linking from this site to the PCA site. (Additionally everything I write on this site is reviewed by my OSJ and sent for the record to general counsel).
Now, I can’t help but think that if you were really concerned about my welfare, you wouldn’t attempt to call me out for a perceived (and wrong) violation of FINRA regulations on a public message board. So it seems pretty clear that you are trying to make trouble once again. So let’s just cut that out right now, ok?
June 9, 2008 at 12:17 PM #220362Rich ToscanoKeymasterTo the poster formerly known as RatherOpinionated, RemingtonRd, and YokohamaCt; and now going by the handle poway_seller —
Everything on the PCA site has been approved pre-publishing by my b/d’s general counsel. He has also approved my linking from this site to the PCA site. (Additionally everything I write on this site is reviewed by my OSJ and sent for the record to general counsel).
Now, I can’t help but think that if you were really concerned about my welfare, you wouldn’t attempt to call me out for a perceived (and wrong) violation of FINRA regulations on a public message board. So it seems pretty clear that you are trying to make trouble once again. So let’s just cut that out right now, ok?
June 9, 2008 at 12:17 PM #220348Rich ToscanoKeymasterTo the poster formerly known as RatherOpinionated, RemingtonRd, and YokohamaCt; and now going by the handle poway_seller —
Everything on the PCA site has been approved pre-publishing by my b/d’s general counsel. He has also approved my linking from this site to the PCA site. (Additionally everything I write on this site is reviewed by my OSJ and sent for the record to general counsel).
Now, I can’t help but think that if you were really concerned about my welfare, you wouldn’t attempt to call me out for a perceived (and wrong) violation of FINRA regulations on a public message board. So it seems pretty clear that you are trying to make trouble once again. So let’s just cut that out right now, ok?
June 9, 2008 at 12:35 PM #220361poway_sellerParticipantyou can go ahead and delete this past interaction.
However, while your PCA content is likely compliance approved, my point about you actively soliciting traffic to that link likely is not.
okay, now you can delete it.
June 9, 2008 at 12:35 PM #220406poway_sellerParticipantyou can go ahead and delete this past interaction.
However, while your PCA content is likely compliance approved, my point about you actively soliciting traffic to that link likely is not.
okay, now you can delete it.
June 9, 2008 at 12:35 PM #220427poway_sellerParticipantyou can go ahead and delete this past interaction.
However, while your PCA content is likely compliance approved, my point about you actively soliciting traffic to that link likely is not.
okay, now you can delete it.
June 9, 2008 at 12:35 PM #220377poway_sellerParticipantyou can go ahead and delete this past interaction.
However, while your PCA content is likely compliance approved, my point about you actively soliciting traffic to that link likely is not.
okay, now you can delete it.
June 9, 2008 at 12:35 PM #220265poway_sellerParticipantyou can go ahead and delete this past interaction.
However, while your PCA content is likely compliance approved, my point about you actively soliciting traffic to that link likely is not.
okay, now you can delete it.
June 9, 2008 at 1:02 PM #220408Rich ToscanoKeymasterI’m not going to delete anything because I have nothing to hide. It just seemed to me like you were trying to make my life difficult. Forgive me if that interpretation was incorrect.
Like I said above, everything I put on this site and the PCA site is reviewed, approved, and recorded for compliance. Linking from one compliant site to another is not a compliance violation in any way and I have no idea why you think it would be. Thanks for your concern (and I mean that sincerely, if indeed that’s really what this is).
Rich
June 9, 2008 at 1:02 PM #220295Rich ToscanoKeymasterI’m not going to delete anything because I have nothing to hide. It just seemed to me like you were trying to make my life difficult. Forgive me if that interpretation was incorrect.
Like I said above, everything I put on this site and the PCA site is reviewed, approved, and recorded for compliance. Linking from one compliant site to another is not a compliance violation in any way and I have no idea why you think it would be. Thanks for your concern (and I mean that sincerely, if indeed that’s really what this is).
Rich
June 9, 2008 at 1:02 PM #220391Rich ToscanoKeymasterI’m not going to delete anything because I have nothing to hide. It just seemed to me like you were trying to make my life difficult. Forgive me if that interpretation was incorrect.
Like I said above, everything I put on this site and the PCA site is reviewed, approved, and recorded for compliance. Linking from one compliant site to another is not a compliance violation in any way and I have no idea why you think it would be. Thanks for your concern (and I mean that sincerely, if indeed that’s really what this is).
Rich
June 9, 2008 at 1:02 PM #220438Rich ToscanoKeymasterI’m not going to delete anything because I have nothing to hide. It just seemed to me like you were trying to make my life difficult. Forgive me if that interpretation was incorrect.
Like I said above, everything I put on this site and the PCA site is reviewed, approved, and recorded for compliance. Linking from one compliant site to another is not a compliance violation in any way and I have no idea why you think it would be. Thanks for your concern (and I mean that sincerely, if indeed that’s really what this is).
Rich
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.