- This topic has 40 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 2 months ago by
bearishgurl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 10, 2011 at 12:32 AM #18793May 10, 2011 at 8:29 AM #694077
UCGal
ParticipantMaybe I’m just incredibly old school… but I have a hard time understanding walking away after 25 years. You put the work in and find a compromise…
But then again, I’ve never been faced with a cheating spouse (that I know of), nor blatent lying… not saying that’s what happened here… just saying that’s something I don’t know how I’d react to…
May 10, 2011 at 8:29 AM #694765ParticipantMaybe I’m just incredibly old school… but I have a hard time understanding walking away after 25 years. You put the work in and find a compromise…
But then again, I’ve never been faced with a cheating spouse (that I know of), nor blatent lying… not saying that’s what happened here… just saying that’s something I don’t know how I’d react to…
May 10, 2011 at 8:29 AM #694912ParticipantMaybe I’m just incredibly old school… but I have a hard time understanding walking away after 25 years. You put the work in and find a compromise…
But then again, I’ve never been faced with a cheating spouse (that I know of), nor blatent lying… not saying that’s what happened here… just saying that’s something I don’t know how I’d react to…
May 10, 2011 at 8:29 AM #695266ParticipantMaybe I’m just incredibly old school… but I have a hard time understanding walking away after 25 years. You put the work in and find a compromise…
But then again, I’ve never been faced with a cheating spouse (that I know of), nor blatent lying… not saying that’s what happened here… just saying that’s something I don’t know how I’d react to…
May 10, 2011 at 8:29 AM #694159ParticipantMaybe I’m just incredibly old school… but I have a hard time understanding walking away after 25 years. You put the work in and find a compromise…
But then again, I’ve never been faced with a cheating spouse (that I know of), nor blatent lying… not saying that’s what happened here… just saying that’s something I don’t know how I’d react to…
May 10, 2011 at 8:37 AM #694775scaredyclassic
ParticipantNow there’s no point to amending the constitution to let him run. Dammit
May 10, 2011 at 8:37 AM #694922ParticipantNow there’s no point to amending the constitution to let him run. Dammit
May 10, 2011 at 8:37 AM #694169ParticipantNow there’s no point to amending the constitution to let him run. Dammit
May 10, 2011 at 8:37 AM #695276ParticipantNow there’s no point to amending the constitution to let him run. Dammit
May 10, 2011 at 8:37 AM #694087ParticipantNow there’s no point to amending the constitution to let him run. Dammit
May 10, 2011 at 10:28 AM #694174briansd1
GuestVery rich people have more means. To them, splitting up does not really change their lifestyles.
Ordinary folks are afraid of separation/divorce because they will lose the house, etc…
I have a friend who “hates” his wife. He works out of town and had a mistress 1/2 his age but he was too cheap to “help her out” so the girlfriend left him.
Although he wants to, my friend will not leave his wife because he’s afraid of the consequences of asset separation.
I think that it’s better to split up than remain together and be miserable. But some marriages are more bearable/harmonious/convenient than others. There’s nothing wrong with being in a loveless marriage of convenience and security. People have been doing that for ages.
*
Studies have shown that rich folks are in a class apart. They actually tend to stay married for convenience, in general. They have the means to keep several households and have lovers on the side, if they wish.
Middle class folks are more likely to stay married, and locked in the marriage without outside lovers, because of financial security issues. When you live the suburbs and raise a family, there’s not much time and opportunity to “escape”.
Poor folks tend to be loose, no matter if they are conservatives in the Red States, or the urban poor of the Blue States.
May 10, 2011 at 10:28 AM #694927GuestVery rich people have more means. To them, splitting up does not really change their lifestyles.
Ordinary folks are afraid of separation/divorce because they will lose the house, etc…
I have a friend who “hates” his wife. He works out of town and had a mistress 1/2 his age but he was too cheap to “help her out” so the girlfriend left him.
Although he wants to, my friend will not leave his wife because he’s afraid of the consequences of asset separation.
I think that it’s better to split up than remain together and be miserable. But some marriages are more bearable/harmonious/convenient than others. There’s nothing wrong with being in a loveless marriage of convenience and security. People have been doing that for ages.
*
Studies have shown that rich folks are in a class apart. They actually tend to stay married for convenience, in general. They have the means to keep several households and have lovers on the side, if they wish.
Middle class folks are more likely to stay married, and locked in the marriage without outside lovers, because of financial security issues. When you live the suburbs and raise a family, there’s not much time and opportunity to “escape”.
Poor folks tend to be loose, no matter if they are conservatives in the Red States, or the urban poor of the Blue States.
May 10, 2011 at 10:28 AM #695281GuestVery rich people have more means. To them, splitting up does not really change their lifestyles.
Ordinary folks are afraid of separation/divorce because they will lose the house, etc…
I have a friend who “hates” his wife. He works out of town and had a mistress 1/2 his age but he was too cheap to “help her out” so the girlfriend left him.
Although he wants to, my friend will not leave his wife because he’s afraid of the consequences of asset separation.
I think that it’s better to split up than remain together and be miserable. But some marriages are more bearable/harmonious/convenient than others. There’s nothing wrong with being in a loveless marriage of convenience and security. People have been doing that for ages.
*
Studies have shown that rich folks are in a class apart. They actually tend to stay married for convenience, in general. They have the means to keep several households and have lovers on the side, if they wish.
Middle class folks are more likely to stay married, and locked in the marriage without outside lovers, because of financial security issues. When you live the suburbs and raise a family, there’s not much time and opportunity to “escape”.
Poor folks tend to be loose, no matter if they are conservatives in the Red States, or the urban poor of the Blue States.
May 10, 2011 at 10:28 AM #694092GuestVery rich people have more means. To them, splitting up does not really change their lifestyles.
Ordinary folks are afraid of separation/divorce because they will lose the house, etc…
I have a friend who “hates” his wife. He works out of town and had a mistress 1/2 his age but he was too cheap to “help her out” so the girlfriend left him.
Although he wants to, my friend will not leave his wife because he’s afraid of the consequences of asset separation.
I think that it’s better to split up than remain together and be miserable. But some marriages are more bearable/harmonious/convenient than others. There’s nothing wrong with being in a loveless marriage of convenience and security. People have been doing that for ages.
*
Studies have shown that rich folks are in a class apart. They actually tend to stay married for convenience, in general. They have the means to keep several households and have lovers on the side, if they wish.
Middle class folks are more likely to stay married, and locked in the marriage without outside lovers, because of financial security issues. When you live the suburbs and raise a family, there’s not much time and opportunity to “escape”.
Poor folks tend to be loose, no matter if they are conservatives in the Red States, or the urban poor of the Blue States.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.