- This topic has 145 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by
paramount.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 23, 2009 at 12:41 PM #473599October 23, 2009 at 1:13 PM #472771
briansd1
Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook] Pelosi’s referring to average Americans who participated in the “Tea Parties” as “Nazis”.[/quote]
I think that you have it backwards.
Aren’t the Republicans comparing Obama to Hitler?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/09/18/eveningnews/main5321910.shtmlA Black Hitler. That’s funny.
October 23, 2009 at 1:13 PM #472945Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook] Pelosi’s referring to average Americans who participated in the “Tea Parties” as “Nazis”.[/quote]
I think that you have it backwards.
Aren’t the Republicans comparing Obama to Hitler?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/09/18/eveningnews/main5321910.shtmlA Black Hitler. That’s funny.
October 23, 2009 at 1:13 PM #473308Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook] Pelosi’s referring to average Americans who participated in the “Tea Parties” as “Nazis”.[/quote]
I think that you have it backwards.
Aren’t the Republicans comparing Obama to Hitler?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/09/18/eveningnews/main5321910.shtmlA Black Hitler. That’s funny.
October 23, 2009 at 1:13 PM #473385Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook] Pelosi’s referring to average Americans who participated in the “Tea Parties” as “Nazis”.[/quote]
I think that you have it backwards.
Aren’t the Republicans comparing Obama to Hitler?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/09/18/eveningnews/main5321910.shtmlA Black Hitler. That’s funny.
October 23, 2009 at 1:13 PM #473610Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook] Pelosi’s referring to average Americans who participated in the “Tea Parties” as “Nazis”.[/quote]
I think that you have it backwards.
Aren’t the Republicans comparing Obama to Hitler?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/09/18/eveningnews/main5321910.shtmlA Black Hitler. That’s funny.
October 23, 2009 at 1:16 PM #472776Allan from Fallbrook
Participant[quote=SK in CV]I just have to laugh at this one.
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Paramount: I believe it goes much deeper than that. This is an Administration that won’t abide dissent and seeks to marginalize and demonize its own citizens. Examples being the WH’s attempts to ostracize Fox News..[/quote]
I suppose you were saying the same thing when the Bush White House accused NBC of deceitful editing and started their own war on NBC? Was the Bush White House trying to marginalize and demonize it’s own citizens?[/quote]
SK: Yes, and emphatically so. The Bush Administration did more to erode our civil liberties and freedoms than nearly any administration before.
In fairness, however, the slide began in the 1950s and accelerated through the 1960s (Hoover’s Cointelpro program) and 1970s (Carter’s FISA), and includes expanded wiretapping and surveillance under Clinton.
Laugh all you want, pal, but we’re all losers here. This shit doesn’t know partisanship and both parties are freely complicit in the destruction.
Oh, and I didn’t vote for Bush either time, so don’t try and paint me with that brush.
October 23, 2009 at 1:16 PM #472950Participant[quote=SK in CV]I just have to laugh at this one.
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Paramount: I believe it goes much deeper than that. This is an Administration that won’t abide dissent and seeks to marginalize and demonize its own citizens. Examples being the WH’s attempts to ostracize Fox News..[/quote]
I suppose you were saying the same thing when the Bush White House accused NBC of deceitful editing and started their own war on NBC? Was the Bush White House trying to marginalize and demonize it’s own citizens?[/quote]
SK: Yes, and emphatically so. The Bush Administration did more to erode our civil liberties and freedoms than nearly any administration before.
In fairness, however, the slide began in the 1950s and accelerated through the 1960s (Hoover’s Cointelpro program) and 1970s (Carter’s FISA), and includes expanded wiretapping and surveillance under Clinton.
Laugh all you want, pal, but we’re all losers here. This shit doesn’t know partisanship and both parties are freely complicit in the destruction.
Oh, and I didn’t vote for Bush either time, so don’t try and paint me with that brush.
October 23, 2009 at 1:16 PM #473313Participant[quote=SK in CV]I just have to laugh at this one.
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Paramount: I believe it goes much deeper than that. This is an Administration that won’t abide dissent and seeks to marginalize and demonize its own citizens. Examples being the WH’s attempts to ostracize Fox News..[/quote]
I suppose you were saying the same thing when the Bush White House accused NBC of deceitful editing and started their own war on NBC? Was the Bush White House trying to marginalize and demonize it’s own citizens?[/quote]
SK: Yes, and emphatically so. The Bush Administration did more to erode our civil liberties and freedoms than nearly any administration before.
In fairness, however, the slide began in the 1950s and accelerated through the 1960s (Hoover’s Cointelpro program) and 1970s (Carter’s FISA), and includes expanded wiretapping and surveillance under Clinton.
Laugh all you want, pal, but we’re all losers here. This shit doesn’t know partisanship and both parties are freely complicit in the destruction.
Oh, and I didn’t vote for Bush either time, so don’t try and paint me with that brush.
October 23, 2009 at 1:16 PM #473390Participant[quote=SK in CV]I just have to laugh at this one.
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Paramount: I believe it goes much deeper than that. This is an Administration that won’t abide dissent and seeks to marginalize and demonize its own citizens. Examples being the WH’s attempts to ostracize Fox News..[/quote]
I suppose you were saying the same thing when the Bush White House accused NBC of deceitful editing and started their own war on NBC? Was the Bush White House trying to marginalize and demonize it’s own citizens?[/quote]
SK: Yes, and emphatically so. The Bush Administration did more to erode our civil liberties and freedoms than nearly any administration before.
In fairness, however, the slide began in the 1950s and accelerated through the 1960s (Hoover’s Cointelpro program) and 1970s (Carter’s FISA), and includes expanded wiretapping and surveillance under Clinton.
Laugh all you want, pal, but we’re all losers here. This shit doesn’t know partisanship and both parties are freely complicit in the destruction.
Oh, and I didn’t vote for Bush either time, so don’t try and paint me with that brush.
October 23, 2009 at 1:16 PM #473614Participant[quote=SK in CV]I just have to laugh at this one.
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Paramount: I believe it goes much deeper than that. This is an Administration that won’t abide dissent and seeks to marginalize and demonize its own citizens. Examples being the WH’s attempts to ostracize Fox News..[/quote]
I suppose you were saying the same thing when the Bush White House accused NBC of deceitful editing and started their own war on NBC? Was the Bush White House trying to marginalize and demonize it’s own citizens?[/quote]
SK: Yes, and emphatically so. The Bush Administration did more to erode our civil liberties and freedoms than nearly any administration before.
In fairness, however, the slide began in the 1950s and accelerated through the 1960s (Hoover’s Cointelpro program) and 1970s (Carter’s FISA), and includes expanded wiretapping and surveillance under Clinton.
Laugh all you want, pal, but we’re all losers here. This shit doesn’t know partisanship and both parties are freely complicit in the destruction.
Oh, and I didn’t vote for Bush either time, so don’t try and paint me with that brush.
October 23, 2009 at 1:16 PM #472781Casca
Participant[quote=briansd1]The neo-nazis and skinheads tend to come from among the ranks of the disgruntled unemployed.[/quote]
Really? I’d like to see the numbers on that.
[quote=briansd1]
Jihadism is all about economics and joblessness. Religion serves as a spark to light the fire. Misguided fervor then fuels the fire.[/quote]
Ah, so those misguided souls who slashed flight attendants, and murderously flew their captives into the towers, murdering some 3000 innocents, simply did it because they didn’t have jobs?
Brian, you are an unadulterated blithering buffoon.
October 23, 2009 at 1:16 PM #472955Participant[quote=briansd1]The neo-nazis and skinheads tend to come from among the ranks of the disgruntled unemployed.[/quote]
Really? I’d like to see the numbers on that.
[quote=briansd1]
Jihadism is all about economics and joblessness. Religion serves as a spark to light the fire. Misguided fervor then fuels the fire.[/quote]
Ah, so those misguided souls who slashed flight attendants, and murderously flew their captives into the towers, murdering some 3000 innocents, simply did it because they didn’t have jobs?
Brian, you are an unadulterated blithering buffoon.
October 23, 2009 at 1:16 PM #473319Participant[quote=briansd1]The neo-nazis and skinheads tend to come from among the ranks of the disgruntled unemployed.[/quote]
Really? I’d like to see the numbers on that.
[quote=briansd1]
Jihadism is all about economics and joblessness. Religion serves as a spark to light the fire. Misguided fervor then fuels the fire.[/quote]
Ah, so those misguided souls who slashed flight attendants, and murderously flew their captives into the towers, murdering some 3000 innocents, simply did it because they didn’t have jobs?
Brian, you are an unadulterated blithering buffoon.
October 23, 2009 at 1:16 PM #473395Participant[quote=briansd1]The neo-nazis and skinheads tend to come from among the ranks of the disgruntled unemployed.[/quote]
Really? I’d like to see the numbers on that.
[quote=briansd1]
Jihadism is all about economics and joblessness. Religion serves as a spark to light the fire. Misguided fervor then fuels the fire.[/quote]
Ah, so those misguided souls who slashed flight attendants, and murderously flew their captives into the towers, murdering some 3000 innocents, simply did it because they didn’t have jobs?
Brian, you are an unadulterated blithering buffoon.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.