- This topic has 280 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by
Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 14, 2011 at 4:27 PM #655052January 14, 2011 at 4:45 PM #653955
CoronitaParticipant[quote=faterikcartman][quote=flu] …So I have to ask techies here. Anyone do a Atom/Android port yet????? What oh where are your Atom?? [/quote]
Techies + Atom = Does Not Compute[/quote]
I guess this what they mean by “Intel Outside”? 🙁
Hey, maybe they can sell some WiMax chips…Oh wait…
So, want to know what happened to the the previous $9billion spending at Intel? It was sold to Marvel for $600million….
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/intel-sells-phone-chip-unit-to-marvell-tech-for-600-mln
How about a DSP company?
Intel sells off DSP division Dialogichttp://www.zdnet.com/blog/ou/intel-sells-off-dsp-division-dialogic/290
How about enterprise storage?
Intel Sells Off Enterprise and Storage Assets to Emcore. Intel Gets Rid of Yet Another Non-Core AssetGot RFID? (Didn’t this lead to NFC,BTW ???)
Intel Sells RFID Business to Seattle CompanyIs there anything Intel didn’t try, didn’t fail miserably? Apparently not….
Intel Sells Off Telco Carrier, Network Server Division to German Computer MakerOh, and speaking of buying antivirus software…It’s not like Intel didn’t try this before, like in 1996… Wanna know how that one turned out?
Symantec Buys Intel’s Anti-Virus Businesshttp://www.symantec.com/about/news/release/article.jsp?prid=19980928_01
Lol…The definition of insanity is repeating the exact same things over and over again, and expecting completely different results….as Intel has proven over and over again.
January 14, 2011 at 4:45 PM #654021CoronitaParticipant[quote=faterikcartman][quote=flu] …So I have to ask techies here. Anyone do a Atom/Android port yet????? What oh where are your Atom?? [/quote]
Techies + Atom = Does Not Compute[/quote]
I guess this what they mean by “Intel Outside”? 🙁
Hey, maybe they can sell some WiMax chips…Oh wait…
So, want to know what happened to the the previous $9billion spending at Intel? It was sold to Marvel for $600million….
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/intel-sells-phone-chip-unit-to-marvell-tech-for-600-mln
How about a DSP company?
Intel sells off DSP division Dialogichttp://www.zdnet.com/blog/ou/intel-sells-off-dsp-division-dialogic/290
How about enterprise storage?
Intel Sells Off Enterprise and Storage Assets to Emcore. Intel Gets Rid of Yet Another Non-Core AssetGot RFID? (Didn’t this lead to NFC,BTW ???)
Intel Sells RFID Business to Seattle CompanyIs there anything Intel didn’t try, didn’t fail miserably? Apparently not….
Intel Sells Off Telco Carrier, Network Server Division to German Computer MakerOh, and speaking of buying antivirus software…It’s not like Intel didn’t try this before, like in 1996… Wanna know how that one turned out?
Symantec Buys Intel’s Anti-Virus Businesshttp://www.symantec.com/about/news/release/article.jsp?prid=19980928_01
Lol…The definition of insanity is repeating the exact same things over and over again, and expecting completely different results….as Intel has proven over and over again.
January 14, 2011 at 4:45 PM #654607CoronitaParticipant[quote=faterikcartman][quote=flu] …So I have to ask techies here. Anyone do a Atom/Android port yet????? What oh where are your Atom?? [/quote]
Techies + Atom = Does Not Compute[/quote]
I guess this what they mean by “Intel Outside”? 🙁
Hey, maybe they can sell some WiMax chips…Oh wait…
So, want to know what happened to the the previous $9billion spending at Intel? It was sold to Marvel for $600million….
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/intel-sells-phone-chip-unit-to-marvell-tech-for-600-mln
How about a DSP company?
Intel sells off DSP division Dialogichttp://www.zdnet.com/blog/ou/intel-sells-off-dsp-division-dialogic/290
How about enterprise storage?
Intel Sells Off Enterprise and Storage Assets to Emcore. Intel Gets Rid of Yet Another Non-Core AssetGot RFID? (Didn’t this lead to NFC,BTW ???)
Intel Sells RFID Business to Seattle CompanyIs there anything Intel didn’t try, didn’t fail miserably? Apparently not….
Intel Sells Off Telco Carrier, Network Server Division to German Computer MakerOh, and speaking of buying antivirus software…It’s not like Intel didn’t try this before, like in 1996… Wanna know how that one turned out?
Symantec Buys Intel’s Anti-Virus Businesshttp://www.symantec.com/about/news/release/article.jsp?prid=19980928_01
Lol…The definition of insanity is repeating the exact same things over and over again, and expecting completely different results….as Intel has proven over and over again.
January 14, 2011 at 4:45 PM #654743CoronitaParticipant[quote=faterikcartman][quote=flu] …So I have to ask techies here. Anyone do a Atom/Android port yet????? What oh where are your Atom?? [/quote]
Techies + Atom = Does Not Compute[/quote]
I guess this what they mean by “Intel Outside”? 🙁
Hey, maybe they can sell some WiMax chips…Oh wait…
So, want to know what happened to the the previous $9billion spending at Intel? It was sold to Marvel for $600million….
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/intel-sells-phone-chip-unit-to-marvell-tech-for-600-mln
How about a DSP company?
Intel sells off DSP division Dialogichttp://www.zdnet.com/blog/ou/intel-sells-off-dsp-division-dialogic/290
How about enterprise storage?
Intel Sells Off Enterprise and Storage Assets to Emcore. Intel Gets Rid of Yet Another Non-Core AssetGot RFID? (Didn’t this lead to NFC,BTW ???)
Intel Sells RFID Business to Seattle CompanyIs there anything Intel didn’t try, didn’t fail miserably? Apparently not….
Intel Sells Off Telco Carrier, Network Server Division to German Computer MakerOh, and speaking of buying antivirus software…It’s not like Intel didn’t try this before, like in 1996… Wanna know how that one turned out?
Symantec Buys Intel’s Anti-Virus Businesshttp://www.symantec.com/about/news/release/article.jsp?prid=19980928_01
Lol…The definition of insanity is repeating the exact same things over and over again, and expecting completely different results….as Intel has proven over and over again.
January 14, 2011 at 4:45 PM #655072CoronitaParticipant[quote=faterikcartman][quote=flu] …So I have to ask techies here. Anyone do a Atom/Android port yet????? What oh where are your Atom?? [/quote]
Techies + Atom = Does Not Compute[/quote]
I guess this what they mean by “Intel Outside”? 🙁
Hey, maybe they can sell some WiMax chips…Oh wait…
So, want to know what happened to the the previous $9billion spending at Intel? It was sold to Marvel for $600million….
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/intel-sells-phone-chip-unit-to-marvell-tech-for-600-mln
How about a DSP company?
Intel sells off DSP division Dialogichttp://www.zdnet.com/blog/ou/intel-sells-off-dsp-division-dialogic/290
How about enterprise storage?
Intel Sells Off Enterprise and Storage Assets to Emcore. Intel Gets Rid of Yet Another Non-Core AssetGot RFID? (Didn’t this lead to NFC,BTW ???)
Intel Sells RFID Business to Seattle CompanyIs there anything Intel didn’t try, didn’t fail miserably? Apparently not….
Intel Sells Off Telco Carrier, Network Server Division to German Computer MakerOh, and speaking of buying antivirus software…It’s not like Intel didn’t try this before, like in 1996… Wanna know how that one turned out?
Symantec Buys Intel’s Anti-Virus Businesshttp://www.symantec.com/about/news/release/article.jsp?prid=19980928_01
Lol…The definition of insanity is repeating the exact same things over and over again, and expecting completely different results….as Intel has proven over and over again.
January 14, 2011 at 4:49 PM #653979faterikcartman
ParticipantMaybe too long not feeling threatened by AMD? Getting too comfortable being the best buggy whip maker around to notice the growth market isn’t buggies anymore, but cars (i.e., mobile devices)?
Maybe I don’t pay as much attention as when I sued technology companies for a living so maybe I’m missing something, but from my casual perspective lately I’ve been confused watching Intel get in a lot of tablets with Atom early, but appearing to lag behind the competition. Not getting everything on one chip; using too much power vis-a-vie the competition; too slow per watt; and isn’t their latest version barely, if any, better than the last?
It just doesn’t sound like Intel is intent on being a/the mobile leader, and it shows. Since mobile smartphones/pads etc. will, IMO, be driving growth for while I think they’re going to go nowhere being king of the desktop hill.
And their acquisition strategy (maybe that’s too generous of a word here) suggests a lot of money and no clear plan of what to do with it.
Again, I haven’t studied them in depth in years, but this is how things strike me. I concede I could be off.
January 14, 2011 at 4:49 PM #654045ParticipantMaybe too long not feeling threatened by AMD? Getting too comfortable being the best buggy whip maker around to notice the growth market isn’t buggies anymore, but cars (i.e., mobile devices)?
Maybe I don’t pay as much attention as when I sued technology companies for a living so maybe I’m missing something, but from my casual perspective lately I’ve been confused watching Intel get in a lot of tablets with Atom early, but appearing to lag behind the competition. Not getting everything on one chip; using too much power vis-a-vie the competition; too slow per watt; and isn’t their latest version barely, if any, better than the last?
It just doesn’t sound like Intel is intent on being a/the mobile leader, and it shows. Since mobile smartphones/pads etc. will, IMO, be driving growth for while I think they’re going to go nowhere being king of the desktop hill.
And their acquisition strategy (maybe that’s too generous of a word here) suggests a lot of money and no clear plan of what to do with it.
Again, I haven’t studied them in depth in years, but this is how things strike me. I concede I could be off.
January 14, 2011 at 4:49 PM #654632ParticipantMaybe too long not feeling threatened by AMD? Getting too comfortable being the best buggy whip maker around to notice the growth market isn’t buggies anymore, but cars (i.e., mobile devices)?
Maybe I don’t pay as much attention as when I sued technology companies for a living so maybe I’m missing something, but from my casual perspective lately I’ve been confused watching Intel get in a lot of tablets with Atom early, but appearing to lag behind the competition. Not getting everything on one chip; using too much power vis-a-vie the competition; too slow per watt; and isn’t their latest version barely, if any, better than the last?
It just doesn’t sound like Intel is intent on being a/the mobile leader, and it shows. Since mobile smartphones/pads etc. will, IMO, be driving growth for while I think they’re going to go nowhere being king of the desktop hill.
And their acquisition strategy (maybe that’s too generous of a word here) suggests a lot of money and no clear plan of what to do with it.
Again, I haven’t studied them in depth in years, but this is how things strike me. I concede I could be off.
January 14, 2011 at 4:49 PM #654768ParticipantMaybe too long not feeling threatened by AMD? Getting too comfortable being the best buggy whip maker around to notice the growth market isn’t buggies anymore, but cars (i.e., mobile devices)?
Maybe I don’t pay as much attention as when I sued technology companies for a living so maybe I’m missing something, but from my casual perspective lately I’ve been confused watching Intel get in a lot of tablets with Atom early, but appearing to lag behind the competition. Not getting everything on one chip; using too much power vis-a-vie the competition; too slow per watt; and isn’t their latest version barely, if any, better than the last?
It just doesn’t sound like Intel is intent on being a/the mobile leader, and it shows. Since mobile smartphones/pads etc. will, IMO, be driving growth for while I think they’re going to go nowhere being king of the desktop hill.
And their acquisition strategy (maybe that’s too generous of a word here) suggests a lot of money and no clear plan of what to do with it.
Again, I haven’t studied them in depth in years, but this is how things strike me. I concede I could be off.
January 14, 2011 at 4:49 PM #655097ParticipantMaybe too long not feeling threatened by AMD? Getting too comfortable being the best buggy whip maker around to notice the growth market isn’t buggies anymore, but cars (i.e., mobile devices)?
Maybe I don’t pay as much attention as when I sued technology companies for a living so maybe I’m missing something, but from my casual perspective lately I’ve been confused watching Intel get in a lot of tablets with Atom early, but appearing to lag behind the competition. Not getting everything on one chip; using too much power vis-a-vie the competition; too slow per watt; and isn’t their latest version barely, if any, better than the last?
It just doesn’t sound like Intel is intent on being a/the mobile leader, and it shows. Since mobile smartphones/pads etc. will, IMO, be driving growth for while I think they’re going to go nowhere being king of the desktop hill.
And their acquisition strategy (maybe that’s too generous of a word here) suggests a lot of money and no clear plan of what to do with it.
Again, I haven’t studied them in depth in years, but this is how things strike me. I concede I could be off.
January 14, 2011 at 4:55 PM #653984CoronitaParticipantAnd finally…Not that it’s written by a techie, but it’s kinda funny….
http://www.businessinsider.com/intel-is-probably-the-worst-aquirer-in-tech-history-2010-9
Intel Is Probably The Worst Aquirer In Tech History
January 14, 2011 at 4:55 PM #654050CoronitaParticipantAnd finally…Not that it’s written by a techie, but it’s kinda funny….
http://www.businessinsider.com/intel-is-probably-the-worst-aquirer-in-tech-history-2010-9
Intel Is Probably The Worst Aquirer In Tech History
January 14, 2011 at 4:55 PM #654637CoronitaParticipantAnd finally…Not that it’s written by a techie, but it’s kinda funny….
http://www.businessinsider.com/intel-is-probably-the-worst-aquirer-in-tech-history-2010-9
Intel Is Probably The Worst Aquirer In Tech History
January 14, 2011 at 4:55 PM #654773CoronitaParticipantAnd finally…Not that it’s written by a techie, but it’s kinda funny….
http://www.businessinsider.com/intel-is-probably-the-worst-aquirer-in-tech-history-2010-9
Intel Is Probably The Worst Aquirer In Tech History
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.