OT – GOP is being carried to the extreme

[Zeitgeist]

I agree. It was a waste of our money.

[Zeitgeist]

As for aspartame:

http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/aspartame.asp

[Zeitgeist]

As for aspartame:

http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/aspartame.asp

[Zeitgeist]

As for aspartame:

http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/aspartame.asp

[Zeitgeist]

As for aspartame:

http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/aspartame.asp

[Zeitgeist]

As for aspartame:

http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/aspartame.asp

[Zeitgeist]

delete

[Zeitgeist]

delete

[Zeitgeist]

delete

[Zeitgeist]

delete

[Zeitgeist]

delete

[briansd1]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Brian: Containment of Iraq worked well for “several decades”? Really? Which “several” decades are we talking about?
[/quote]

Wasn’t Saddam Hussein in power from 1979 to 2003?
Didn’t we use Iran and Iran against each other for our security purposes?

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Again, Brian, what we have here is your inability to discern/distinguish differences and thus you simply lump everything together under the term “conservative”.

As a Jesuit educated Catholic, I was taught that BOTH Faith and Reason are the wings of enlightenment. For someone who is supposedly a reasoned “believer”, you seem to have a hard time understanding truly conservative positions and would rather blindly broad brush anyone you don’t agree with, or that doesn’t agree with you, as an unthinking, blinkered ignoramus. [/quote]

Allan, I can discern the differences very well. And I think that you, Allan, are fairly honest in your views.

I was making references to conservative Republicans in general. They are not intellectually honest and only a big-gun, an-eye-for-an-eye approach works with them. To them, trying to debate rationally only indicates that you’re a wuss.

The base of the Republican party is a joke. They are a bunch of ranting, loud, vulgar, ignorant and overweight working-class thugs. They wear oversized outfits not different than the hoodlums of the inner city.

They hardly represent the conservative values of impeccable Christian upbringing and decorum.

Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh, the way they rant and gesture, sound like low-class union organizers, not conservative intellectuals.

[briansd1]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Brian: Containment of Iraq worked well for “several decades”? Really? Which “several” decades are we talking about?
[/quote]

Wasn’t Saddam Hussein in power from 1979 to 2003?
Didn’t we use Iran and Iran against each other for our security purposes?

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Again, Brian, what we have here is your inability to discern/distinguish differences and thus you simply lump everything together under the term “conservative”.

As a Jesuit educated Catholic, I was taught that BOTH Faith and Reason are the wings of enlightenment. For someone who is supposedly a reasoned “believer”, you seem to have a hard time understanding truly conservative positions and would rather blindly broad brush anyone you don’t agree with, or that doesn’t agree with you, as an unthinking, blinkered ignoramus. [/quote]

Allan, I can discern the differences very well. And I think that you, Allan, are fairly honest in your views.

I was making references to conservative Republicans in general. They are not intellectually honest and only a big-gun, an-eye-for-an-eye approach works with them. To them, trying to debate rationally only indicates that you’re a wuss.

The base of the Republican party is a joke. They are a bunch of ranting, loud, vulgar, ignorant and overweight working-class thugs. They wear oversized outfits not different than the hoodlums of the inner city.

They hardly represent the conservative values of impeccable Christian upbringing and decorum.

Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh, the way they rant and gesture, sound like low-class union organizers, not conservative intellectuals.

[briansd1]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Brian: Containment of Iraq worked well for “several decades”? Really? Which “several” decades are we talking about?
[/quote]

Wasn’t Saddam Hussein in power from 1979 to 2003?
Didn’t we use Iran and Iran against each other for our security purposes?

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Again, Brian, what we have here is your inability to discern/distinguish differences and thus you simply lump everything together under the term “conservative”.

As a Jesuit educated Catholic, I was taught that BOTH Faith and Reason are the wings of enlightenment. For someone who is supposedly a reasoned “believer”, you seem to have a hard time understanding truly conservative positions and would rather blindly broad brush anyone you don’t agree with, or that doesn’t agree with you, as an unthinking, blinkered ignoramus. [/quote]

Allan, I can discern the differences very well. And I think that you, Allan, are fairly honest in your views.

I was making references to conservative Republicans in general. They are not intellectually honest and only a big-gun, an-eye-for-an-eye approach works with them. To them, trying to debate rationally only indicates that you’re a wuss.

The base of the Republican party is a joke. They are a bunch of ranting, loud, vulgar, ignorant and overweight working-class thugs. They wear oversized outfits not different than the hoodlums of the inner city.

They hardly represent the conservative values of impeccable Christian upbringing and decorum.

Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh, the way they rant and gesture, sound like low-class union organizers, not conservative intellectuals.

[briansd1]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Brian: Containment of Iraq worked well for “several decades”? Really? Which “several” decades are we talking about?
[/quote]

Wasn’t Saddam Hussein in power from 1979 to 2003?
Didn’t we use Iran and Iran against each other for our security purposes?

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Again, Brian, what we have here is your inability to discern/distinguish differences and thus you simply lump everything together under the term “conservative”.

As a Jesuit educated Catholic, I was taught that BOTH Faith and Reason are the wings of enlightenment. For someone who is supposedly a reasoned “believer”, you seem to have a hard time understanding truly conservative positions and would rather blindly broad brush anyone you don’t agree with, or that doesn’t agree with you, as an unthinking, blinkered ignoramus. [/quote]

Allan, I can discern the differences very well. And I think that you, Allan, are fairly honest in your views.

I was making references to conservative Republicans in general. They are not intellectually honest and only a big-gun, an-eye-for-an-eye approach works with them. To them, trying to debate rationally only indicates that you’re a wuss.

The base of the Republican party is a joke. They are a bunch of ranting, loud, vulgar, ignorant and overweight working-class thugs. They wear oversized outfits not different than the hoodlums of the inner city.

They hardly represent the conservative values of impeccable Christian upbringing and decorum.

Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh, the way they rant and gesture, sound like low-class union organizers, not conservative intellectuals.

[Author]

Posts